DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Use of Semi-active Tuned Mass Dampers for Vibration Control under Various Excitations

다양한 하중의 진동제어를 위한 준능동 TMD의 이용

  • 김현수 (성균관대학교 건축공학과) ;
  • 김승준 (성균관대학교 건축공학과) ;
  • 이동근 (성균관대학교 건축공학과)
  • Published : 2006.02.28

Abstract

To dale, lots of types of tuned mass dampers are developed and investigated to reduce dynamic responses of a structure due to various causes. In this study, control performance of semi-active tuned mass damper(STMD), that can change the damping of tuned mass damper in real time based on structural responses, was investigated with respect to various types of excitation employing numerical simulation. Skyhook control algorithm was used to appropriately modulate the damping ratio of semi-active damper that composes STMD. The control effectiveness of a STMD under harmonic and random excitation were evaluated using a single-degree-of-freedom (SDOF) structure in comparison with a conventional passive tuned mass damper (TMD). The robustness of a STMD and a passive TMD were compared along with the variation of the mass of a SDOF structure. The control performance of STMD using magnetorheological (MR) damper was also investigated in this study. Based on the numerical studios, it was shown that the control effectiveness of the STMD was significantly superior to that of a passive TMD with respect to harmonic and random excitation.

다양한 원인에 의해서 발생하는 구조물의 동적응답을 감소시키기 위하여 현재까지 여러 가지 형태의 동조질량감쇠기(Tuned Mass Damper; TMD)가 개발되었고 이에 대한 많은 연구가 수행되어 왔다. 본 연구에서는 구조물의 응답에 따라서 실시간으로 TMD의 감쇠를 변화시킬 수 있는 준능동 TMD(Semi-active TMD; STMD)의 제어성능을 다양한 형태의 하중을 적용하여 해석적으로 검토하였다. STMD를 구성하는 준능동 감쇠기의 감쇠력을 조절하기 위하여 skyhook 제어알고리즘을 이용하였다. 조화하중 및 임의의 동적하중을 직접가력하중과 지반진동하중 형태로 단자유도 구조물에 가하여 STMD와 일반적인 TMD의 제어성능을 비교하였다. 또한, 주구조물의 질량의 변화에 따른 TMD 및 STMD의 제어성능의 견실성을 비교하였다. 그리고, 가변감쇠장지 뿐만 아니라 MR 감쇠기를 사용한 STMD의 제어성능도 평가하여 새로운 진동제어장치로서의 활용가능성을 검토하였다. 수치해석을 수행한 결과 STMD는 TMD에 비하여 조화하중 및 임의의 동적하중에 대해서 매우 뛰어난 제어성능을 보이는 것을 확인할 수 있었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Kareem, A. and Kijewski, T., 'Mitigation of motions of tall buildings with specific examples of recent applications,' Wind and Structures, Vol. 2, No.3, 1999, pp.201-251 https://doi.org/10.12989/was.1999.2.3.201
  2. Nishitani, A. and Inoue, Y., 'Overview of the application of active/semiactive control to building structures in Japan,' Earthquake Engrg. and Struct. Dyn., Vol. 30, 2001, pp. 1565-1574 https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.81
  3. Dyke,S.J., 'Current directions in structural control in the US,' 9th World Seminar on Seismic Isolation, Energy Dissipation and Active Vibration Control of Structures, Kobe, Japan, June 13-16, 2005, pp. 1-22
  4. Hausner, G.W., Bergman, L.A., Caughey, T.K., Chassiakos, A.G., Claus, R.O., Masri, S.F., Skelton, R.E, Soong, T.T., Spencer, B.H. and Yao, T.P., 'Structural control; Past, Present, and Future,' ASCE, Journal of Engineering Mechanics, Vol. 123, No.9, 1997, pp. 897-971 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1997)123:9(897)
  5. Ricciardelli, F, Pizzimenti, A.D. and Mattei, M, 'Passive and active mass damper control of the response of tall buildings to wind gustiness,' Engineering Structures, Vol. 25, No.9, 2003, pp. 1199-1209 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(03)00068-3
  6. Desu, N.B., Deb, S.K. and Dutta, A., 'Coupled tuned mass dampers for control of coupled vibrations in asymmetric buildings,' Structural Control and Health Monitoring, 2005
  7. Pinkaew, T., Lukkunaprasit, P. and Chatupote, P., 'Seismic effectiveness of tuned mass dampers for damage reduction of structures,' Engineering Structures, Vol. 25, No. 1, 2003, pp. 39-46 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(02)00115-3
  8. Yau, J.D. and Yang, Y.B., 'A wideband MTMD system for reducing the dynamic response of continuous truss bridges to moving train loads,' Engineering Structures, Vol. 26, No. 12, 2004, pp. 1795-1807 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2004.06.015
  9. Symans, M.D and Constantinou, M.C., 'Semi-active control systems for seismic protection of structures: a state-of-the-art review,' Engineering Structures, Vol. 21, 1999, pp. 469-487 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(97)00225-3
  10. Jansen, L.M. and Dyke, S.J., 'Semiactive Control Strategies for MR Dampers: Comparative Study,' Journal of Engineering Mechanics, ASCE, Vol. 126, No.8, 2000, pp. 795-803 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2000)126:8(795)
  11. Hrovat, D, Barak, P. and Rabins, M., 'Semi-active versus passive or active tuned mass damper for structural control,' ASCE, Journal of Engineering Mechanics, Vol. 190, No.3, 1983, pp.691-705
  12. Agrawal, A. K. and Yang, J. N., 'Semiactive control strategies for building subject to near-field earthquakes,' Proceedings of SPIE, 2000, pp. 359-370
  13. Abe, M. and Igusa, T., 'Semiactive Dynamic Vibration Absorbers for Controlling Transient Response,' Journal of Sound and Vibration, 198(5), 1996, pp. 547-569 https://doi.org/10.1006/jsvi.1996.0588
  14. Hidaka, 5., Ahn, Y. K., and Morishita,S., ' Adaptive Vibration Control by a Variable-Damping Dynamic Absorber Using ER Fluid,' Journal of Vibration and Acoustics, Vol. 121, 1999, pp. 373-378 https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2893990
  15. Pinkaew, T. and Fujino, Y., 'Effectiveness of semi-active tuned mass dampers under harmonic excitation,' Engineering Structures, Vol. 23, 2001, pp. 850-856 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(00)00091-2
  16. Warburton, G.B., 'Optimum absorber parameters for various combinations of response and excitation parameters,' Earthquake Engrg. and Struct. Dyn., Vol. 10, 1982, pp. 381-401 https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290100304
  17. Karnopp, D., Crosby M.J. and Harwood R.A., 'Vibration control using semi-active force generators,' J. of Engineering for Industry, ASME, Vol. 96, No.2, 1974, pp.619-626 https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3438373
  18. Spencer, B.F. Jr., Dyke, S.J., Sain, M.K. and Carlson, J.D., 'Phenomenological model for magnetorheological dampers,' J. of Engineering Mechanics, ASCE, Vol.123, No.3, 1997, pp.230-238 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1997)123:3(230)