DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Antecedents and Consequences of Ethical Leadership in the Restaurant Industry -Focused on Ethical Context, Personality, and Job Satisfaction-

레스토랑에서의 윤리적 리더십에 관한 연구

  • Ha, Dong-Hyun (Department of Hotel.Convention Management, Dongguk University at Gyeongju) ;
  • Lim, Jung-Woo (Department of Hotel.Convention Management, Dongguk University at Gyeongju)
  • 하동현 (동국대학교 호텔.컨벤션경영학과) ;
  • 임정우 (동국대학교 호텔.컨벤션경영학과)
  • Published : 2008.10.30

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate how organization's ethical context, leader's agreeableness, conscientiousness and neuroticism affected his (or her) ethical leadership, and how leader's ethical leadership influenced subordinates' job satisfaction in the restaurant industry. The model was tested in hotel restaurants and family restaurants using a sample of employees in Pusan, Daegu and Gyeongsangbukdo. Empirical results confirmed that organization's ethical context, leader's agreeableness, conscientiousness and neuroticism influenced his (or her) ethical leadership, and leader's ethical leadership affected subordinates' job satisfaction. This research findings implied managerially that firstly, top management should establish employees' ethical regulations and motivate them to work ethically through training, incentives and punishment and secondly, should employee agreeable, conscientious and anti-neurotic person through aptitude test, if possible. In the future, restaurant's successful operations and management depends on partly its ethical status.

Keywords

References

  1. Ashkanasy NM, Windsor CA, Trevino, LK. 2006. Bad apples in bad barrels revisited: personal factors and organizationa rewards as determinants of managerial ethical decision-Making. Business Ethics Quarterly 16(4):449-474 https://doi.org/10.5840/beq200616447
  2. Babakus E, Cravens D, Johnston M, Moncrief, WC. 1999. The role of emotional exhaustion in sales force attitude and behavior relationship. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 27(1):58-70 https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070399271005
  3. Bass BM. 1985. Leadership and performance beyond expectations. Basic Books. New York
  4. Bono JE, Judge TA. 2004. Personality and transformational and transactional leadership: a meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology 89(5):901-910 https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.5.901
  5. Brown ME, Trevino LK. 2006. Ethical leadership: a review and future directions. The Leadership Quarterly 17(6):595-616 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.10.004
  6. Brown ME, Trevino LK, Harrison D. 2005. Ethical leadership: a social learning perspective for construct development and testing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 97(2):117-134 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.03.002
  7. Burns JM. 1978. Leadership. Harper & Row. New York
  8. Churchill GA, Ford NM, Walker OC. 1974. Measuring the job satisfaction of industrial salesmen. Journal of Marketing Research 11(1):103-118
  9. Costa PT, Jr., McCrae RR. 1988. From catalog to classification: Murray's needs and the Five-Factor Model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 55(2): 258-265 https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.55.2.258
  10. Costa PT, Jr., McCrae RR. 1992. Revisited NEO personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO five-factor inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. PAR. Odessa, FL
  11. Costa PT, Jr., McCrae RR, Dye DA. 1991. Facet scales for agreeableness and conscientiousness: a revision of the NEO Personality Inventory. Personality and Individual Difference 12(4):887-898 https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(91)90177-D
  12. Cullen JB, Parboteeah KP, Victor B. 2003. The effects of ethical climates on organizational commitment: a two-study analysis. Journal of Business Ethics 46(2):127-141 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025089819456
  13. De Hoogh Annebel HB, Den Hartog DN, Koopman PL. 2005. Linking the big five-factors of personality to charismatic and transactional leadership; perceived dynamic work environment as a moderator. Journal of Organizational Behavior 26(7):839-865 https://doi.org/10.1002/job.344
  14. Flannery BL, Mary DR. 2000. Larson. Environmental ethical decision-making in the U.S. metal-finishing industry. Academy of Management Journal 43(4): 642-662 https://doi.org/10.2307/1556359
  15. Fox J. 2000. Approaching managerial ethical standards in Croatia's hotel industry. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management 12(1):70-74 https://doi.org/10.1108/09596110010305172
  16. Hyman MR, Curran CM. 2000. The volitionist's manifesto. Journal of Business Ethics 23(3):323-337 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006218610190
  17. Hegarty WH, Sim Jr., HP. 1978. Some determinants of unethical decision behavior: an experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology 63(4):451-457 https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.63.4.451
  18. House RJ. 1977. A 1976 theory of charismatic leadership. in JG Hunt, LL Larson (Eds.), leadership: the cutting edge (pp. 189-207). Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press
  19. Judge TA, Bono JE. 2000. Five-factor model of personality and transformational leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology 85(5):751-765 https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.5.751
  20. Judge TA, Bono JE, Ilies R, Gerhardt, MW. 2002. Personality and leadership: a qualitative and quantitative review. Journal of Applied Psychology 87(4):765-780 https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.765
  21. Jun M, Cai S, Shin H. 2006. TQM practice in Maquiladora: antecedents of employee satisfaction and loyalty. Journal of Operations Management 24(6): 791-812 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2005.09.006
  22. Jung HS, Yoon HH. 2007. A study on the recognition on ethics management of employees in the foodservice industry. Korean Journal of Food Culture 22(1):58-69
  23. Lee CH, Goo JD. 2004. Effects of ethics management and job satisfaction according to individual characteristics of hotel employees. Journal of Tourism Studies 18(2):203-216
  24. Lowe KB, Kroeck KG, Sivasubramanian N. 1996. Effectiveness correlates of transformational and transactional leadership: a meta analytic review of the MLQ literature. The Leadership Quarterly 7(3):385-425 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(96)90027-2
  25. McCrae RR. 1996. Social consequences of experiential openness. Psychological Bulletin 120(3):323-337 https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.120.3.323
  26. McCrae RR, Costa PP, Jr. 1987. Validation of the Five-Factor Model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 52(1): 81-90 https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.1.81
  27. McCrae RR, Costa PT, Jr. 1991. Adding liebe und arbeid: the full Five-Factor Model and well-being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 17(3):227-232 https://doi.org/10.1177/014616729101700217
  28. Ogaard T, Marnburg E, Larsen S. in press. Perceptions of organizational structure in the hospitality industry: consequences for commitment, job satisfaction and perceived performance. Tourism Management 2007 Accepted
  29. Ross WT, Jr., Robertson DC. 2000. Lying: the impact of decision context, Business Ethics Quarterly 10(2):409-440 https://doi.org/10.2307/3857884
  30. Rubin RS, Munz DC, Brommer WH. 2005. Leading from within: the effects of emotion recognition and personality on transformational leadership behavior. Academy of Management Journal 48(5):845-858 https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2005.18803926
  31. Schermerhorn JR. 1982. Management for productivity. John Wiley and Sons, New York
  32. Tenbrunsel AE. 1998. Mispresentation and expectations of mispresentation in an ethical dilemma: the role of incentives and temptation. Academy of Management Journal 41(3): 330-339 https://doi.org/10.2307/256911
  33. Trevino LK. 1986. Ethical decision making in organizations: a person-situation interaction model. Academy of Management Review 11(3): 601-617 https://doi.org/10.2307/258313
  34. Trevino LK. 1990. A cultural perspective on changing organizational ethics, in R. Woodman & Passmore (Eds.). Research in Organizational Change and Development (195-230). JAI Press, Greenwich, CT
  35. Trevino LK, Brown M, Hartman LP. 2003. A qualitative investigation of perceived executive ethical leadership: perceptions from inside and outside the executive suite. Human Relations 56(1):5-37 https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726703056001448
  36. Trevino LK, Butterfield KD, Mcabe DM. 1998. The ethical context in organizations: influences on employee attitudes and behaviors. Business Ethics Quarterly 8(3):447-476 https://doi.org/10.2307/3857431
  37. Trevino LK, Nelson KA. 2007. Managing business ethics: straight talk about how to do it right (4th Ed.). Wiley, New York
  38. Trevino LK, Weaver GR, Gibson DG, Toffler BL. 1999. Managing ethics and legal compliance: what hurts and what works. California Management Review 41(2):131-151 https://doi.org/10.2307/41165990
  39. Trevino LK, Youngblood SA. 1990. Bad apples in bad barrels: a causal analysis of ethical decision-making behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology 75(4):378-385 https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.75.4.378
  40. Victor B, Cullen JB. 1988. The organizational bases of ethical work climates. Administrative Science Quarterly 33(1):101-125 https://doi.org/10.2307/2392857
  41. Woodman RW, Sawyer JE, Griffin RW. 1993. Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Academy of Management Review 18(2):293-321 https://doi.org/10.2307/258761
  42. Yoo YJ. 2000. A study on causal relationship between relationship marketing activities and relationship quality/performance in food service industry. Doctors degree thesis. Sejong University
  43. Yussen SR, Levy Jr., VM. 1975. Effects of warm and neutral models on the attention of observational learners. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 20(1):66-72 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0965(75)90027-2