DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Study on the Scenario Earthquake Determining Methods Based on the Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis

확률론적 지진재해도를 이용한 시나리오 지진의 결정기법에 관한 연구

  • Published : 2004.12.01

Abstract

The design earthquake used for the seismic analysis and design of NPP (Nuclear Power Plant) is determined by the deterministic or probabilistic methods. The probabilistic seismic hazard analysis(PSHA) for the nuclear power plant sites was performed for the probabilistic seismic risk assessment. The probabilistic seismic hazard analysis for the nuclear power plant site had been completed as a part of the probabilistic seismic risk assessment. The probabilistic method become a resonable method to determine the design earthquakes for NPPs. In this study, the defining method of the probability based scenario earthquake was established, and as a sample calculation, the probability based scenario earthquakes were estimated by the de-aggregation of the probabilistic seismic hazard. By using this method, it is possible to define the probability based scenario earthquakes for the seismic design and seismic safety evaluation of structures. It is necessary to develop the rational seismic source map and the attenuation equations for the development of reasonable scenario earthquakes.

원전 구조물 및 기기의 내진설계를 위한 설계지진의 설정에는 결정론적 방법이나 확률론적 방법이 사용되어 왔다. 최근에는 확률론적 지진재해도 분석이 일반화 되면서 확률론적으로 설계지진 및 평가용 지진의 설정 방법이 합리적인 방법으로서 인식되어 많이 사용되고 있다. 우리나라의 경우 원전부지에 대한 확률론적 지진재해도 분석이 확률론적 지진위험도 평가의 일환으로 대부분 완료되어 있다. 본 연구에서는 확률론적 지진재해도의 재분해를 통하여 확률론적 시나리오 지진을 산정할 수 있는 기법을 확립하고 국내 원전 부지에 대한 확률론적 지진재해도 분석 결과를 이용하여 계산 예를 수행하였다. 이 기법을 사용하면 내진설계 및 내진안전성 평가에 활용할 수 있는 확률론적 시나리오 지진을 설정할 수 있어 매우 유용한 것으로 판단되며 합리적인 시나리오 지진의 산정을 위해서는 합리적인 지진구역도 및 감쇄식의 개발이 필요하다.

Keywords

References

  1. US NRC Regulatory Guide 1.60, Design Response Spectra for Seismic Design of Nuclear Power Plants, 1973
  2. J. W. Reed, R. P. Kennedy, and B. Lashkari, Analysis of High-Frequency Seismic Effects, EPRl TR-102470, 1993
  3. US NRC Regulatory Guide 1.165, Identification and Characterization of Seismic Sources and Determination of Safe Shutdown Earthquake Ground Motion, 1997
  4. C. A. Cornell, 'Engineering Seismic Risk Analysis,' Bulletin of Seismological Society of America, Vol.58, No. 5, pp. 1583-1606, 1968
  5. A. Der-Kiureghian, and A. H-S. Ang, 'A Fault Ru-pture Model for Seismic Risk Analysis,' Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, Vol.67, No.4, 1997, pp. 1173-1194
  6. J. Hirose, K. Murarnatsu, T. Okumura, and S. Taki, 'A Procedure for the Determination of Scenario Earth-quakes for Seismic Design Based on Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis,' JAERl-Research 2002-009, 2002
  7. 龜田弘行,石川 裕, 'ハザ一ド適合マグニチュ一ド · 晨央 距離による地晨危險度解析の擴張,' 土木學會論文集, No. 392/I-9, 1984
  8. 龜田弘行, 石川 裕, 中島正人, '確率論約想定地震の漑念 と應用,'土木學會論文集, No.577/I-41, 1997
  9. R.K. McGuire, 'Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis and Design Earthquakes : Closing the Loop,' Bulletin of Seismological Society of America, Vol.85, No.5, 1995, pp. 1275-1284
  10. K. Muramatsu and J. Hirose, 'The Use of Seismic Hazard Analysis for Determining Scenario Design Earthquakes - An Overview of a Recently Com-pleted Work at JAERl -,' Procedings of the Seventh Korea-Japan Joint Workshop on Probabilistic Safety Assessment, 2002
  11. 社團法人 日本電氣協會, 原子力發電耐雲設計技術指針 (重要度分額 · 許容應力編 : JEAG 4601 · 補-1984), 1984
  12. lAEA, Earthquakes and Associated Topics in Relation to NPP Siting, IAEA Safety Standard Series No. 50-SG-S1 (Rev. 1), 1991
  13. Central Research Institute of Electric Power Industry, 'Korea-Japan Joint Research on Development of Seis-mic Capacity Evaluation and Enhancement Technology Considering Near-Fault Effect (Annual Report 2003),' KAERl/RR-2392/2003, 2003
  14. 서정문, 민경식, 전영선, 최인길, '지진재해도 평가의 불확실성 개선에 관한 연구', KAERI/CR-65/99, 1999
  15. Korea Electric Power Research Institute, 'An Evaluation of Inputs to the Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis,' Technical Report TR.96NJ21. J1999.72, 1999
  16. Baag, Chang-Eob, Chang, Sung-Joon, Jo, Nam-Dae and Shin, Jin-Soo, ' Evaluation of Seismic Hazard in the Southern Part of Korea,' Proceeding of the 2nd International Symposium on Seismic Hazards and Ground Motion in the Region of Moderate Seismicity, 1998
  17. G. R Toro, N. A. Abrahamson, and J. F. Schneider, 'Model of Strong Motions from Earthquakes in Central and Eastern North America: Best Estimates and Uncertainties,' Seismological Research Letters, Vol.68, No.1, 1997
  18. Paul Somerville, 'Characterization of Near-Fault Ground Motions,' U.S.-Japan Workshop on the Effects of Near-Field Earthquake Shaking, San Francisco, California, 2000, pp. 21-29