Development of a Guided Wave Technique for the Inspection of a Feeder Pipe in a Pressurized Heavy Water Reactor

  • Cheong, Yong-Moo (Division of Nuclear Materials Technology Development, Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute) ;
  • Lee, Dong-Hoon (Division of Nuclear Materials Technology Development, Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute) ;
  • Kim, Sang-Soo (Division of Nuclear Materials Technology Development, Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute) ;
  • Jung, Hyun-Kyu (Division of Nuclear Materials Technology Development, Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute)
  • Published : 2005.06.01

Abstract

One of the recent safety issues in the pressurized heavy water reactor (PHWR) is the cracking of the feeder pipe. Because of the limited accessibility to the cracked region and a high dose of radiation exposure, it is difficult to inspect all the pipes with the conventional ultrasonic method. In order to solve this problem, a long-range guided wave technique has been developed. A computer program to calculate the dispersion curves in the pipe was developed and the dispersion curves for the feeder pipes in PHWR plants were determined. Several longitudinal and/or flexural modes were selected from the review of the dispersion curves and an actual experiment has been carried out with the specific alignment of the piezoelectric ultrasonic transducers. They were confirmed as L(0,1)) and/or flexural modes(F(m,2)) by the short time Fourier transformation(STFT) and were sensitive to the circumferential cracks, but not to the axial cracks in the pipe. An electromagnetic acoustic transducers(EMAT) was designed and fabricated for the generation and reception of the torsional guided wave. The axial cracks were detected by a torsional mode(T(0,1)) generated by the EMAT.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : Ministry of Science and Technology

References

  1. J. L. Rose, Ultrasonic Waves in Soild Media, Cambridge University Press, 1999
  2. D. C. Gazis, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 31(5), 568 (1959)
  3. J. J. Ditri and J. L. Rose, J. Appl. Phys. 72(7), 2589 (1992)
  4. J. J. Ditri, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 96, 3769 (1994)
  5. J. L. Rose, J. J. Ditri, A. Pilarski, K. M. Rajana, and F. Carr, NDT & E Int., 27(6), 307 (1994)
  6. H. Kwun and K. A. Bartels, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 99(2), 962 (1996) https://doi.org/10.1121/1.414628
  7. D. N. Allyne and P. Cawley, J. NDE, 15(1), 11 (1996)
  8. H. J. Shin and J. L. Rose, J. NDE, 17(1), 27 (1998)
  9. Hyeon-Jae Shin and J. L. Rose, J. Korean Soc. NDT, 20(1), 1 (2000), in Korean
  10. Sung-Jin Song, Joon-Soo Park, and Hyeon-Jae Shin, J. Korean Soc. NDT, 21(4), 406 (2001), in Korean
  11. Y. Cho and J. L. Rose, Nondestr. Test & Eval. 12, 323 (1996)
  12. J. Li and J. L. Rose, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 109(2), 457 (2001) https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4734358
  13. A. Demma, P. Cawley, and M. J. S. Lowe, Review of Progress in Quantitative NDE, 21, p.157 D. O. Thompson and D. E. Chimenti (eds), American Institute of Physics, 2002
  14. J. L. Rose and X. Zhao, Mater. Eval., p.621 (2001)
  15. R. B. Thompson, Review of Progress in Quantitative NDE, 16(A), 121 (1997)
  16. G. A. Alers, Nondestructive testing handbook, 7 ultrasonic testing, p.326 ASNT, Columbus OH, 2nd ed., 1991
  17. M. Hirao and H. Ogi, NDT&E International, 32, 127 (1999)