Environmental Impact and Allowable Density Using the Rural Residential Density Matrix

주거밀도모형을 이용한 환경영향분석과 수용능력 산출

  • Received : 2003.04.03
  • Accepted : 2003.05.17
  • Published : 2003.07.31

Abstract

Analysis of carrying capacity and site suitability by the systematic application of environmental information an provide a basis for implementing environmentally sensitive and sustainable resource development policies. Based on the availability of public services and environmental and site-specific constraints, a Rural Residential Density Matrix was applied in Santa Cruz County, California, USA to assess the development potential of rural land parcels since 1980. In one case, the Matrix was applied to calculate the allowable development density on a site in Lompico planned for use as a Buddhist retreat center. These calculations revealed higher environmental sensitivity and lower carrying capacity than projected in the proposed plan. Under the constraints of the county's minimum acreage policies and insufficient developable land, the developer cancelled the proposed plan. This example suggests that application of the Matrix at the concept development stage would increase the effectiveness of the prior environmental review and environmental impact assessment (EIA) system in Korea.

Keywords

References

  1. 김귀곤. 1994. 미래환경과 환경영향평가, 지속가능한 개발과 환경영향평가, 제22회 세계환경의 날 기념 세미나, 국립환경연구원, 한국환경영향평가학회. 46
  2. 김명진 외 3인. 1992. 환경정보체계를 이용한 환경영향평가에 관한 연구(I) : GIS 활용을 중심으로. 환경영향평가학회지. 1(1), 22
  3. 김명진 외 3인. 1994. 환경정보의 체계적 분석 및 관리방안 연구. 환경영향평가학회지. 3(1), 8
  4. 이명우. 1993. 자연공원의 환경분석 및 용도지역 설정을 위한 전산환경정보체계의 수립과 적용, 환경영향평가학회지. 2(1), 45
  5. 환경부. 2003. 업무보고, 제236회 국회임시회 환경노동위원회. 49-50
  6. County of Santa Cruz, 1990, Environmental Review Guidelines
  7. County of Santa Cruz. 1999. Rural Density Matrix Worksheet, Planning and Zoning Regulations
  8. IAIA. 2002. The Linkages between Impact Assessment and the Sustainable Development Agenda, and Recommendations for Actions, Statements and Policy Briefing for the World Summit on Sustainable Development 4-10
  9. Nixon, A. J. and B. D. Clark, 1994, Environmental Impact Assessment and Sustainable Development: Key Issues and Future Directions, J. of EIA 3(1), 61
  10. Ortolano, L., 1984, Environmental Planning and Decision Making, John Wiley & Sons, 232
  11. Weaver, A., 2000, The Flip Side: A Vision for Impact Assessment in the 21st Century, IAIA President's Visions for Impact Assessment: Where will Impact Assessment be in 10 Years and How Do We Get There?, 113-118
  12. Westman, W. E., 1985, Ecology, Impact Assessment, and Environmental Planning, John Wiley & Sons, 201-202