Architectural research

  • 제7권2호
  • /
  • Pages.81-89
  • /
  • 2005
  • /
  • 1229-6163(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2383-5575(eISSN)
대한건축학회 (Architectural Institute of Korea)
권호 표지

Maintenance, Repair and Rehabilitation (MR&R) Practice for Concrete Bridge Decks

  • Hong, Tae Hoon (Construction Engineering & Management Research Department, Korea Institute of Construction Technology)
  • 투고 : 2005.08.01
  • 발행 : 2005.12.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Over the years, existing bridges have had various degrees of maintenance to extend the service life. As the existing bridges continue to deteriorate, however, each Department of Transportation (DOT) of the United States of America faces increasing demands on the limited funds available for bridge maintenance. Therefore, it is very important for State Department of Transportations to establish Maintenance, Repair, and Rehabilitation (MR&R) strategies for bridge structures such that funds get allocated for appropriate maintenance over the service life. This paper identifies the state-of-art and the state-of-practice of MR&R actions and the use of MR&R strategies in concrete bridge decks. In addition, a questionnaire survey was conducted to identify the type and timing for MR&R actions as well as existing MR&R strategies taken in concrete bridge deck by each DOT. This paper also presents the results of the survey.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO 1993). 'Guidelines for bridge management systems.' GBMS-1, Washington D.C.
  2. Brito, J. D., and Branco, F. A. (1998). 'Concrete Bridge Management: From Design to Maintenance.' Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction, ASCE, 3(2), 68-75 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0680(1998)3:2(68)
  3. Chase, S. B., and Washer, G. (1997). 'Nondestructive evaluation for bridge management in the next century.' Public Roads, July/August, pp.16-25
  4. Connecticut DOT. (2002). Manual of Organization, Functions and Procedures, Office of Maintenance and Highway Operations, Connecticut State Department of Transportation
  5. Das, P. C. (1999). 'Prioritization of bridge maintenance needs' [Monograph Chapter] Case Studies in Optimal Design and Maintenance Planning of Civil Infrastructure Systems, ASCE, 1999, pp.26-44.
  6. Estes, A C. Frangopol, D M. (2001) 'Minimum expected cost-oriented optimal maintenance planning for deteriorating structures: Application to concrete bridge decks' Reliability Engineering & System Safety. 73(3) p 281-291 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0951-8320(01)00044-8
  7. Frangopol, D. M., Enright, M. P., Gharaibeh, E and Estes, A. C. (1999) 'Towards optimal reliability-based bridge maintenance planning' [Monograph Chapter] Case Studies in Optimal Design and Maintenance Planning of Civil Infrastructure Systems, ASCE, 1999 pp.73-88.
  8. Hong, TaeHoon. (2003). 'Evaluation of Maintenance, Repair, and Rehabilitation strategy in concrete bridge deck.' M.S. Thesis, Purdue University, 2003
  9. Itoh, Y., and Liu, C. (1999). 'Multiobjective optimization of bridge deck maintenance' [Monograph Chapter] Case Studies in Optimal Design and Maintenance Planning of Civil Infrastructure Systems, ASCE, 1999, pp 136-151.
  10. Jacobs, T. L. (1992). 'Optimal long-term scheduling of bridge deck replacement and rehabilitation' Journal of Transportation Engineering. ASCE, 118(2), 312-322 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(1992)118:2(312)
  11. Liu, C., Hammad, A., and Itoh, Y. (1997). 'Maintenance strategy optimization of bridge decks using genetic algorithm.' Journal of Transportation Engineering, ASCE, 123(2), 91-100 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(1997)123:2(91)
  12. Markow, M. J. (1994). 'Optimal rehabilitation times for concrete bridge decks' Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 79-89
  13. NYDOT. (1997). 'Fundamentals of Bridge Maintenance and Inspection' Transportation Maintenance Division, Structures Design and Construction Division. New York State Department of Transportation
  14. Purvis, R. L. (2000). 'Integrating Preventive Maintenance Management into BMS' Transportation Research Circular No: 498. Transportation Research Board, pp.1-14
  15. Ramey, G. E., and Wright, R. L. (1996). 'Durability Performances of Alabama Bridge Components and Subcomponents', Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction, ASCE, 2(3), 139-149
  16. Ramey, G. E., Wolff, A. R., and Wright, R. L. (1997) 'DOT management actions to enhance bridge durability/longevity' Practice Periodical on Structural Design & Construction, ASCE, 2(3), 125-130 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0680(1997)2:3(125)
  17. Roberts, J. E., and Shepard, R. (2001). 'Bridge management for the 21st century' Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering. V 4337, 48-59
  18. Saito, M. and Sinha, K. C. (1990). 'Time for Bridge Replacement, Rehabilitation, and Maintenance' Transportation Research Record n.1268, pp. 75-83
  19. Tonias, D. (1995) Bridge Engineering; Design, Rehabilitation, and Maintenance of modern highway bridges. McGraw-Hill, NY, NY