Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences

  • 제22권4호
  • /
  • Pages.465-470
  • /
  • 2009
  • /
  • 1011-2367(pISSN)
  • /
  • 1976-5517(eISSN)
아세아태평양축산학회 (Asian Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Lower Antibody Response in Chickens Homozygous for the Mx Resistant Allele to Avian Influenza

  • Qu, L.J. (State Laboratory for Agrobiotechnology and Department of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University) ;
  • Li, X.Y. (State Laboratory for Agrobiotechnology and Department of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University) ;
  • Xu, G.Y. (State Laboratory for Agrobiotechnology and Department of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University) ;
  • Ning, Z.H. (State Laboratory for Agrobiotechnology and Department of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University) ;
  • Yang, N. (State Laboratory for Agrobiotechnology and Department of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University)
  • 투고 : 2008.06.16
  • 심사 : 2008.10.05
  • 발행 : 2009.04.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

The chicken Mx gene has been regarded as a candidate gene for resistance to avian influenza virus (AIV). In this study, three groups of chickens with homozygotes (AA, GG) and heterozygotes (AG) of the resistant (A) and susceptible alleles (G) to AIV of the Mx gene were constructed from a line of dwarf egg-type chickens. These chickens were not examined for their resistant activities to AIV because the differential resistance had only been detected in vitro. The birds of the three groups were vaccinated with inactivated H5N2 AIV vaccine and the level of hemagglutination inhibition (HI) antibody to AIV was detected. The association between disease resistant activity to AIV and antibody response to AIV vaccination in the three groups was analyzed. The chickens with homozygous resistant allele A showed the lowest antibody levels, whereas the heterozygous chickens (AG) presented the highest antibody level after the boosting vaccination, which indicates that the efficiency of artificial selection on the resistant allele of Mx gene will be compromised since the homozygotes of the allele presented the weakest antibody response to the corresponding vaccine.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. An, B. K., B. L. Cho, S. J. You, H. D. Paik, H. I. Chang, S. W. Kim, C. W. Yun and C. W. Kang. 2008. Growth performance and antibody response of broiler chicks fed yeast derived $\beta$-glucan and single-strain probiotics. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 21:1027-1032
  2. Arnheiter, H. and O. Haller. 1983. Mx gene control of interferon action: different kinetics of the antiviral state against influenza virus and vesicular stomatitis virus. J. Virol. 47:626-630
  3. Bazzigher, L., A. Schwarz and P. Staeheli. 1993. No enhanced influenza virus resistance of murine and avian cells expressing cloned duck Mx protein. Virol. 195:100-112 https://doi.org/10.1006/viro.1993.1350
  4. Berlin, S., L. Qu, X. Li, N. Yang and H. Ellegren. 2008. Positive diversifying selection in avian Mx genes. Immunogenetics 60:689-697 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00251-008-0324-0
  5. Bernasconi, D., U. Schultz and P. Staeheli. 1995. The interferoninduced Mx protein of chickens lacks antiviral activity. J. Interferon Cytokine Res. 15:47-53 https://doi.org/10.1089/jir.1995.15.47
  6. Beuken, E., G. Grauls, C. A. Bruggeman and C. Vink. 1999. The rat cytomegalovirus R32 gene encodes a virion-associated protein that elicits a strong humoral immune response in infected rats. J. Gen. Virol. 80 (Pt 10):2719-2728
  7. Biozzi, G., D. Mouton, O. A. Sant'Anna, H. C. Passos, M. Gennari, M. H. Reis, V. C. Ferreira, A. M. Heumann, Y. Bouthillier, O. M. Ibanez, C. Stiffel and M. Siqueira. 1979. Genetics of immunoresponsiveness to natural antigens in the mouse. Curr. Top Microbiol. Immunol. 85:31-98
  8. Bucin, D., T. Lindholm and N. H. Persson. 1992. HLA-A region in highly sensitized patients: another immune response gene region. Exp. Clin. Immunogenet. 9:154-160 https://doi.org/10.1016/0306-9877(95)90086
  9. Dalgaard, T. S., S. Hojsgaard, K. Skjodt and H. R. Juul-Madsen. 2003. Differences in chicken major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class Ialpha gene expression between Marek's diseaseresistant and -susceptible MHC haplotypes. Scand. J. Immunol. 57:135-143
  10. Flex, A., E. Gaetani, R. Pola, R. Santoliquido, F. Aloi, P. Papaleo, A. Dal Lago, E. Pola, M. Serricchio, P. Tondi and P. Pola. 2002. The -174 G/C polymorphism of the interleukin-6 gene promoter is associated with peripheral artery occlusive disease. Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 24:264-268 https://doi.org/10.1053/ejvs.2002.1711
  11. Flohr, F., S. Schneider-Schaulies, O. Haller and G. Kochs. 1999. The central interactive region of human MxA GTPase is involved in GTPase activation and interaction with viral target structures. FEBS Lett. 463:24-28 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-5793(99)01598-7
  12. Haller, O., M. Frese and G. Kochs. 1998. Mx proteins: mediators of innate resistance to RNA viruses. Rev. Sci. Tech. 17:220-230
  13. Hou, Z. C., G. Y. Xu and Z. Su. 2007. Purifying selection and positive selection on the myxovirus resistance gene in mammals and chickens. Gene. 396:188-195
  14. Jansa, S. A., B. L. Lundrigan and P. K. Tucker. 2003. Tests for positive selection on immune and reproductive genes in closely related species of the murine genus mus. J. Mol. Evol. 56:294-307 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00239-002-2401-6
  15. Ko, J. H., A. Takada, T. Mitsuhashi, T. Agui and T. Watanabe. 2004. Native antiviral specificity of chicken Mx protein depends on amino acid variation at position 631. Anim. Genet. 35:119-122 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2052.2004.01096.x
  16. Ko, J. H., H. K. Jin, A. Asano, A. Takada, A. Ninomiya, H. Kida, H. Hokiyama, M. Ohara, M. Tsuzuki, M. Nishibori, M. Mizutani and T. Watanabe. 2002. Polymorphisms and the differential antiviral activity of the chicken Mx gene. Genome Res. 12:595-601
  17. Lee, S. H. and S. M. 2002. Vidal. Functional diversity of Mx proteins: variations on a theme of host resistance to infection. Genome Res. 12:527-530 https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.20102
  18. Leitner, G., Z. Uni, A. Cahaner, M. Gutman and E. D. Heller. 1992. Replicated divergent selection of broiler chickens for high or low early antibody response to Escherichia coli vaccination. Poult. Sci. 71:27-37 https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0710027
  19. Li, X. Y., L. J. Qu, J. F. Yao, L. J. Qu, J. F. Yao and N. Yang. 2006. Skewed allele frequencies of an Mx gene mutation with potential resistance to avian influenza virus in different chicken populations. Poult. Sci. 85:1327-1329
  20. McMichael, A. and J. Bell. 1991. HLA B27: a disease-associated immune response gene. Res. Immunol. 142:475-482 https://doi.org/10.1016/0923-2494(91)90050-S
  21. O'Connell, M. J. and J. O. McInerney. 2005. Gamma chain receptor interleukins: evidence for positive selection driving the evolution of cell-to-cell communicators in the mammalian immune system. J. Mol. Evol. 61:608-619 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00239-004-0313-3
  22. Pavlovic, J. and P. Staeheli. 1991. The antiviral potentials of Mx proteins. J. Interferon Res. 11:215-219 https://doi.org/10.1089/jir.1991.11.215
  23. Pevzner, I. Y., H. A. Stone and A. W. Nordskog. 1981b. Immune response and disease resistance in chickens. I. Selection for high and low titer to Salmonella pullorum antigen. Poult. Sci. 60:920-926 https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0600920
  24. Pevzner, I. Y., I. Kujdych and A. W. Nordskog. 1981a. Immune response and disease resistance in chickens. II. Marek's disease and immune response to GAT. Poult. Sci. 60:927-932 https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0600927
  25. Plant, K. P. and R. L. Thune. 2004. Cloning and characterisation of a channel catfish (Ictalurus punctatus) Mx gene. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 16:391-405 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsi.2003.07.001
  26. Quere, P., C. Rivas, K. Ester, K., Novak and W. L. Ragland. 2005. Abundance of IFN-alpha and IFN-gamma mRNA in blood of resistant and susceptible chickens infected with Marek's disease virus (MDV) or vaccinated with turkey herpesvirus; and MDV inhibition of subsequent induction of IFN gene transcription. Arch. Virol. 150:507-519 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00705-004-0435-3
  27. Rothman, J. H., C. K. Raymond, T. Gilbert, P. J. O'Hara and T. H. Stevens. 1990. A putative GTP binding protein homologous to interferon-inducible Mx proteins performs an essential function in yeast protein sorting. Cell 61:1063-1074 https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(90)90070-U
  28. Rund, D., I. Azar and O. Shperling. 1999. A mutation in the promoter of the multidrug resistance gene (MDR1) in human hematological malignancies may contribute to the pathogenesis of resistant disease. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 457:71-75
  29. SAS_Institute., Version 8.2. Cary. 2001
  30. Siegel, P. B. and W. B. Gross. 1980. Production and persistence of antibodies in chicken to sheep erythrocytes, 1. Directional selection. Poult. Sci. 59:1-5 https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0590001
  31. Staeheli, P. 1990. Interferon-induced proteins and the antiviral state. Adv. Virus Res. 38:147-200 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-3527(08)60862-3
  32. Staeheli, P., Y. X. Yu, R. Grob and O. Haller. 1989. A doublestranded RNA-inducible fish gene homologous to the murine influenza virus resistance gene Mx. Mol. Cell Biol. 9:3117-3121 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0145-305X(97)00019-0
  33. Steadham, E. M., S. J. Lamont, I. Kujdych and A. W. Nordskog. 1987. Association of Marek's disease with Ea-B and immune response genes in subline and F2 populations of the Iowa State S1 Leghorn line. Poult. Sci. 66:571-575 https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-2427(91)90013-3
  34. Vallender, E. J. and B. T. Lahn. 2004. Positive selection on the human genome. Hum. Mol. Genet. 13 Spec. No 2:R245-254 https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddh253
  35. van der Zijpp, A. J., K. Frankena and J. Boneschanscher. 1983. Genetic analysis of primary and secondary immune responses in the chicken. Poult. Sci. 62:565-572 https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0620565
  36. Wang, E. T., G. Kodama, P. Baldi and R. K. Moyzis. 2006. Global landscape of recent inferred Darwinian selection for Homo sapiens. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 103:135-140 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0509691102
  37. Weigend, S., N. Mielenz and S. J. Lamont. 1997. Application of a nonlinear regression function to evaluate the kinetics of antibody response to vaccines in chicken lines divergently selected for multitrait immune response. Poult. Sci. 76:1248-1255

피인용 문헌

  1. Insight into Alternative Approaches for Control of Avian Influenza in Poultry, with Emphasis on Highly Pathogenic H5N1 vol.4, pp.12, 2012, https://doi.org/10.3390/v4113179