Journal of the Korean Society of Physical Medicine (대한물리의학회지)

The Korean Society of Physical Medicine (대한물리의학회)
권호 표지

The Effect of Self-Controlled Knowledge of Result on Proprioception Learning in Knee Joint During Open and Closed Kinematic Chain Movement

자기통제 결과지식이 무릎 관절의 열린 사슬 자세와 닫힌 사슬 자세의 고유수용성감각의 장.단기적 학습에 미치는 영향

  • Published : 2009.05.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose：The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of self-controlled knowledge of result (KR) versus the yoked KR on learning of knee joint proprioception. Methods：Forty volunteer subjects (20 men and 20 women) were randomly assigned to each four groups: 1) self-controlled KR in open kinematic chain, 2) yoked KR in open kinematic chain, 3) self controlled KR in close kinematic chain, and 4) yoked KR in close kinematic chain. The difference between the angle of position and reproduction angle was determined as a proprioception error and measured using an angle reproduction test. The subjects in self-controlled groups were provided with feedback whenever they requested it, whereas the subjects in yoked groups were not provided with feedback. The data were analyzed using a one-way ANOVA. Results：The proprioception errors in close kinematic chain groups decreased significantly compared with those in close kinematic chain groups(p<.05). The proprioception errors in the self-controlled group decreased significantly compared with those in yoked groups during acquisition and retention test(p<.05). Conclusion：Self-controlled knowledge of result during open kinematic chain movement is considered to be a good method on motor learning.

Keywords

References

  1. Altman R, Asch E, Bloch D et al. Development of criteria for the classification and reporting of osteoarthritis. Arth Rheum. 1986;29:1039-49. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.1780290816
  2. Al-Zahrani KS, Bakheit AM. A study of the gait characteristics of patients with chronic osteoarthritis of the knee. Disabil Rehabil. 2002;24(5):275-80. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280110087098
  3. Baker V, Bennell K, Stillman B et al. Abnormal knee joint position sense in individuals with patello- femoral pain syndrome. J Orthopaed Res. 2002;20:208-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0736-0266(01)00106-1
  4. Barrack RL, Skinner HB, Cook SD et al. Effect of articular disease and total knee arthroplasty on knee joint position sense. J Neurophys. 1983;50:684-7. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.1983.50.3.684
  5. Birmingham TB, Kramer JF, Inglis JT et al. Effect aneoprene sleeve on knee joint position sence during sitting open kinetic chain and supine closed kinetic tests. Am Orth Society for Sports Med. 1998;26:562-6. https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465980260041601
  6. Butler M, Reeve T, Fischman M.. Effects of the instructional set in the bandwidth feedback paradigm on motor skill acquisition. Tes Q Exerc Sport. 1996;67(3):355-9. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.1996.10607964
  7. Camahan H, Vandervoort A, Swanson L. The influence of summary knowledge of results and aging on motor learning. Tes Q Exerc Sport. 1996;67(3):280-7. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.1996.10607955
  8. Chen D, Singer R. Self-regulation and cognitive strategies in sport participation. Int Sport Psychol. 1992;23:277-300.
  9. Davies GJ, Horch KW. Cappel L et al. The scientific and clinical rationale for the integrated approach to open and closed kinetic chain rehabilitation. Orthop Phys Ther Clin North Am. 2002;247:9-16.
  10. Felson DT, Zhang, Hannan MT et al. The incidence and natural history of knee osteoarthritis in the elderly. Arth Rheum. 1995;38:1500-5. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.1780381017
  11. Granger CV. Health accounting f- unctional assessment of long term patient. In: Kottke FJ, Leha mann JF, eds. Krusen's Handbook of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (4th ed). Phiadelphia, WB saunders. 1990:270-367.
  12. Heiderscheit BC, Rucinscki TJ. Biomechanical and physiologicbas is of closed kinetic chain exercise in the upper extremities. Orthop Phys Ther Clin North Am. 2000;9:209-1.
  13. Horn TS, Yark HJ. The effect of weight bearing on knee position sence. Phys Ther. 2003;9:479-84.
  14. Hogan N. The influence of age on weight-bearing joint reposition sence of the knee. Exp Brain Res. 2001;136:400-6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002210000595
  15. Janelle CM, Barba D, Frehlich S et al. Maximizing performance effectiveries through videotape replay and a self-controlled learning environment. Res Q Exerc Sport. 1997;68:269-79. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.1997.10608008
  16. Janelle CM, Kim J, Singer RN. Subject-controlled performance feedback and learning of a closed motor skill. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 1995;81:627-4. https://doi.org/10.1177/003151259508100253
  17. Jordan J, Luta G, Renner J et al. Knee pain and knee osteoarthritis severity in self-reported task specific disability: the Johnst on Country Osteoarthritis Project. J Rheumatol. 1997;24:1344-9.
  18. Lee T, Maraj B. Effects of bandwidth goals and bandwidth knowledge of results on motor learning. Res Q Exerc Sport. 1994;65(3):244-9. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.1994.10607625
  19. Lee HM. Evolution of knee proprio- ception after arthroscopic ACL reconstruction using bonepatellar-tendon-bone graft. J Med Sci. 1998;18:425-42.
  20. Lee HM, Liau JJ, Cheng, CK et al. Evaluation of shoulder proprioception following muscle fatigue. Clin Biomech. 2003;18:843-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0268-0033(03)00151-7
  21. Lephart SM, Woolacott DM, Rozzi SL, et al. Proprioception of the ankle and knee. Sports Med. 1998;25:149-55. https://doi.org/10.2165/00007256-199825030-00002
  22. Pai YC, Rymer WZ, Chang RW et al. Effect of age and osteoarthritis on knee propriception. Arthritis Rheum. 1997;40(12):2260-5. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.1780401223
  23. Palmitier RA, An KN, Scott SG et al. Kinetic chain exercise in knee rehabilitation. Sports Med. 1991;11(6):402-13. https://doi.org/10.2165/00007256-199111060-00005
  24. Prentice WE. Closed Kinematic Exercise: Rehabilitation(2nd ed). techniques in sports medicine. London, Mosby. 1994;98-107.
  25. Schmidt RA. Motor learning principles for physical therapy. In: Lister M. II Step Contemporary Management of Motor Control Problems. Alexandria, Va: Foun dation for Physical Therapy Inc. 1991;49-64.
  26. Schmidt RA. Motor Control and Learning (4th ed), Champaign, IL: Human Kinetic Publishers. 2005.
  27. Schmidt RN. Motor control and learning: A behavioral emphasIs Champaign: IL: Human Kinetics Publishers. 1988.
  28. Simmons RW, Smith K, Erez E et al. Balance retraining in a hemiparetic patient using center of gravity feedback: A single-case study. Percept Mot Skills. 1998;87:603-9. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1998.87.2.603
  29. Tayor RA. Knee position error detection in closed and open kinetic chain tasks suring concurrent cognitive distraction. J Sports Phys Ther. 1998;23:81-9.
  30. Voight ML, Hardin JA, Blackburn TA et al. The effects of muscle fatigue on and the relation ship of arm dominance to shoulder proprioception. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1996;23:348-52. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.1996.23.6.348
  31. Winstein CJ. Motor learning considerations in stroke rehabilitation. In: Duncan PW, Badke MB, eds. Stroke Rehabilitation: The Recovery of Motor Control. Chicago. Year Book Medical Publishers Inc. 1987;109-34.
  32. Wulf G, Schmidt RA, Deubel H. Reduced feedback frequency enhances generalized motor program learning but not parameterization learning. Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1993;19(5):1134-50. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.19.5.1134
  33. Wulf G, Clauss A, Shea CH et al. Benefits of self-controled in dyad practice. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport. 2001;72(3):299-303. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2001.10608964
  34. Wulf G, Toole T. Physical assistance devices in complex motor skill learning: Benefits of a selfcontrolled practice schedule. Res Q Exerc Sport. 1999;70:265-72. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.1999.10608045