A SYSTEMATIC IMPLANT TREATMENT PLANNING AND CONCEPTS FOR CLINICAL SUCCESS

체계적인 임플랜트 치료 계획의 수립과 성공적인 임상을 위한 컨셉트

  • Jeong Seung-Mi (Department of Dentistry, College of Wonju Medicine, Yonsei University) ;
  • Kim Se-Hoon (Department of Dentistry, College of Wonju Medicine, Yonsei University) ;
  • Yoo Je-Hyeon (Department of Dentistry, College of Wonju Medicine, Yonsei University)
  • 정승미 (연세대학교 원주의과대학 치과학교실) ;
  • 김세훈 (연세대학교 원주의과대학 치과학교실) ;
  • 유지현 (연세대학교 원주의과대학 치과학교실)
  • Published : 2006.04.01

Abstract

Statement of problem: It is important to have a correct presurgical treatment plan before any implant surgery. It must contain substantial information about the patient concerned. However, the standard classification only notifies the dentist about various structural, pathological and physiological dimensions Due to diverse structure of the jaw bone, current standard classification does not tell spatial dimensions of the available bone for implant insertion sites. Purpose of study: The purpose of this study is to report the establishment of the systematic implant treatment plan and its clinical treatment using $Implan^(R)$ program which is based on ASCIi-classification that is available for future diagnosis and scale of treatment and for systematic implant insertion. Results: By assisting the systemic measurement of the available alveolus dimension during implant surgery, it was easy to set initial implant treatment plan. Conclusion: Using $Implan^(R)$ program which is based on ASCIi-classification system that allows the establishment of systemic implant treatment plan and successful clinical performance, it was possible to establish the founding or initial implant treatment plan , the acquisition of information, and the systematization of documentation.

Keywords

References

  1. Atwood DH. Reduction of residual ridges in the partially edentulous patient. Dent Clin North Am 1973: 17(4) :754-54
  2. Lekholm U, Zarb GA. Patient selection and preparation. in Branemark P-I, Zarb GA. Albrektsson T(eds) : Tissue-Integrated Prosthses. Chicago, Quintessence Publ Co, 1985: 195-205
  3. Cawood JI, Howell RA. A classification of edentulous jaws. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1988:17:232-6 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0901-5027(88)80047-X
  4. Misch CE. Divisions of available bone. Contemporary Implant Dentistry. Mosby. St. Louis(u.a) 1993
  5. Engelke W. Schwarzwalder W, Nuelsen M. Radiologische Querschnittuntersuchung zur Kieferkammhoehe im posterioren Oberkiefer. ZZahnaerztliche Implantol 1997: 13: 235-240
  6. Jeong SM. Vergleichende Untersuchungen zuklinischen Spaetresultaten enossaler Implantate mitund ohne primaere Aalveolarexten-sionsplastikmit Mikroplattenosteosynthese im Oberkiefer. Med. Diss. Goettingen, 1996
  7. Engelke W in: Hille R, Ryguschik U. Die Optimierung des Langzeiterfolges aus chirurgischer und prothetischer Sicht. Implantologie Journal 1998; 1: 60
  8. Haas R. Kaplan-Meier-Vergleichsanalyse von 3000 gesetzten Implantaten. Jahrbuch fuer orale Implantologie. Quintessenz 1994:213-225
  9. Nuelsen M. Radiologische Querschnittuntersuchung zur vertikalen Implantatlagerdimension (VILD) von Oberkiefer und Unterkiefer. Goettingen 1999