DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Optimal assessment and location of tuned mass dampers for seismic response control of a plan-asymmetrical building

  • Desu, Nagendra Babu (Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology) ;
  • Dutta, Anjan (Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology) ;
  • Deb, S.K. (Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology)
  • Received : 2006.01.09
  • Accepted : 2007.01.04
  • Published : 2007.07.10

Abstract

A bi-directional tuned mass damper (BTMD) in which a mass connected by two translational springs and two viscous dampers in two orthogonal directions has been introduced to control coupled lateral and torsional vibrations of asymmetric building. An efficient control strategy has been presented in this context to control displacements as well as acceleration responses of asymmetric buildings having asymmetry in both plan and elevation. The building is idealized as a simplified 3D model with two translational and a rotational degrees of freedom for each floor. The principles of rigid body transformation have been incorporated to account for eccentricity between center of mass and center of rigidity. The effective and robust design of BTMD for controlling the vibrations in structures has been presented. The redundancy of optimum design has been checked. Non dominated sorting genetic algorithm (NSGA) has been used for tuning optimum stages and locations of BTMDs and its parameters for control of vibration of seismically excited buildings. The optimal locations have been observed to be reasonably compact and practically implementable.

Keywords

References

  1. Abe, M. and Fujino, Y. (1994), 'Dynamic characteristics of multiple tuned mass dampers and some design formulas', Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 23, 813-835 https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290230802
  2. Ahlawat, A.S. and Ramaswamy, A. (2003), 'Multi-objective optimal absorber system for torsionally coupled seismically excited structures', Eng. Struet., 25, 941-950 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(03)00038-5
  3. Chen, G. and Wu, J. (2001), 'Optimal placement of multiple tune mass dampers for seismic structures', J. Struet. Eng., ASCE, 127(9), 1054-1062 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2001)127:9(1054)
  4. Chen, G. and Wu, J. (2003), 'Experimental study on multiple tuned mass dampers to reduce seismic responses of a three-storey building structure', Earthq. Eng. Struet. Dyn., 32, 793-810 https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.249
  5. Desu, N.R, Deb, S.K. and Dutta, A. (2006), 'Coupled tuned mass dampers for control of coupled vibrations in asymmetric building', J. Struet. Control Health Monitoring, 13, 897-916 https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.64
  6. Fonseca, C.M. and Fleming, P.J. (1993), 'Genetic algorithms for multi-objective optimization: Formulation, discussion and generalization', Proc. of the Fifth Int. Conf. on Genetic Algorithms, Los Altos, (CA): University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Morgan Kauman
  7. Hajela, P. and Lin, C.Y. (1992), 'Genetic search strategies in multi-criterion optimal design', Struct. Optimization, 4, 99-107 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01759923
  8. Hoang, N. and Warnitchai, P. (2004), 'Design of multiple tuned mass dampers by using a numerical optimizer', Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 34, 125-144 https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.413
  9. Jangid, R.S. (1999), 'Optimum multiple tuned mass dampers for base-excited undamped system', Earthq. Eng. Struet. Dyn., 28, 1041-1049 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199909)28:9<1041::AID-EQE853>3.0.CO;2-E
  10. Jangid, R.S. and Datta, T.K. (1997), 'Performance of multiple tuned mass dampers for torsionally coupled system', Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 26, 307-317 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199703)26:3<307::AID-EQE639>3.0.CO;2-8
  11. Joshi, A.S. and Jangid, R.S. (1997), 'Optimum parameters of multiple tuned mass dampers for base excited damped systems', J. Sound Vib., 202(5), 657-667 https://doi.org/10.1006/jsvi.1996.0859
  12. Li, C. (2000), 'Performance of multiple tuned mass dampers for attenuating undesirable oscillations of structures under the ground acceleration', Earthq. Eng. Struet. Dyn., 29, 1405-1421 https://doi.org/10.1002/1096-9845(200009)29:9<1405::AID-EQE976>3.0.CO;2-4
  13. Li, C. (2002), 'Multiple active-passive tuned mass dampers for structures under ground excitation', Earthq. Eng. Struet. Dyn., 32, 949-964
  14. Li, C. (2002), 'Optimum multiple tuned mass dampers for structures under the ground acceleration based on DDMF and ADMF', Earthq. Eng. Struet. Dyn., 31, 897-919 https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.128
  15. Li, C. and Qu, W. (2006), 'Optimum properties of multiple tuned mass dampers for reduction of translational and torsional response of structures subject to ground acceleration', Eng. Struet., 28,472-494 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.09.003
  16. Muhammad, N.S. Hadi and Arfiadi, Y. (1998), 'Optimum design of absorber for MDOF structures', J. Struet. Eng., ASCE, 124(11), 1272-1280 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1998)124:11(1272)
  17. Park, J. and Reed, D. (2001), 'Analysis of uniformly distributed mass dampers under harmonic and earthquake excitation', Eng. Struet., 23, 802-814 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(00)00095-X
  18. Rana, R. and Soong, T.T. (1998), 'Parametric study and simplified design of tuned mass dampers', Eng. Struct., 20, 193-204 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(97)00078-3
  19. Sarbjeet, S. and Dutta, T.K. (1998), 'Open-closed-loop linear control of building frames under seismic excitation', J. Struct. Eng., ASCE, 124(1), 43-51 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1998)124:1(43)
  20. Singh, M.P., Singh, S. and Moreschi, L.M. (2002), 'Tuned mass dampers for response control of torsional buildings', Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 31, 749-769 https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.119
  21. Srinivas, N. and Deb, K. (1993), 'Multiobjective. Optimization using non-dominated sorting in genetic algorithms', Technical Report, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur, India
  22. Wong, K.K.F. and Chee, Y.L. (2003), 'Energy dissipation of tuned mass dampers during earthquake excitations', Struct. Design Tall Special Build., 12, 105-121
  23. Xu, K. and Igusa, T. (1992), 'Dynamic characteristics of multiple substructures with closely spaced frequencies', Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 21, 1059-1070 https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290211203
  24. Yamaguchi, H. and Harnpomchai, N. (1993), 'Fundamental characteristics of multiple tuned mass dampers for suppressing harmonically forced oscillations', Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 22, 51-61 https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290220105

Cited by

  1. Optimality criteria based seismic design of multiple tuned-mass-dampers for the control of 3D irregular buildings vol.8, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2015.8.1.077
  2. Research developments in vibration control of structures using passive tuned mass dampers vol.44, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arcontrol.2017.09.015
  3. Closed-form optimum tuning formulas for passive Tuned Mass Dampers under benchmark excitations vol.17, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2016.17.2.231
  4. Seismic Energy Assessment of Buildings with Tuned Vibration Absorbers vol.2018, pp.1875-9203, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/2051687
  5. Optimum Tuning of Passive Tuned Mass Dampers for the Mitigation of Pulse-Like Responses vol.140, pp.6, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4040475
  6. Topology optimization of the structure using multimaterial inclusions vol.33, pp.3, 2009, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2009.33.3.285
  7. Experimentally validated FEA models of HF2V damage free steel connections for use in full structural analyses vol.37, pp.4, 2007, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2011.37.4.385