한국지진공학회논문집 (Journal of the Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea)

  • 제11권2호
  • /
  • Pages.47-56
  • /
  • 2007
  • /
  • 1226-525X(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2234-1099(eISSN)
한국지진공학회 (Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

준능동 동조질량감쇠기의 탄성 및 비탄성 지진응답 제어성능 평가

Performance Evaluation of Semi-Active Tuned Mass Damper for Elastic and Inelastic Seismic Response Control

  • 이상현 (단국대학교 건축대학 건축공학과) ;
  • 정란 (단국대학교 건축대학 건축공학과) ;
  • 우성식 (단국대학교 건축대학 건축공학과) ;
  • 조승호 (단국대학교 건축대학 건축공학과)
  • 발행 : 2007.04.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구에서는 지진하중을 받는 탄성 및 비탄성 구조물에 대하여 수동 및 준능동 TMD의 지진응답제어성능을 평가하였다. 먼저 기존의 연구에서 제안된 식을 사용하여 최적 설계된 수동형 TMD와 본 연구에서 제시된 준능동 TMB가 설치된 탄성 구조물의 변위스펙트럼을 구하였으며, 준능동 TMD가 TMD보다 작은 스트로크를 가지고도 최대변위응답제어에 있어 우수함을 확인하였다. 또한 구조물의 주기와 TMD의 주기가 일치하지 않은 경우의 성능저하에 대한 TMD의 강인성을 평가하였다. 최종적으로 Bouc-Wen 모델을 사용하여 모사된 비탄성이력 특성을 가지는 구조물에 대한 수치해석을 수행하였으며, 이를 통해 탄성구조물에 대하여 최적화된 수동형 TMD의 성능은 구조물 응답의 비탄성이력 부분이 증가함에 따라 크게 저하되는 반면 준능동 TMD는 수동형 TMD보다 약 15-40% 정도의 더 많은 응답감소효과를 가짐을 확인하였다.

In this study, tile performance of a passive tuned mass damper (TMD) and a semi-active tuned mass damper (STMD) was evaluated in terms of seismic response control of elastic and inelastic structures under seismic loads. First, elastic displacement spectra were obtained for the damped structures with a passive TMD, which was optimally designed using the frequency and damping ratio presented by previous study, and with a STMD proposed in this study. The displacement spectra confirm that STMD provides much better control performance than passive md with less stroke. Also, the robustness or the TMD was evaluated by off-tuning the frequency of the TMD to that of the structure. Finally, numerical analyses were conducted for an inelastic structure of which hysteresis was described by Bouc-Wen model and the results indicated that the performance of the passive TMD of which design parameters were optimized for a elastic structure considerably deteriorated when the hysteretic portion or the structural responses increased, while the STMD showed about 15-40% more response reduction than the TMD.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Den Hartog, J.P., Mechanical Vibrations, 4th edn, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1956
  2. Pinkaew, T. and Fujino, Y., 'Effectiveness of Semi-Active Tuned Mass Dampers Under Harmonic Excitation,' Engineering Structures, Vol. 23, 2001, pp. 850-856 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(00)00091-2
  3. Ricciardelli, F., Occhiuzzi, A. and Clemente, P., 'Semi-Active Tuned Mass Damper Control Strategy for Wind-Excited Structures,' Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, Vol. 88, 2000, pp. 57-74 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6105(00)00024-6
  4. Soong, T.T. and Dargush, G.F., Passive Energy Dissipation Systems in Structural Engineering, New York, John Wiley & Sons, 1997, 356
  5. Kwok, K.C.S. and Smali, B., 'Performance of Tuned Mass Dampers Under Wind Loads,' Engineering Structures, Vol. 17, No.9, 1995, pp. 655-667 https://doi.org/10.1016/0141-0296(95)00035-6
  6. Rana, R. and Soong, T.T., 'Parametric Study and Simplified Design of Tuned Mass Dampers,' Engineering Structures, Vol. 20, No.3, 1998, pp. 193-204 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(97)00078-3
  7. Tasi, H.C. and Lin, G.C., 'Optimum Tuned Mass Dampers for Minimizing Steady-State Response of Support Excited and Damped Systems,' International Journal of Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol. 22, 1993, pp. 957-973 https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290221104
  8. Setareh, M., 'Application of Semi-Active Tuned Mass Dampers to Base-Excited Systems,' International Journal of Earthquake Engineering and Stmctural Dynamics, Vol. 30, 2001, pp. 449-462 https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.19
  9. 김현수, 김승준, 이동근, '다양한 하중의 진동제어를 위한 준능 동 TMD의 이용', 한국지진공학회 논문집, 제10권, 제 1호, 2006, pp. 51-62 https://doi.org/10.5000/EESK.2006.10.1.051
  10. Gupta, Y.P. and Chandrasekaren, 'Absorber System for Earthquake Excitation,' Proc. 4th world conf. on Earthquake Engineering, Satiago, Chile, Vol. II, 1969, pp. 139-148
  11. Kaynia, A.M., Veneziano, D. and Biggs, J.M., 'Seismic Effectiveness of Tuned Mass Dampers,' J. Struct. div., ASCE 107, 1981, pp. 1465-1484
  12. Sadek, F., Mohraz, B., Taylor, A.W. and Chung,, R.M., 'A Method of Estimating the Parameters of Tuned Mass Dampers for Seismic Applications,' International Journal of Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol. 26, 1997, pp. 617-635 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199706)26:6<617::AID-EQE664>3.0.CO;2-Z
  13. whittaker, A., Constantinou, M., Tsopelas, P. 'Displacement Estimates for Performance-Based Seismic Design,' Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE 1998, 124, pp. 905-912 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1998)124:8(905)
  14. Yalla, S.K., 'Liquid Dampers for mitigation of structural response: Theoretical Development and Experimental validation,' Ph.D. Thesis, University of Notre Dame, 2001, 193
  15. Chopra, A.X., Dynamics of Structures: Theory and Applications to Earthquake Engineering, 2nd edition, New Jersey, Prentice Hall, 2001, 844
  16. Agrawal, A.K. and Yang, J.N., 'Serniactive control strategies for building subject to near- field earthquakes,' Proceedings of SPIE, 2000, pp. 359-370
  17. Dyke, S.J., Spencer, B.F.Jr., Sain, M.K. and Carlson, J.D., 'Modeling and control of magnrtorhrological dampers for seismic response reduction,' Smart Material and Structures, Vol. 5, 1996, pp. 565-575 https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/5/5/006
  18. Yamada, K. and Kobori, T., 'Control Algorithm for Estimating Future Responses of Active Variable Stiffuess Structure,' Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol. 24, 1995
  19. Applied Technology Council, 'Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete buildings,' Report ATC-40, 1996. 11