Medial Plantar Sensory Nerve Conduction Studies in Diabetics: Comparision of Three Different Methods

당뇨병 환자에서의 안쪽 발바닥 감각신경의 신경전도검사: 세 가지 다른 방법의 비교

  • Kwon, Hyuk-Hwan (Department of Neurology, The Catholic University of Daegu School of Medicine) ;
  • Lee, Dong-Kuck (Department of Neurology, The Catholic University of Daegu School of Medicine) ;
  • Seok, Jung-Im (Department of Neurology, The Catholic University of Daegu School of Medicine) ;
  • Han, Woo-Ho (Department of Neurology, The Catholic University of Daegu School of Medicine)
  • 권혁환 (대구가톨릭대학병원 신경과) ;
  • 이동국 (대구가톨릭대학병원 신경과) ;
  • 석정임 (대구가톨릭대학병원 신경과) ;
  • 한우호 (대구가톨릭대학병원 신경과)
  • Received : 2009.05.28
  • Accepted : 2009.06.07
  • Published : 2010.06.30

Abstract

Background: The medial plantar nerve (MPN) is a distal branch of the posterior tibial nerve, and various methods of nerve conduction study for MPN have been introduced so far. Hemmi et al described a new method (Hemmi's method) for recording medial plantar sensory nerve action potentials (SNAPs), which is considered as a simple and reliable method for measuring medial plantar SNAPs. This study was aimed to establish the normal values for the MPN conduction study among Koreans and to compare the sensitivities of three different methods for MPN conduction study (Hemmi, Oh, and Saeed's method) in detecting evidence of peripheral neuropathy among diabetic patients. Methods: In 27 healthy subjects, MPN conduction study using Hemmi's method was performed and normal values were calculated. In 54 diabetic patients who showed normal routine nerve conduction studies, three different methods for MPN conduction study were performed and diagnostic sensitivity of each method were compared. Results: In normal subjects, the mean medial plantar SNAP amplitude and conduction velocities measured by Hemmi's method were $4.3{\pm}1.0$ uV and $38.3{\pm}6.8$ m/s respectively. Among 54 patients with diabetes who showed normal routine nerve conduction studies, medial plantar SNAP was not obtainable in 28, 31, and 6 patients by Hemmi, Oh and Saeed's method respectively. Conclusions: In terms of the diagnostic sensitivity for detecting diabetic neuropathy, there had been no significant statistical difference between three different methods. Our study suggested that MPN conduction study using Hemmi's method is simple and useful screening test for early diabetic neuropathy, and is comparable with Oh's method.

Keywords

References

  1. Hemmi S, Inoue K, Murakami T, Sunada Y. Simple and novel method to measure distal sensory nerve conduction of the medial plantar nerve. Muscle Nerve 2007;36:307-312. https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.20814
  2. Park KS, Lee SH, Lee KW, Oh SJ. Interdigital nerve conduction study of the foot for early detection of diabetic sensory polyneuropathy. Clini Neurophysiol 2003;114:894-897. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1388-2457(03)00031-2
  3. Uluc K, Isak B, Borucu D, Temucin CM, Cetinkaya Y, Koytak PK et al. Medial plantar and dorsal sural nerve conduction sudies increase the sensitivity in the detection of neuropathy in diabetic patients. Clini Neurophysiol 2008;119:880-885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2008.01.001
  4. Guiloff RJ, Sherratt RM. Sensory conduction in medial plantar nerve: normal values, clinical applications, and a comparison with the sural and upper limb sensory nerve action potentials in peripheral neuropathy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1977; 40:1168-1181. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.40.12.1168
  5. Ponsford SN. Sensory conduction in medial and lateral plantar nerves. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1988;51:188-191. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.51.2.188
  6. Saeed MA, Gatens PF. Compound nerve action potentials of the medial and lateral plantar nerve through the tarsal tunnel. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1982;63:304-307
  7. Oh SJ, Lee KW. Medial plantar neuropathy. Neurology 1987; 37:1408-1410. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.37.8.1408
  8. Oh SJ. Clinical electromyography: nerve conduction studies. 3rd ed. Philladelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wikins. 2003;282-285.
  9. Oh SJ, Kwon KH, Hah JS, Kim DE, Demirci M. Lateral plantar neuropathy. Muscle Nerve 1999;22:1234-1238. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4598(199909)22:9<1234::AID-MUS10>3.0.CO;2-3
  10. Weiss L, Silver J, Weiss J. Easy EMG: a guide to performing nerve conduction studies and electromyography. New York: Butterworth Heinemann. 2004;13-16.
  11. Perkins BA, Bril V. Diabetic neuropathy: a review emphasizing diagnostic methods. Clini Neurophysiol 2003;114:1167-1175. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1388-2457(03)00025-7
  12. Loseth S, Nebuchennykh M, Stalberg E, Mellgren SI. Medial plantar nerve conduction studies in healthy controls and diabetics. Clini Neurophysiol 2007;118:1155–1161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2007.01.008
  13. Turgut N, Karasalihoglu S, Kucukugurluoglu Y, Balci K, Ekuklu G, Tutunculer F. Clinical utility of dorsal sural nerve conduction studies in healthy and diabetic children. Clini Neurophysiol 2004;115:1452-1456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2004.01.003
  14. Kocer A, Domac FM, Boylu E, Us O, Tanridag T. A comparison of sural nerve conduction studies in patients with impaired oral glucose tolerance test. Acta Neurol Scand 2007; 116:399-405. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0404.2007.00886.x
  15. Oh SJ, Kim HS, Ahmad BK. Electrophysiological diagnosis of interdigital neuropathy of the foot. Muscle Nerve 1984;7:218-225. https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.880070306
  16. Abraham RM, Abraham RR. Absence of the sensory action potential of the medial plantar nerve: a sensitive indicator of diabetic neuropathy. Diabet Med 1987;4:469-474. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-5491.1987.tb00911.x
  17. Rivner MH, Swift TR, Malik K. Influence of age and height on nerve conduction. Muscle Nerve 2001;24:1134-1141. https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.1124
  18. Bae JS, Na SK, Go SM, Kim SH, Kim BJ. Subclinical diabetic neuropathy with normal conventional nerve conduction study. J Korean Neuol Assoc 2006;24:557-563.
  19. Kwon SB, Kwon KH, Jung S, Oh MS, Hwang SH. Electrophysiological evidence of demyelination in patients with diabetic neuropathy. J Korean Neuol Assoc 2004;22:240-248.