Functional Analysis of the Putative BUB2 Homologues of C. elegans in the Spindle Position Checkpoint

  • Lee, Kyung-Hee (Department of Biochemistry, and Institute of Life Science and Biotechnology, College of Sciences, Yonsei University) ;
  • Song, Ki-Won (Department of Biochemistry, and Institute of Life Science and Biotechnology, College of Sciences, Yonsei University)
  • Published : 2005.06.01

Abstract

Spindle position checkpoint monitors the orientation of mitotic spindle for proper segregation of replicated chromosomes into mother cell and the daughter, and prohibits mitotic exit when mitotic spindle is misaligned. BUB2 forms one of the key upstream element of spindle position checkpoint in budding yeast, but its functional homologues have not been identified in higher eukaryotes. Here, we analyzed the functions of two putative BUB2 homologues of C. elegans in the spindle orientation checkpoint. From the C. elegans genome database, we found that two open reading frames (ORFs), F35H12_2 and C33F10_2, showed high sequence homology with BUB2. We obtained the expressed sequence tag (EST) clones for F35H12_2 (yk221d4) and C33F10_2 (yk14e10) and verified the full cDNA for each ORF by sequencing and 5' RACE with SL1 primer. The functional complementation assays of yk221d4 and yk14e10 in ${\Delta}bub2$ of S. cerevisiae revealed that these putative BUB2 homologues of C. elegans could not replace the function of BUB2 in spindle position checkpoint and mitotic exit. Our attempt to document the component of spindle position checkpoint in metazoans using sequence homology was not successful. This suggests that structural information about its components might be required to identify functional homologues of the spindle position checkpoint in higher eukaryotes.

Keywords

References

  1. Alexandru G, Zachariae W, Schleiffer A, and Nasmyth K (1999) Sister chromatid separation and chromosome re-duplication are regulated by different mechanisms in response to spindle damage. EMBO J 18: 2707-2721 https://doi.org/10.1093/emboj/18.10.2707
  2. Bienkowska JR, Yu L, Rogers RG, Zarakhovich S, and Smith TF (2000) Protein fold recognition by total alignment probability. Proteins 40: 451-462 https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0134(20000815)40:3<451::AID-PROT110>3.0.CO;2-J
  3. Bienkowska JR, Hartman H, and Smith TF (2003) A search method for homologs of smal1 proteins. Ubiquitin-like proteins in prokaryotic cells? Protein Eng 16: 897-904 https://doi.org/10.1093/protein/gzg130
  4. Bloecher A, Venturi GM, and Tatchell K (2000) Anaphase spindle position is monitored by the BUB2 checkpoint. Nat Cell Biol 2: 556-558 https://doi.org/10.1038/35019601
  5. Cleveland DW, Mao Y, and Sullivan KF (2003) Centromeres and kinetochores: from epigenetics to mitotic checkpoint signaling. Cell 112: 407-421 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00115-6
  6. Cuif MH, Possmayer F, Zander H, Bordes N, Jollivet F, CouedelCourteille A, Janoueix-Lerosey I, Langsley G, Bornens M, and Goud B (1999) Characterization of GAPCenA, a GTPase activating protein for Rab6, part of which associates with the centrosome. EMBO J 18: 1772-1782 https://doi.org/10.1093/emboj/18.7.1772
  7. Fang G, Yu H, and Kirschner MW (1998) The checkpoint protein MAD2 and mitotic CDC20 form a ternary complex with the anaphasae initiation. Genes Dev 12: 1871-1883 https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.12.12.1871
  8. Furge KA, Wong K, Armstrong J, Balasubramanian M, and Albright CF (1998) Byr4 and Cdc16 form a two-component GTPase-activating protein for the Spgl GTPase that controls septation in fission yeast. Curr Biol 8: 947-954 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-9822(98)70394-X
  9. Gillett ES, Espelin CW, and Sorger PK (2004) Spindle checkpoint proteins and chromosome-microtubule attachment in budding yeast. J Cell Biol 164: 535-546 https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200308100
  10. Gruneberg U, Glotzer M, Gartner A, and Nigg EA (2002) The CeCDC-14 phosphatase is required for cytokinesis in the Caenorhabditis elegans embryo. J Cell Biol 158: 901-914 https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200202054
  11. Hoyt MA, Totis L, and Roberts BT (1991) S. cerevisiae genes required for cel1 cycle arrest in response to loss of microtubule function. Cell 66: 507-517 https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(81)90014-3
  12. Hwang LH, Lau LF, Smith DL, Mistrot CA, Hardwick KG, Hwang ES, Amon A, and Murray AW (1998) Budding yeast Cdc20: a target of the spindle checkpoint. Science 279: 1041-1044 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.279.5353.1041
  13. Ikui AE, Furuya K, Yanagida M, and Matsumoto T (2002) Control of localization of a spindle checkpoint protein, Mad2, in fission yeast. J Cell Sci 115: 1603-1610
  14. John B and Sali A (2004) Detection of homologous proteins by an intermediate sequence search. Protein Sci 13: 54-62 https://doi.org/10.1110/ps.03335004
  15. Jwa M and Song K (1998) Byr4, a dosage-dependent regulator of cytokinesis in S. pombe, interacts with a possible smal1 GTPase pathway including Spg1 and Cdc16. Mol Cells 8: 240-245
  16. Kaiser BK, Zimmerman ZA, Charbonneau H, and Jackson PK (2002) Disruption of centrosome structure, chromosome segregation, and cytokinesis by misexpression of human Cdc 14A phosphatase. Mol Biol Cell 13 : 2289-2300 https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.01-11-0535
  17. Kamath RS and Ahringer J (2003) Genome-wide RNAi screening in Caenorhabditis elegans. Methods 30: 313-321 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1046-2023(03)00050-1
  18. Kim J, Jeong J, and Song K (2004) The C-terminus of Bfal p in budding yeast is essential to induce mitotic arrest in response to diverse checkpoint-activating signals. Genes Cells 9: 399-418 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1356-9597.2004.00731.x
  19. Kitagawa R and Rose AM (1999) Components of the spindleassembly checkpoint are essential in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nat Cell Biol 1: 514-521 https://doi.org/10.1038/70309
  20. Li R (1999) Bifurcation of the mitotic checkpoint pathway in budding yeast. Proc Natl Aca Sci USA 96: 4989-4994 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.96.9.4989
  21. Li R and Murray AW (1991) Feedback control of mitosis in budding yeast. Cell 66: 519-531 https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(81)90015-5
  22. Liou RF and Blumenthal T (1990) Trans-spliced Caenorhabditis elegans mRNAs retain trimenthylguanosine caps. Mol Cell Biol 10: 1764-1768 https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.10.4.1764
  23. Pereira G, Hotken T, Grindlay J, Manson C, and Schiebel E (2000) The Bub2p spindle checkpoint links nuclear migration with mitotic exit. Mol Cell 6: 1-10 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1097-2765(00)00002-2
  24. Pereira G, Tanaka TU, Nasmyth K, and Schiebel E (2001) Modes of spindle pole body inheritance and segregation of the Bfa1p Bub2p checkpoint protein complex. EMBO J 20: 6359-6370 https://doi.org/10.1093/emboj/20.22.6359
  25. Schwab M, Lutum AS, and Seufert W (1997) Yeast Hctl is a regulator of Clb2 cyclin proteolysis. Cell 90: 683-693 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80529-2
  26. Van DK and Hirsh D (1998) Trans-spliced leader RNA exists as small nuclear ribonucleoproteins in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature 335: 556-559 https://doi.org/10.1038/335556a0
  27. Visintin R, Prinz S, and Amon A (1997) CDC20 and CDH1: a family of substrate-specific activators of APC-dependent proteolysis. Science 278: 460-463 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.278.5337.460
  28. Wang Y, Hu F, and Elledge SJ (2000) The Bfa1/Bub2 GAP complex comprises a universal checkpoint required to prevent mitotic exit. Curr Biol 10: 1379-1382 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-9822(00)00779-X
  29. Zachariae W, Schwab M, Nasmyth K, and Seufert W (1998) Control of cyclin ubiquitination by CDK-regulated binding of Hct1 to the anaphase promoting complex. Science 282: 1721-1724 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.282.5394.1721