족관절 안정성의 예상인자 -격자각과 비골의 길이-

Predicting Factors on Ankle Stability - Mortise Angle and Fibular Length -

  • Lee, Sang-Wook (Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine, Daegu Catholic University) ;
  • Koh, Sang-Bong (Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine, Daegu Catholic University) ;
  • Shin, Min-Cheul (Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine, Daegu Catholic University) ;
  • Lee, Byoung-Kwan (Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine, Daegu Catholic University)
  • 발행 : 2004.06.01

초록

Purpose: The aim of this study was to investigate the usefulness of mortise angle and fibular length measured in radiologic findings in predicting the ankle stability. Materials and Methods: One hundred cases fifty cases were randomly selected volunteers with normal ankle function and the other fifty cases were randomly selected patients whose ankle were treated in our hospital and who were followed for over 1 years with good results. A specific experimental fixture were made to get the even AP and lateral view and objective stress view. Results: The mortise angle and fibular length was not statistically significant to the degree of talar tilt angle under valgus or varus stress and that of displacement under anterior or posterior stress. Conclusion: The mortise angle and fibular length was not the objective predicting factors on the ankle stability. Maintenance of constrained talus in dynamic status is most important factors in determining the ankle stability.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Kanbe K, Hasegawa A, Nakajima Y, and Takagishi K:The relationship of the anterior drawer sign to the shape of the tibial plafond in chronic lateral instability of the ankle. Foot Ankle Int, 23: 118-22, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1177/107110070202300207
  2. Larsen E: Experimental instability of the ankle. A radiographic investigation. Clin Orthop, 204: 193-200,1986.
  3. Meyer TL Jr and Kumler KW: A.S.I.F technique and ankle fracture. Clin Orthop, 150: 211-216, 1980.
  4. Pettrone FA, Gail M, Pee D, Fitzpatrick T and Van Herpe LB: Quantitative criteria for prediction of the results after displaced fracture of the ankle. J Bone Joint Surg, 65-A: 667-677, 1983. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-198365050-00013
  5. Ramsey PL and Hamilton W: Changes in tibiotalar area of contact caused by lateral talar shift. J Bone Joint Surg, 58-A: 356-357, 1976. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-197658030-00010
  6. Rhee KJ, Hwang DS and Jin YA: A Clinical study of ankle fracture. J Korean Fracture Soc, 4: 63-74, 1991.
  7. Rolfe B, Nordt W, Sallis JG and Distefano M: Assessing fibular length using bimalleolar angular measurements. Foot Ankle Int, 10: 104-109, 1989. https://doi.org/10.1177/107110078901000210
  8. Rukavina A: The role of fibular length and the width of the ankle mortise in post-traumatic osteoarthrosis after malleolar fracture. Int Orthop, 22: 357-360, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002640050277
  9. Scranton PE Jr, McMaster JG and Kelly E: Dynamic fibular function: a new concept. Clin Orthop, 118: 76-81, 1976.
  10. Takao M, Ochi M, Naito K, et al.: Computed tomographic evaluation of the position of the leg for mortise radiographs. Foot Ankle Int, 2210: 828-831, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1177/107110070102201009
  11. Tohyama H, Beynnon BD, Renstrom PA, Theis MJ, Fleming BC and Pope MH: Biomechanical analysis of the ankle anterior drawer test for anterior talofibular ligament injuries. J Orthop Res, 13: 609-614, 1995. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.1100130417
  12. Weinert TR: Human fibular dynamics. Foot science, 1-6, 1976.
  13. Yablon IG, Heller FG and Shouse L: The key role of the lateral malleolus in displaced fractures of the ankle. J Bone Joint Surg, 59: 169-73, 1977. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-197759020-00005
  14. Yablon IG and Leach RE: Reconstruction of malunited fractures of the lateral malleolus. J Bone Joint Surg, 71-A:521-527, 1989. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-198971040-00007