대한치과보철학회지 (The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics)

  • 제48권2호
  • /
  • Pages.122-127
  • /
  • 2010
  • /
  • 0301-2875(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2005-3789(eISSN)
대한치과보철학회 (The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Machined 티타늄 임플란트와 calcium phosphate coated 티타늄 임플란트의 조직형태계측학적 연구

Histomorphometric study of machined titanium implants and calcium phosphate coated titanium implants

  • 강현주 (서울대학교 치의학대학원) ;
  • 양재호 (서울대학교 치의학대학원 치과보철학교실)
  • Kang, Hyun-Joo (Department of Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Yang, Jae-Ho (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
  • 투고 : 2010.03.19
  • 심사 : 2010.04.14
  • 발행 : 2010.04.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

연구목적: 본 연구는 machined 임플란트와 골유도능이 있는 calcium phosphate를 electron-beam deposition으로 coating처리한 임플란트의 골/임플란트 접촉률을 조직형태계측학적으로 비교하는 것이다. 연구 재료 및 방법:여섯 마리의 수컷 New Zealand white rabbit과직경3.3 mm, 길이 5 mm의 임플란트 24개를 준비하였다. Machined 임플란트 (대조군)와 calcium phosphate coated 임플란트(실험군)를 좌, 우 경골에 2개씩 총 4개를 식립하고 임플란트 주위에 부하가 가해지지 않도록 하여 3주, 6주의 치유기간을 두었다. 식립 3주와 6주후, 각각 3마리의 토끼를 희생하여 조직시편을 제작하였다. 제작된 시편을 광학현미경 하에서 골/임플란트 접촉률 (BIC ratio)을 계산하고 paired t-test로 두 군을 비교하였다. 결과:골/임플란트 접촉률은 임플란트 식립 3주후, 대조군에서 평균과 표준편차는$44.1{\pm}16.5%$ 이었고 실험군은 $70.8{\pm}18.9%$로 실험군이 통계적으로 유의하게 높았다 (P= 0.0264). 6주후의경우, machined 임플란트는 $78.6{\pm}15.1%$, calcium phosphate coated 임플란트는 $79.0{\pm}26.0%$로 두 군 간 통계적으로 유의한 차이는 없었다. 결론: Calcium phosphate coated 임플란트는 machined 티타늄 임플란트에 비해 빠른 초기 골반응을 나타냈다. 그러므로, 임상적으로 calcium phosphate coated 임플란트를 사용했을 때, 수술 후 치유 기간을 단축하여 조기 부하가 가능할 것으로 사료된다.

Purpose: The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of calcium phosphate coated titanium implant surface on bone response and implant stability at early stage of healing period of 3 weeks and later healing period of 6 weeks. Material and methods: A total of 24 machined, screw-shaped implants (Dentium Co., Ltd., Seoul, Korea) which dimensions were 3.3 mm in diameter and 5.0 mm in length, were used in this research. All implants (n = 24), made of commercially pure (grade IV) titanium, were divided into 2 groups. Twelve implants (n = 12) were machined without any surface modification (control). The test implants (n = 12) were anodized and coated with thin film (150nm) of calcium phosphate by electron-beam deposition. The implants were placed on the proximal surface of the rabbit tibiae. The bone to implant contact (BIC) ratios was evaluated after 3 and 6 weeks of implant insertion. Results: The BIC percentage of calcium phosphate coated implants ($70.8{\pm}18.9%$) was significantly higher than that of machined implants ($44.1{\pm}16.5%$) 3 weeks after implant insertion (P = 0.0264). However, there was no significant difference between the groups after 6 weeks of healing (P > .05). Conclusion: The histomorphometric evaluation of implant surface revealed that; 1. After 3 weeks early healing period, bone to implant contact (BIC) percentage of calcium phosphate coated implants (70.8%) was much greater than that of surface untreated machined implants (44.1%) with P = 0.0264. 2. After 6 weeks healing period, however, BIC percentage of calcium phosphate coated implants group (79.0%) was similar to the machined only implant group (78.6%). There was no statistical difference between two groups (P = 0.8074). 3. We found the significant deference between the control group and experimental group during the early healing period of 3 weeks. But no statistical difference was found between two groups during the later of 6 weeks.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Eisenbarth E, Velten D, Schenk-Meuser K, Linez P, Biehl V, Duschner H, Breme J, Hildebrand H. Interactions between cells and titanium surfaces. Biomol Eng 2002;19:243-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1389-0344(02)00032-1
  2. $Br{\aa}anemark$ PI, Breine U, Adell R, Hansson BO, Lindstrom J, Ohlsson A. Intra-osseous anchorage of dental prostheses. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1969;3:81-100. https://doi.org/10.3109/02844316909036699
  3. Albrektsson T, $Br{\aa}anemark$ PI, Hansson HA, Lindstrom J. Osseointegrated titanium implants. Requirements for ensuring a long-lasting, direct bone-to-implant anchorage in man. Acta Orthop Scand 1981;52:155-70. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453678108991776
  4. Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T, Ulrich H, Krol JJ. An optical three-dimensional technique for topographical descriptions of surgical implants. J Biomed Eng 1992;14:412-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0141-5425(92)90087-2
  5. Albrektsson T, Sennerby L, Wennerberg A. State of the art of oral implants. Periodontol 2000 2008;47:15-26. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0757.2007.00247.x
  6. Wennerberg A, Albreksson T, Andersson B. Bone tissue response to commercially pure titanium implants blasted with fine and coarse particles of aluminum oxide. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11:38-45.
  7. Le Gu'ehennec L, Soueidan A, Layrolle P, Amouriq Y. Surface treatments of titanium dental implants for rapid osseointegration. Dent Mater 2007;23:844-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2006.06.025
  8. Vanzillotta PS, Sader MS, Bastos IN, Soares Gde A. Improvement of in vitro titanium bioactivity by three different surface treatments. Dent Mater 2006;22:275-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2005.03.012
  9. Daculsi G, Laboux O, Malard O, Weiss P. Current state of the art of biphasic calcium phosphate bioceramics. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2003;14:195-200. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022842404495
  10. Davies JE. Understanding peri-implant endosseous healing. J Dent Educ 2003;67:932-49.
  11. Lee EJ, Lee SH, Kim HW, Kong YM, Kim HE. Fluoridated apatite coatings on titanium obtained by electron-beam deposition. Biomaterials 2005;26:3843-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.10.019
  12. Donath K, Breuner G. A method for the study of undecalcified bones and teeth with attached soft tissues. The Sage-Schliff (sawing and grinding) technique. J Oral Pathol 1982;11:318-26. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0714.1982.tb00172.x
  13. Wagner WC. A Brief Introduction to advanced surface modification technologies. J Oral Implantol 1992;18:231-5.
  14. $Barr\`{e}re$ F, van der Valk CM, Meijer G, Dalmeijer RA, de Groot K, Layrolle P. Osteointegration of biomimetic apatite coating applied onto dense and porous metal implants in femurs of goats. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2003:67:655-65.
  15. Lee JJ, Rouhfar L, Beirne OR. Survival of hydroxyapatite-coated implants: a meta-analytic review. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2000;58:1372-9. https://doi.org/10.1053/joms.2000.18269
  16. Roberts WE, Smith RK, Zilberman Y, Mozsary PG, Smith RS. Osseous adaptation to continuous loading of rigid endosseous implants. Am J Orthod 1984;86:95-111. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(84)90301-4
  17. Al-Nawas B, Groetz KA, Goetz H, Duschner H, Wagner W. Comparative histomorphometry and resonance frequency analysis of implants with moderately rough surfaces in a loaded animal model. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008;19:1-8.
  18. Albrektsson T, Jacobsson M. Bone-metal interface in osseointegration. J Prosthet Dent 1987;57:597-607. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(87)90344-1