Nutrition Research and Practice

The Korean Nutrition Society (한국영양학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Using metaphorical techniques in focus groups to uncover mothers' feelings about family meals

  • Kling, Leslie (Clinical Dietitian, Roxborough Memorial Hospital) ;
  • Cotugna, Nancy (Department of Health, Nutrition and Exercise Sciences, University of Delaware) ;
  • Snider, Sue (Department of Animal and Food Sciences, University of Delaware) ;
  • Peterson, P. Michael (Department of Health Promotion Program, University of Delaware)
  • Published : 2009.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Traditional nutrition education has not been shown to consistently produce behavior change. While it has been suggested that using emotion-based messages may be a better way to influence nutrition behavior change, this has not been well tested. Producing emotion-based messages is a multi-step process that begins with exploring subconscious barriers to behavior change rather than the more obvious and typically reported barriers. The purpose of this research was to uncover the emotional reasons, sometimes referred to as emotional pulse points, for mothers' choosing or not choosing to have more family meals. This would then serve as the first step to developing emotion-based messages promoting the benefits of family meals. Five focus group interviews were conducted with 51 low-income Black (n=28) and white (n=23) mothers. Metaphorical techniques were used to determine underlying feelings toward family and family meals. Discussions were video-taped, transcribed, and manually analyzed using a content-driven, immersion/crystallization approach to qualitative data analysis. Four themes emerged around the definition of family: acceptance, sharing, chaos, and protective/loyal. Some mothers felt mealtime was merely obligatory, and described it as stressful. Some reported a preference for attending to their own needs instead of sitting down with their children, while others felt that mealtime should be used to interact with and educate children and felt guilty when they were not able to provide family meals. Three themes emerged around feelings towards having or not having family meals: unimportant, important, and guilty. When explored further, mothers indicated that using the feeling of guilt to encourage family meals might be effective. Data obtained are being used to develop innovative, emotion-based messages that will be tested for effectiveness in promoting family meals.

Keywords

References

  1. Anderson PM & Butcher KF (2006). Childhood obesity: Trends and potential causes. Future Child 16:19-45
  2. Biener L, McCallum-Keeler G & Nyman AL (2000). Adults' response to Massachusetts anti-tobacco television advertisements: Impact of viewer and ad characteristics. Tobacco Control 9:401-407 https://doi.org/10.1136/tc.9.4.401
  3. Bystedt J, Lynn S & Potts D (2003). Moderating to the Max: A Full-tilt Guide to Creative Insightful Focus Groups and In-Depth Interviews, p.10-17. Paramount Market Publishing Inc., Ithaca. NY. USA
  4. Child Trends Databank (2003). Family meals. http://www.child trendsdatabank.org/pdf/96_PDF.pdf Accessed on 3/13/2008
  5. Crabtree BF & Miller WL (1999). Doing Qualitative Research, p.179-194. Sage Publications Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA. USA
  6. de Pee S, Bloem MW, Satoto, Yip R, Sukaton A, Tjiong R, Shrimpton R, Muhilal & Kodyat B (1998). Impact of a social marketing campaign promoting dark-green leafy vegetables and eggs in Central Java, Indonesia. Int J Vit Nutr Res 68:389-398
  7. Eisenberg ME, Olson RE, Neumark-Sztainer D, Story M & Bearinger LH (2004). Correlations between family meals and psychosocial well-being among adolescents. Arch Pediatr Adolesct Med 158:792-796 https://doi.org/10.1001/archpedi.158.8.792
  8. Farrelly MC, Healton CG, Davis KC, Messeri, P, Hersey JC & Haviland ML (2002). Getting to the truth: Evaluating national tobacco countermarketing campaigns. Am J Public Health 92:901-907 https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.92.6.901
  9. Gable S, Chang Y & Krull JL (2007). Television watching and frequency of family meals are predictive of overweight onset and persistence in a national sample of school-aged children. J Am Diet Assoc 107:53-61 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jada.2006.10.010
  10. Gillman MW, Rifas-Shiman SL, Frazier L, Rockett HRH, Camargo CA, Field AE, Berkey CS & Colditz GA (2000). Family dinner and diet quality among older children and adolescents. Arch Fam Med 9:235-240 https://doi.org/10.1001/archfami.9.3.235
  11. Iowa State University (2003). Share family meals. http://www.extension. iastate.edu/Publications/N3407A.pdf. Accessed on 3/22/2008
  12. Johnson B & Christensen L (2004). EducationalResearch: Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Approaches. Allyn and Bacon, Boston. MA
  13. King KA, Vidourek RA, Creighton S & Vogel S (2003). Smokers' willingness to protect children from secondhand smoke. Am Health Behav 2:554-563
  14. Krueger RA (1998). Analyzing & reporting focus group results. In: Morgan DL & Krueger RA. The Focus Group Kit, p.17-29. Sage Publications Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA. USA
  15. Larson DL (2006). Family mealtime - A tradition that isn't being skipped. http://www.csrees.usda.gov/newsroom/lgunews/family/news002. html. Accessed on 4/13/2008
  16. Lindenberger JH & Bryant CA (2000). Promoting breastfeeding in the WIC Program: A social marketing case study. Am J Health Behav 24:53-60 https://doi.org/10.5993/AJHB.24.1.8
  17. Mississippi State University Extension Service (2006). Family Nutrition Program. Starkville, MS. http://msucares.com/health/one/ fnp/ index.htm. Accessed on 3/22/2009
  18. Neumark-Sztainer D, Hannan PJ, Story M, Croll J & Perry C (2003). Family meal patterns: Association with sociodemographic characteristics and improved dietary intake among adolescents. J Am Diet Assoc 103:317-322 https://doi.org/10.1053/jada.2003.50048
  19. Peterson M, Abraham A & Waterfield A (2005). Marketing physical activity: Lessons learned from a statewide media campaign. Health Promot Pract 6:437-446 https://doi.org/10.1177/1524839904266797
  20. Prentice-Dunn S, Floyd DL & Flournoy JM (2001). Effects of persuasive message order on coping with breast cancer information. Health Educ Res 16:81-84 https://doi.org/10.1093/her/16.1.81
  21. The National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse at Columbia University (2006). The Importance of Family Dinners III, p1-2. http://www.casacolumbia.org/absolutenm/articlefiles /380Family% 20Dinners%20III%20Final %20report.pdf. Accessed on 3/13/2009
  22. Verrall T, Napash L, Leclerc L, Mercure S & Gray-Donald K (2006). Community-based communication strategies to promote infant iron nutrition in Northern Canada. Int J Circumpolar Health 65:65-78 https://doi.org/10.3402/ijch.v65i1.17892
  23. WIC Learning Center (2007). Family meals. http://www.nal.usda.gov/ wicworks/Learning_Center/WICfood_familymeals.html. Accessed on 3/22/2009
  24. Winkleby MA, Feldman HA & Murray DM (1997). Joint analysis of three U.S. community intervention trials for reduction of cardiovascular disease risk. J Clin Epidemiol 50:645-658 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-4356(97)00020-6
  25. Wolin SJ & Bennett LA (1984). Family rituals. Family Process 2:401-420
  26. Zaltman G (2003). How Customers Think; Essential Insights Into the Mind of the Market, p.47-50. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA. USA

Cited by

  1. Developing culturally congruent weight maintenance programs for African American church members vol.18, pp.2, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1080/13557858.2012.708914
  2. A Formative Evaluation of Shared Family Mealtime for Parents of Toddlers and Young Children vol.26, pp.7, 2009, https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2011.561920
  3. The Family Meal Model: Influences on Family Mealtime Participation vol.40, pp.2, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1177/1539449219876878