International Journal of Quality Innovation

Korean Society for Quality Management (한국품질경영학회)
권호 표지

Boundless Technologies: Mind-setting Value Creations

  • Published : 2005.12.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Utilization of information and communication technologies is commonly accepted as important to value creation in the knowledge economy. Nevertheless, empirical findings from our business case studies often show that while sophisticated technological tools may be developed, the potentials are not realized. It is evident that technology is subject to adaptive and emergent strategies of use, diverging from the original intention. Within this space of opportunities, we elaborate the importance of constructing strategic concepts as communication tools to support organisational implementation of technologies. We use the concept of organisational implementation as a way of taking the technology into use in order to support changes and value creation in the user organisation. In this paper we present our findings related to how use and experiences are conditioned by the users' expectations. We have conducted a business case study in order to understand and explore how users employ and use a particular wireless technology infrastructure. On behalf of the infrastructure vendor, we have studied three different organisations that use this technology. The overall research goal of our joint research project was to find out what is good use and for whom. We find that users struggle to go beyond the expectations they had when they were conceptualising and telling us about their practice. We have good indications that a narrowed consciousness was also conditioning the users' use of the technology. In this paper we draw the conclusion that technological implementations towards changing work practices and value creation must not be viewed by the company solely as a knowledge acquisition process, but as a process of knowledge creation. Organisational implementation is an ongoing process, a learning process at both the organisational and individual level. Flexible tools and technologies are constituted and shaped in interaction and communication in the workplace. Based on that knowledge, we build up an argument for an organisational implementation framework, including strategic discussions, learning spaces, and concept constructions.

Keywords

References

  1. Alvesson, M.(1995), Management of Konwledge-Intensive Companies, Berlin. New York, Walter de Gruyter
  2. Argyris, C. and Schon, D.(1978), Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective. Reading, MA, USA, Addison Wesley
  3. Bansler, J.(1989), 'Systems Development Research in Scandinavia,' Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, pp. 3-20
  4. Basalla, G.(1988), The Evolution of Technology, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
  5. Bjorkeng, K. and Rolfsen, R. K.(2003), Playing the Dilemma: Dilemmas as an Instrument in System Development and Use, the Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), Big Island, Hawaii, IEEE
  6. Boland, R. J. J. and Tenkasi, R. V.(1995), 'Perspective Making and Perspective Taking in Communities of Knowing,' Organization Science, Vol. 6, No.4, pp. 350-372 https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.6.4.350
  7. Bodker, S. and Petersen, M. G.(2000), 'Design for learning in use,' Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, Vol. 12, pp. 61-80
  8. Carlsen, A., Klev, R. et al.(2004), Living Knowledge: Foundations and Framework, Living Knowledge, The Dynamics of Professional Service Work, A. C. R. K. G. v. Krogh. Hampshire, Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 1-19
  9. Davenport, T. H., Thomas, R. J. et al.(2002), 'The Mysterious Art and Science of Knowledge-Worker Performance,' MIT Sloan Management Review, Fall
  10. Ehn, P.(1992), Scandinavian Design: On Participation and Skill, Usability - Turning Technologies into Tools, P. S. Adler and T. A. Winograd. New York, USA, Oxford University Press
  11. Elden, M. and Levin, M.(1991), Co-generative Learning: Bringing Participation into Action Research, Participatory Action Research, W. F. Whyte. London, Sage, pp. 127-141
  12. Engestrom, Y.(1999), 'Expansive visibilization of work: An activity-theoretical perspective,' Computer-Supported Co-operative Work (CSCW), Vol. 8, pp. 63-93 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008648532192
  13. Erskine, L. E., Carter-Tod, D. R. N. et al.(1997), 'Dialogical Techniques for the Design of Web Sites,' International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, Vol. 47, pp. 169-195 https://doi.org/10.1006/ijhc.1997.0129
  14. Gjersvik, R. and Blakstad, S.(2004), Designing Knowledge Work Space: Archetypes of Professional Service Work as Tool for Change, Living Knowledge. The Dynamics of Professional Service Work. A. C. R. K. G. v. Krogh. Hampshire, Palgrave Macmillan
  15. Greenbaum, J.(1995), Windows on the Workplace, Monthly Review Press, New York
  16. Greenbaum. J. and Kyng, M.(1991), Introduction: Situated Design, Design at Work: Cooperative Design of Computer Systems, G. a. Kyng. New Jersey, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 1-25
  17. Grudin, J.(1988), Why CSCW Applications Fail: Problems in the Design and Evaluation of Organizational Interfaces, Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW'88)
  18. Grudin, J.(1994), 'Groupware and Social Dynamics - Eight Challenges for Developers,' Communications of the ACM, Vol. 37, No.1
  19. Grudin, J.(1994), 'Groupware and Social Dynamics: Eight Challenges for Developers,' Communications of the ACM, Vol. 37, No.1, pp. 92-105
  20. Hoyrup, S.(2004), 'Reflection as a core process in organisational learning,' The Journal of Workplace Learning, Vol. 16, No.8, pp. 442-254 https://doi.org/10.1108/13665620410566414
  21. Hakonsen, G. and Carlsen, A.(1999), Communities and Activity-systems in Knowledge Intensive Firms, Paper presented at International Conference on Management of Information and Communication Technology, Scandinavian Academy of Management, Copenhagen, Denmark
  22. Jorgensen, H. D., Krogstie, J. et al.(2004), 'Interactive Models for Tailorable and Evolving Information Systems,' Journal of Applied Systems Studies (JASS) , Vol. 5, No.1
  23. Karlsen, B. and Hoholm, T.(2004), Analytical skills in Action Research - training to make a different (hi)story?, Presented at 20th EGOS colloquium, Ljubljana University, Slovenia
  24. Kvalshaugen, R., Carlsen, A. et al.(2005), Archetypes of Activity Systems in Professional Service Work, Abstract accepted for he 21th EGOS conference, Freie Universitat Berlin, Germany
  25. Lowendahl, B.(2000), Strategic Management of Professional Service Firms, Copenhagen, Copenhagen Business School Press
  26. Lowendahl, B. R., Revang, O. et al.(2001), 'Knowledge and Value Creation in Professional Service Firms - A Framework for Analysis,' Human Relations, Vol. 54, No.7, pp. 911-931 https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726701547006
  27. Muller, M. J., Haslwanter, J. H. et al.(1997), Participatory Practices in the Software Lifecycle, In Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction, T. K. a. P. Helander, P. Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Elsevier Science B. V., pp. 255-297
  28. Nelson, R. R. and Winter, S. G.(1982), An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, Cambridge, Massachusetts and London, England, The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press
  29. Norman, D. A.(1990), The design of everyday things, New York, Doubleday
  30. Northouse, P. G.(2004), Leadership, Theory and Practice, Sage Publications
  31. Orlikowski, W. J.(1993). 'CASE Tools as Organizational Change: Investigating Incremental and Radical Changes in Systems Development,' MIS Quarterly, Vol. 17, No.3
  32. Rolfsen, R. K., Dahl, K. et al.(2004), Identifying Success Criteria for Sustainable eLearning Practice at Visma Services, Presented at Workplace Learning - from the Learners' Perspective, Copenhagen
  33. Rolfsen, R. K., Jorgensen, H. D. et al.(2004), Process-Integrated eLearning, Presented at Workplace Learning - from the Learners', Perspective, Copenhagen
  34. Rosemary, H.(2004), 'Emotional Intelligence: A Primal Dimension of Nursing Leadership?' Innovation in Leadership Nursing Leadership, Vol. 17, No.4
  35. Rosenberg, M.(2001), E-Learning: Strategies for Delivering Knowledge in the Digital Age, Columbus, USA, The McGraw Hill Companies, Inc
  36. Romboll-Management(2005), IT i praksis (IT in practice), Oslo, Romboll Management
  37. Schon, D. A.(1983), The Reflective Practitioner, Aldershot, UK, Ashgate Publishing Ltd
  38. Stabell, C. and Fjellstad, O.(1998), 'Configuring Value for Competitive Advantage: On Chains, Shops and Networks,' Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 19, pp. 413-437 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199805)19:5<413::AID-SMJ946>3.0.CO;2-C
  39. Sveiby, K.-E. and Risling, A.(1986), Kunskapsforetaket (The Know-How Company). Malmo, Sweden, Liber
  40. Truex, D. P., Baskerville, R. et al.(1999), 'Growing Systems in Emergent Organizations,' Communications of the ACM, Vol. 42, No.8, pp. 117-123 https://doi.org/10.1145/310930.310984
  41. Vos, P. G. J. C., J. J. van Meel, et al.(1997), The Office. The Whole Office and Nothing but the Office. A Framework of Workplace Concept, The Netherlands, Delft university of Technology, Department of Real Estate & Project Management
  42. Vygotsky, L. S.(1978), Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press. Published originally in Russian in 1930
  43. Winograd, T. and F. Flores(1986), Understanding Computers and Cognition, Addison-Wesley