한국비블리아학회지 (Journal of the Korean BIBLIA Society for library and Information Science)

한국비블리아학회 (Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science)
권호 표지

주요 학술지 주제분석을 통한 정보학 연구동향 비교

A Comparative Analysis of the Research Subject in the Recent Journals of Information Science

  • 유사라 (서울여자대학교 정보영상학부 문헌정보학과)
  • 발행 : 2003.12.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

정보학의 연구동향을 살피기 위하여 2000년부터 2003년까지 최근 3년간 주요 학술지 논문주제를 분석하였다. 분석 기준은 최근 정보학 연구의 지식구조의 변화 탐지를 주목적으로 새로이 개발된 IS Taxonomy(Hawkins, 2003)를 적용했으며 이로써 국내외에서 이루어진 2000년 초반기의 정보학 연구의 공통된 특성이나 차이를 살펴보았다. 학술지를 통하여 나타난 중심주제와 그로써 표출되는 연구 동향이나 추세의 특징이 국내외 환경을 구분하는지 여부를 검증했으며 기존 연구방향과 비교하고 그로 나타나는 도서관 관련 학술연구에 대한 사회수요의 변화를 분석했다.

As information technology advances and changes in the library environment, a flexible view and reinventing perspective of LIS research is necessary. This study focused on the investigation of the recent(2000-2003) research trends by analyzing the contents of articles from the major academic research journals for getting a future oriented view of the field. A taxonomy developed by Hawkins(2003) was applied in order to find out the major pattern of research in the domestic as well as international LIS Journals, and Chi-Square Tests Analysis was used to figure out if the research pattern has any effect on research environment(vice versa).

키워드

참고문헌

  1. About SCIP. 2001. The Society of Competitive Intelligence Professionals.
  2. Allen. Bryce L. 1996. Information Tasks: Toward a User-Gentered Approach to Information Systems. San Diego, London, Boston. New York. Sydney, Tokyo. Toronto: Academic Press
  3. Blaise. Cronin. 1998. Information Professionals in the Digital Age. IntI. Inform. & Libr. Rev. p.37-50
  4. Carol. Tenopir. 2000. Online Databases. Library Journal. p.36-38
  5. Corcoran, Mary. 2000. Changing Roles of Information Professionals: Choices and Implications. Online. p.72-74
  6. Ellis, David. 1996. Progress Problems in Information Retrieval. London: Library Association Publishing
  7. Erdelez, Sanda. 1999. Information Encountering: It's More Than Just Bumping into Information. Bulletin of the Amerilcan society for Information Science 25(3): 25-29
  8. Infosta Homepage. 1999. Information Science and Technology Association.
  9. Sabroski, Suzanne J. et al. 1998. The Independent Information Professional.
  10. Sandstorm. Pamela Effrein. 1999. Scholars as Subsistence Foragers. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science 25(3): 17-20 https://doi.org/10.1002/bult.116
  11. Smiraglia, Richard P. , and Gregory H. Leazer. 1999. Derivative Bibliographic Relationships: The Work Relationship in a Global BibliographicH.G. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(6): 493-504 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(1999)50:6<493::AID-ASI4>3.0.CO;2-U
  12. Tatsuo, Kotake. 1992. Database Searchers' Examination. JCQ.. p.42-48
  13. The journal of Information Science and Technology Association Contents of Back Number. 2000. The Journal of Information Science and Technology Association.
  14. Walker, Geraldene and Joseph Janes. 1993. Online Retrieval: A Dialogue of Theory and Practice. Englewood, Colorado: Libraries Unlimited, Inc