한국비블리아학회지 (Journal of the Korean BIBLIA Society for library and Information Science)

한국비블리아학회 (Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science)
권호 표지

대학도서관의 디지털장서 개발정책에 관한 연구

A Study on Digital Collection Development Policies of Academic Libraries

  • 유재옥 (덕성여자대학교 문헌정보학과)
  • 발행 : 2003.06.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

도서관이 장서를 디지털화 하고자하는 데에는 크게 두 가지의 목적을 가진다. 첫째는 장서의 보존에 역점을 두어 아날로그 장서를 디지털장서로 변환함으로써 기존 장서를 영구 보존하고자 함이며, 둘째는 기존장서를 디지털화함으로써 이용자에게 편리한 접근서비스를 제공하고자 한다. 본 논문은 대학도서관이 장서의 일부로서 디지털장서를 구축하고자 할 때 고려해야 할 점을 살펴보았다. 디지털도서의 목적과 의미를 개관하였으며 디지털장서 개발정책의 기준을 고찰하였다. 대학도서관의 디지털장서 개발정책 수립 시 고려해야 할 요인들을 논의하였다. 디지털 대상도서 선정기준, 디지털장서의 적정크기, 지식통제 및 자료관리의 필요성, 공동 디지털장서 개발사업의 중요성 등을 살펴보았다. 대학도서관의 디지털장서 개발정책은 전통적인 장서개발정책과 통합되어야 하며 대학도서관의 디지털장서가 연구와 강의를 지원하는 대학의 사명을 충족시킬 수 있는 전략적인 장서로 구축되어야 함을 강조하였다.

This paper reviews digital collection development policies of academic libraries in America which attempted to digitize their collections in order to preserve their analog collections and to provide easy access to their digital collections. Such factors as selecting materials for digitization, sustainable size of digital collection, bibliographic control and collection management, coordinated digital collection project are discussed in order to be fully integrated into traditional collection development policies of academic libraries.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Arms. Caroline R. 2000. Keeping Memory Alive: Practices for Preserving Digital Content at the National Digital Library Program of the Library of Congress. Available at http://www. rlg. org/preserv/diginews/diginews4-3.html
  2. Brancolini，Kristine R. 2000. Selecting Research Collections for Digitization: Applying the Harvard Model. Library Trends. 48(4):783-798
  3. California Digital Library. 2000. Library of Congress Grant: California Cultures. Executive Summary. Oakland. Calif.: California Digital Library
  4. Cornell University. 2001. Report of the Digital Preservation Working Group on Establishing a Central Depository for Preserving Digital Image Collections (version 1.0). Available at http://www.library.cornell.edu/imls/image%20deposit%20guidelines. pdf
  5. Council on Library and Information Resources. 2001. The Evidence in Hand: the Report of the Task Force on the Artifact in Library collections (draft). Available at http://www.clir.org/activities/details/artifact-docs. html
  6. Digital Library Federation. 2001. Registry of Digitized Books and Serial Publications. Available at http://www.diglib.org/collections/reg/reg.htm
  7. Digital Library Federation and Research Libraries Group. 2000. Guides to Quality in Visual Resource Imaging. Available at http://www. rlg.org/visguides/
  8. de Stefano. Paula. 2001. Selection for Digital Conversion in Academic Libraries. College & Research Libraries. 62 (1): 58-69 https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.62.1.58
  9. Flecker. Dale. 2000. Harvard's Digital Library Initiative: Building a First Generation Digital Library Infrastructure. D-Lib Magazine. 6(11). Available at http//www.dlib.org/dlib/november00/flecker/llflecker.html
  10. Gertz. Janet. 2000. Selection for Preservation in the Digital Age (Overview). Library Resources & Technical Services. 44(April):97-104 https://doi.org/10.5860/lrts.44n2.97
  11. Hazen. D., J. Horrell, and J. Merrill-Oldham, 1998. Selecting Research Collections for Digitization. Washington. DC: Council on Library and Information Resources. Available at http://www. c1ir. org/pubs/reports/hazen/pub74.html
  12. Hogan. T. 2001. Drexel University Moves Aggressively from Print to Electronic Access To Journals. Computers in Libraries. 21 (5): 22-27
  13. Hoffert. B. 2001. Book report 2001: The budget shifts. Library Journal. 126(3): 130-132
  14. Kenney. Anne R., and Oya Y. Rieger. 2000. Moving Theory into Practice: Digital Imaging for Libraries and Archives. Mountain View, Calif.: Research Libraries Group. Available at http://www. rlg. org/preserv/mtip2000.html
  15. Library of Congress National Digital Library Program. 1997. NDLP Project Planning Checklist. Available at http://memory.locgov/ammem/techdocs/prjplan.html
  16. Library of Congress. 2001. Library to Lead National Effort to Develop Digital Information Infrastructure and Preservation Program. Press release. January 12, 2001. Available at http://www.loc.gov/today/pr/200l/01006.html
  17. Lord. Johathan & Bart Ragon. 2001. Working Together to Develop Electronic Collections. Computers in Libraries, 21 (5): 40-44
  18. O' Brien, D.P. 2000. Books Unbound. Forrester Research. Cambridge ,MA
  19. Oxford Scoping Project. 1999. Scoping the Future of Oxford's Digital Collections. Available at http://www.bodley.ox.ac.uk/scoping/
  20. Panitch , Judy. 2001. Special Collections in ARL Libraries: Results of the 1998 Survey Sponsored by the ARL Research Committee. Washington. D.C.: Association of Research Libraries
  21. Research Libraries Group. 1996. Selecting Library and Archive Collections for Digital Reformatting. Mountain View, Calif.: Research Libraries Group
  22. Sitts. Maxine K., ed. 2000. Handbook for Digital Projects: A Management Tool for Preservation & Access. Andover. Mass.: Northeast Document Conservation Center (NEDCC). Available at http://www.nedcc.org/digital/dighome.htm
  23. Smith. Abby. 1999. Why Digitize? Washington. D. C.: Council on Library and Information Resources. Available at http://www.clir.org/pubs/reports/pub80-smith/pub80. html
  24. University of Michigan. 1999. Principles and Considerations for University of Michigan Library Subject Specialists. Guidelines for Selection in Digital Projects (Feb. 23 update). Available at http://www.umdl.umich.edu/policies/digitpolicyfinal. html