Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences

  • 제23권4호
  • /
  • Pages.483-490
  • /
  • 2010
  • /
  • 1011-2367(pISSN)
  • /
  • 1976-5517(eISSN)
아세아태평양축산학회 (Asian Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of Particle Size of Forage in the Dairy Ration on Feed Intake, Production Parameters and Quantification of Manure Index

  • Moharrery, A. (Animal Science Department, Agricultural College, Shahrekord University)
  • 투고 : 2009.07.20
  • 심사 : 2009.10.12
  • 발행 : 2010.04.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

The objectives of this study were to measure particle size and evaluate the effect of increasing alfalfa hay particle size on production characteristics in lactating Holstein dairy cows. Ninety multiparous Holstein cows in early to mid-lactation were randomly assigned in a complete randomized design for a 30-day period. Animals were offered one of the three diets, which were identical in energy, protein, and chemical composition, but differed only in particle size of alfalfa hay. The treatments were A) total mixed ration (TMR) in which only fine chopped alfalfa hay was incorporated in the ration, B) the same diet in which half of the alfalfa hay was fine chopped and incorporated in the mixed ration and half was long hay and offered as a top dressing, and C) the same diet with long hay alfalfa offered as a top dressing. Distribution of particle size of rations was determined through 20,000, 8,000 and 1,000 ${\mu}m$ sieves. The new method of quantitative determination of manure index was examined for each cow on different treatments. The geometric mean length of particle size in the rations was 5,666, 9,900 and 11,549 ${\mu}m$ for treatments A, B and C, respectively. Fat corrected milk (4%), milk fat percentage and production were significantly different (p<0.05) in treatment A versus B and C (fat corrected milk (FCM, 4%)) 28.3 vs. 35.2 and 32.3 kg/d, fat percentage 2.89, 4.04 and 3.62; but the change of ration particle size had no significant effect on milk production (p>0.05). Blood concentration of cholesterol in treatment A was significantly higher (p<0.05) than treatment B and C (181.0 vs. 150.0 and 155.2 mg/dl). Manure index in treatment C was significantly different (p<0.05) from treatment B (15.86 vs. 17.67). Based on these experimental findings, it is concluded that an increase in the ration particle size can increase milk fat percentage due to providing more physically effective fiber, which in turn could effect changes in manure consistency.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. ASAE. 2003. Method of determining and expressing fineness of feed materials by sieving. ANSI/ASAE S319.3 FEB03
  2. Beauchemin, K. A., B. I. Farr, L.M. Rode and G. B. Schaalje. 1994. Effects of alfalfa chop length and supplementary long hay on chewing and milk production of dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 77:1326-1339 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(94)77072-7
  3. Beauchemin, K. A. and L. M. Rode. 1997. Minimum versus optimum concentrations of fiber in dairy cows diets based on barley silage and concentrates of barley and corn. J. Dairy Sci. 80:1629-1639 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(97)76094-6
  4. Bhatti, S. A., J. G. P. Bowman, A. V. Grove and C. W. Hunt. 2008. Effect of intake level and alfalfa substitution for grass hay on ruminal kinetics of fiber digestion and particle passage in beef cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 86:134-145 https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2006-693
  5. Colenbrander, V. F., C. H. Noller and R. J. Grant. 1991. Effect of fiber content and particle size of alfalfa silage on performance and chewing behavior. J. Dairy Sci. 74:2681-2690 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78446-4
  6. Duffield, T. F., S. LeBlanc, R. Bagg, K. Leslie, J. Ten Hag and P. Dick. 2003. Effect of a monensin controlled release capsule on metabolic parameters in transition dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 86:1171-1176 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)73700-X
  7. Firkins, J. L., M. L. Eastridge, N. R. St-Pierre and S. M. Noftsger. 2001. Effects of grain variability and processing on starch utilization by lactating dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 79(E. Suppl.):E218- E238
  8. Fischer, J. M., J. G. Buchanan-Smith, C. Campbell, D. G. Grieve, and O. B. Allen. 1994. Effects of forage particle size and long hay for cows fed total mixed rations based on alfalfa and corn. J. Dairy Sci. 77:217-229 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(94)76944-7
  9. Grant, R. J., V. F. Colenbrander and D. R. Mertens. 1990. Milk fat depression in dairy cows: role of silage particle size. J. Dairy Sci. 73:1834-1842 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(90)78863-7
  10. Heinrichs, A. J., D. R. Buckmaster and B. P. Lammers. 1999. Processing, mixing, and particle size reduction of forages for dairy cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 77:180-186
  11. Huhtanen, P., J. Nousiainen and M. Rinne. 2006. Recent developments in forage evaluation with special reference to practical applications. Agric. Food Sci. 3:293-323
  12. Jaster, E. H. and M. R. Murphy. 1983. Effects of varying particle size of forage and digestion and chewing behavior of dairy heifers. J. Dairy Sci. 66:802-810 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(83)81860-8
  13. Kaneene, J. B., R. Miller, T. H. Herdt and J. C. Gardiner. 1997. The association of serum NEFA and cholesterol, management and feeding practices with periparturient disease in dairy cows. Prev. Vet. Med. 31:59-72 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-5877(96)01141-5
  14. Leonardi, C., K. J. Shinners and L. E. Armentano. 2005. Effect of different dietary geometric mean particle length and particle size distribution of oat silage on feeding behavior and productive performance of dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 88:698-710 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(05)72734-X
  15. Marsh, W. H., B. Fingerhut and E. Kirsch. 1957. Determination of urea N with the diacetyl method and an automatic dialyzing apparatus. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 28:681-688
  16. Mertens, D. R. 2002. Gravimetric determination of amylasetreated neutral detergent fiber in feeds with refluxing in beakers or crucibles: Collaborative study. J. AOAC Internat. 85:1217-1240
  17. Moharrery, A. 2004. Investigation of different levels of RDP in the rations of lactating cows and their effects on MUN, BUN, and urinary N excretion. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 3:157-165
  18. Murphy, M. R. and J. S. Zhu. 1997. A comparison of methods to analyze particle size as applied to alfalfa haylage, corn silage, and concentrate mix. J. Dairy Sci. 80:2932-2938 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(97)76259-3
  19. National Research Council. 2001. Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle. 7th rev. ed. Natl. Acad. Sci., Washington, DC
  20. Nocek, J. E. and R. A. Kohn. 1988. In sit0 particle size reduction of alfalfa and timothy hay as influenced by form and particle size. J. Dairy Sci. 71:932-945 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(88)79639-3
  21. Norgaard, P. 2006. Use of image analysis' measuring particle size in feed, digesta and faeces. In Ruminant Physiology (Ed. Sejrsen et al). p. 579
  22. Norgaard, P., E. Nadeau and M. Nordqvis. 2007. Distribution of particle size in manure from cattle - barn sieving technique. NJF's 23rd Congress, June 26-29, 2007, Copenhagen
  23. Rodrigue, C. B. and N. N. Allen. 1960. The effect of fine grinding of hay on ration digestibility, rate of passage, and milk fat content of milk. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 40:23-29 https://doi.org/10.4141/cjas60-004
  24. SAS User's Guide: Statistics, Version 9.1 Edition. 2003. SAS inst., Inc., Cary, NC
  25. Teimouri Yansari, A., R. Valizadeh, A. Naserian, D. A. Christensen, P. Yu and F. Eftekhari Shahroodi. 2004. Effects of alfalfa particle size and specific gravity on chewing activity, digestibility, and performance of Holstein dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 87:3912-3924 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(04)73530-4
  26. Troelsen, J. E. and J. B. Campbell. 1968. Voluntary consumption by sheep and its relation to the size and shape of particles in the digestive tract. Anim. Prod. 10:289-296 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003356100026295
  27. Van Soest, P. J., J. B. Robertson and B. A. Lewis. 1991. Symposium: Carbohydrate methodology, metabolism, and nutritional implications in dairy cattle. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber and non-starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J. Dairy Sci. 74:3583-3597 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2
  28. Woodford, S. T., and M. R. Murphy. 1988. Effect of physical form of forage on chewing activity, dry matter intake, and rumen function of dairy cows in early lactation. J. Dairy Sci. 71:674- 686 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(88)79606-X
  29. Worrell, M. A., D. C. Chton, W. W. Stronp and J. T. Nichols. 1986. Effect of harvest date on meadow hay quality. I. Nutritional attributes, voluntary intake and rate of passage in growing cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 63:1527-1537
  30. Zaaijer, D. and J. T. M. Noordhuizen. 2003. A novel scoring system for monitoring the relationship between nutritional efficiency and fertility in dairy cows. Irish Vet. J. 56:145-151