Study on Common Conceptual Terms as a Premise for Korean Classification of Disease in Oriental Medicine in Connection with ICD-10

ICD 연계 한의질병분류를 위한 전제로서의 공통개념어 연구

  • Chi, Gyoo-Yong (Department of Pathology, College of Oriental Medicine, Dongeui University)
  • 지규용 (동의대학교 한의과대학 병리학교실)
  • Published : 2008.08.25

Abstract

In order to classify diseases of oriental medicine in liaison with International Classification of Diseases, there should be intermediation and sharing concepts between the two in addition to proper classification. Classification units were settled for differentiation of diseases or syndromes first. And second, the standard forms of disease classification system were proposed. Third, this classification system was made of serial groupings of syndrome under the traditional disease name. Fourth, the location of disease and the interrelation between different syndromes were depicted with diagram in order to define more clearly. As the results and conclusion, The classification units were composed of 2 categories; topology, organ, meridian, somatic structure, body fluid units for description and various regulatory unit terms of western and traditional medicine for explanation. The mixed classification model of western diseases and traditional syndromes(證) was adopted as a fundamental classification system containing disease by exterior pathogen, systemic internal diseases, psychoneuronal diseases, metabolic diseases, diseases of sense organs, supportive structure diseases, obstetric-gynecology diseases, child diseases, 4-type constitutional diseases. And those were differentiated with generalized, localized, functional, oncogenic, environmental features in detail. The cause, site, condition, dispositions must be expressed in each disease name too. The types of diagnosis using classification system are principal and final diagnosis, principal procedure, main conditions, and these are applied to this Korean classification system equally. For more clarification of differentiation, a plane topological map and three dimensional coordinates were proposed to manifest the location, features and relation of disease itself or each other.

Keywords

References

  1. 신현규, 조경숙, 최선미. 한국표준질병사인분류(한의)의 질병분류체계에 대한 한의사의 인식도 조사, 동의생리병리학회지 15(3):373-379, 2001
  2. 양기상. 한의진단명과 진단요건의 표준화연구(I). 1995, 양기상. 한의진단명과 진단요건의 표준화연구(II). 1996, 신순식. 한의진단명과 진단요건의 표준화연구(III). 1997
  3. 대한한의사협회. 韓國標準疾病死因分類(韓醫). 대한한의사협회, 1994
  4. 홍준현, 김옥남, 조은희 공저. 질병분류: 사용지침서, 국제질병분류 제10차 개정판 한국표준질병사인분류 제3차 개정판. 수문사, 서울, I장, 2000
  5. 邓运起. 中医病症分类与代码"在临床的应用. 中国病案, pp 31-32, 2005
  6. 李正慧. 中医病症分类与代码应用分析. 光明中医, 17: 3-5, 2002
  7. 박경모, 신현규, 최선미. 한국표준질병사인분류(한의)의 분석과 개선안에 관한 연구. 대한한의학회지 21(3): 9-19, 2000
  8. 전국한의과대학 간계내과학교수 공저. 간계내과학. 동양의학연구원, 서울, pp 153-204, 1989
  9. 황의완, 김지혁 편저. 동의정신의학. 현대의학서적사, 서울, pp 111-181, 1987
  10. World Health Organization. WHO International Standard Terminologies on Traditional Medicine in the Western Pacific Region. World Health Organization, Nov., 2007
  11. 정우열. 동의보감(東醫寶鑑)의 질병분류에 대한 연구(1)-잡병편을 (雜病篇) 중심으로. 동의병리학회지 13(1):1-10, 1999
  12. 홍원식, 윤창열 편저. 증보중국의학사. 일중사, 서울, p 235, 403, 2001
  13. 中國醫學通史, TCM Online, www.cintcm.com/中醫歷史
  14. 李梴. 醫學入門. 大星文化社, 外集 1: 315, 318, 320