Comparative Study on the Configuration Factors and Measurement Method of Yangsaeng Gigong and Psychological Skills Training

양생기공과 심리기술훈련의 구성요인과 측정평가방법의 비교 연구

  • 정미영 (동신한의원) ;
  • 한창현 (한국한의학연구원 의료연구부) ;
  • 박수진 (인제대학교 의과대학 약리학교실) ;
  • 이상남 (대구한의대학교 한의학과) ;
  • 권영규 (부산대학교 한의학전문대학원)
  • Published : 2008.10.25

Abstract

If we can evaluate the training results more appropriately and analyze the psychological changes in more objectively, the training can be more efficient and it can help to solve the problems during the training. This research analyzed the similarity and differences of Yangseng Qigong and psychological skill training's components and measurement methods. Also, the research further studied psychological skill training's measurement method. Results : The measurement type of Yangseng Qigong are Sagong, a record of Sagong, Damgong, IIgi, and Sogyeol. Similarly, the measurement type of psychological skills training are questionnaire, interview, personal profile, and observation of a single subject. Despite the similarities between the measurement type of Yangsaeng Qigong and psychological skills training, unfortunately there are differences in the contents. Thus, If we introduce strengths of each method to the other, we may have better measurement methods. The questionnaire method of psychological skills training is the most commonly used method, because it gives concrete, objective, reliable and highly reproducible results. If we refer to the questionnaire development process in psychological skills training, we can have objective and concrete measurement tool for Yangsaeng Qigong training. In the psychological skills training measurement tool development process, there are 5 stages; test conception, test preparation, test execution, question analysis, and test modification. Furthermore, the requirements for the good survey are reliability, validity, practicality, and cultural appropriateness. Through this study, we reached the conclusion that we need to combine two methods together to develop a better method because Yangsaeng Qigong places importance on comprehensive method and realization while psychological skills training places importance on analytical method and objective evaluation. And It seems that a practical study is needed to resolve the concerete problems of Yansaeng Qigong through these concrete cases.

Keywords

References

  1. 이명복, 기공이란 무엇인가. 서울, 장승, pp 173-174, 2003
  2. 조중현, 한국 전통사상을 중심으로 한 기공수련단체의 현황분석. 대구한의대학교 대학원 석사학위논문, 2007
  3. 방건웅. 기가 세상을 움직인다. 서울, 예인, pp 16, 132-134, 222-224, 225-226, 227-228, 2005
  4. 강효신, 이정호 공편석. 기공학. 서울, 일중사, pp 9, 133, 220-222, 1998
  5. 정청희. 운동수행 향상을 위한 심리기술훈련. 서울, 무지개사, p 10, 16, 25, 89, 2004
  6. 이찬. 태극권 강좌. 서울, 하남출판사, pp 54-55, 1992
  7. 손정희, 김나영. 방송공에 대한 고찰. 대한기공학회. 대한기공의학회지 2(2):71-73, 1998
  8. 김병현, 시함불안과 주의집중, 서울, 국민체육진흥공단 체육과학연구원, pp 191-193, 2003
  9. 문익수, 박정근, 최만식, 서지영. 스포츠 심리검사지. 서울 대한미디어, pp 3-22, 1996
  10. 정청희, 김병준. 스포츠심리학의 이해. 서울 금광, pp 219-212, 222, 223, 2006
  11. 유진. 스포츠 심리 측정 고찰. 한국스포츠심리학회편, '99동계 국제학술발표회 논문집, p 95, 2000
  12. 이강헌, 김병준, 안정덕. 스포츠심리검사 핸드북. 서울, 무지개사, pp 9-12, 2004