Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment (환경영향평가)

Korean Society of Environmental Impact Assessment (한국환경영향평가학회)
권호 표지

Evaluation of Conservation and Use Values of Heritage Tourism Resources - Focused on Sustainable Use -

유산관광 자원에 대한 보존 및 이용가치 평가 - 지속가능한 이용을 중심으로 -

  • Yi, Young-Kyoung (Landscape Architecture at Dongguk University) ;
  • Yi, Pyong-In (Regional Environmental System Engineering at Pusan National University)
  • 이영경 (동국대학교 조경학과) ;
  • 이병인 (부산대학교 지역환경시스템학과)
  • Received : 2010.06.07
  • Accepted : 2010.07.28
  • Published : 2010.08.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Heritage resources have become important social assets as the global interests in heritage tourism increased. Utilization of heritage as unique tourist destination has positive effects on regional economy, which in turn plays an important role in heritage conservation. However, it was found that the essential quality of heritage resources has been degraded and even destroyed when excessive use was permitted. This undesirable side-effects of heritage tourism have led to the growing concern for sustainable tourism that can contribute to both utilization and conservation of heritage. In order for sustainable tourism to be effectively implemented, it is crucial for visitors to be aware of the need for heritage conservation because they are the most important consumers of the heritage. The purpose of this study was to suggest some basic information for sustainable tourism by investigating visitors' evaluation of conservation and use values of heritage resources. The study sites were the two Korean traditional temples(Sokrisan Bubjusa and Naejangsan Naejangsa) and contingent valuation method was used. 390 visitors in Bubjusa and 308 visitors in Naejangsa participated in the questionnaire survey. From the results, sustainable tourism is possible in such heritage areas as traditional temples because the participants had relatively balanced values for heritage conservation and use. The WTP for natural conservation value was found to be highest in both temples; visitors may be more agreeable with the heritage conservation plan if the sustainability of natural resource is emphasized. Also, the use value of heritage could be influenced by the tourism utilization of the area where the heritage was located. If there are no other famous tourist destinations except the heritage in the area, additional plans to develop alternative destinations should be prepared in order to formulate the agreement on the need to protect the heritage among visitors, local communities, and government.

Keywords

References

  1. 김학용, 김성섭, 2003, CVM을 이용한 水原 華城의 이용가치 평가, 관광학연구, 2(3), 157-172.
  2. 대한불교조계종, 2007, 국립공원 문화재와 문화재 관람표 바로알기, 대한불교조계종 문화재사찰위원회.
  3. 문경일, 임창호, 2003, 도시여가공간으로서 고궁의 이용가치 평가, 국토계획, 38(2), 191-201.
  4. 변일용, 김선범, 2007, 울산의 역사문화자원 이용특성 및 가치평가 연구. 한국도시지리학회지 10(3), 69-78.
  5. 유정우, 2008, 지속가능한 관광개발의 파트너쉽 및 네트워크와 관광거버넌스 간의 구조관계 연구. 관광학 연구, 32(3), 37-60.
  6. 이영경, 2008, 문화유산의 경제적 가치평가-불국사,석굴암을 중심으로, 한국전통조경학회지 26(1), 35-43.
  7. 이영경, 2009, 문화유산의 문화적 가치와 경제적가치-일단계 이선선택형 가상가치평가법의 적용-. 한국전통조경학회지, 27(4), 51-60.
  8. 정민섭, 한혜숙, 박선희, 2008, CVM을 이용한 근대문화유산의 가치평가에 관한 연구, 호텔경영학 연구, 17(3), 175-195.
  9. 최규환, 여호근, 2007, 양분선택형 실험적 가상가치평가법(CVM-X)을 적용한 가야고분유적의 경제적 가치평가, 관광,레저연구, 19(1), 77-92.
  10. 한상열, 2003, 산림휴양가치 평가를 위한 이단계 이선선택형 Turnbull 분포무관모형의 적용, 한국 산림휴양학회지, 7(1), 1-6.
  11. 한상열, 2007, Turnbull 분포무관무형을 이용한 월악산 국립공원의 자산가치 평가, 한국임학회지, 96(3), 283-289.
  12. 한상현, 2007) 二重兩分選擇形 조건부 가치추정법을 이용한 문화유산 관광자원의 가치평가, 관광학연구, 31(1), 443-464.
  13. Apostolakis, A. and jaffry, S., 2005, A choice modeling application for Greek heritage attractions, Journal of Travel Research, 43(3), 309-318. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287504272035
  14. Ashworth, G. J., 1994, From history to heritage: from heritage to identity: in search of concepts and modeIs, In Ashworth, G.J. and larkham, P. J.(ed)., Building a New Heritage, Routldege, 13-30.
  15. Bille Hansen T., 1997, The willingness-to-pay for the royal theatre in copenhagen as a public good, Journal of Cultural Economics, 21, 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007303016798
  16. Drost, A., 1996, Developing sustainable tourism for world heritage sites, Annals of Tourism Research, 23(2), 479-492. https://doi.org/10.1016/0160-7383(96)83345-7
  17. Garrod, B. and Fyall , A., 2000, Managing heritage tourism, Annals of Tourism Research, 27(3), 682-708. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-7383(99)00094-8
  18. Haab, T. C. and K. E. McConnell, 1997, Referendum models and negative willingness to pay: altemative solutions, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 32, 251-270. https://doi.org/10.1006/jeem.1996.0968
  19. Inskeep, E., 1991, Tourism Planning: Principles, Practices, Philosophies, John Willeys & Sons Inc, pp. 375.
  20. Nasser, N., 2003, Planning for urban heritage places: reconciling conservation, tourism, and sustainable development, Journal of Planning Literature, 17, 467-479. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885412203017004001
  21. Navrud, S., R. Ready, 2002, Valueing cultural heritage: applying environmental valuation techniques to historic building, monuments and artifacts, Edward Elgar Publishing.
  22. Noonan, D. S., 2003, Contingent valuation and cultural resources: a meta-analytic review of the literature, Journal of Cultural Economics, 27, 159-176. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026371110799
  23. Orbasli, A., 2000, Tourists in historic towns: urban conservation and heritage management, E & FN Spon.
  24. Otto, J. E. and Ritchie, J. R. B., 2000, The service experience in tourism, Tourism Management, 17(3), 165-174.
  25. Pollicino, M. and D. Maddison, 2001, Valuing the benefits of cleaning lincoln cathedral, Journal of Cultural Economics, 25, 131-148. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007653432745
  26. Powe, N. A. and K. G. Willis, 1996, Benefits received by visitors to heritage sites: a case study of warkworth castle, Leisure Studies, 15, 259-275. https://doi.org/10.1080/026143696375558
  27. Provins, A., D. Pearce., E. Ozdemiroglu., S. Mourato. and S. Morse-Jones, 2008, Valuation of the historic environment: the scope for using economic valuation evidence in the appraisal of heritagerelated projects, Progress in Planning, 69, 131-175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progress.2008.01.001
  28. Salazar, S. D. S. and J. M. Marques, 2005, Valuing cultural heritage: the social benefits of restoring and old Arab tower, Journal of Cultural Heritage, 6, 69-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2004.09.001
  29. Santagata, W. and G. Signorello, 2000, Contingent valuation of a cultural public good and policy design: the case of "Napoli Musei aperti", Journal of Cultural Economics, 24, 181-204. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007642231963
  30. Sanz, J. A, L. C. Herrero., and A. M. Bedate, 2003, Contingent valuation and semiparametric methods: a case study of the national museum of sculpture in valladolid, spain, Journal of Cultural Economics, 27, 241-257. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026353218280
  31. Stettner, A. C., 1993, Community or commodity?: sustainable development in mountain resorts, Tourism Recreation Research, 18(1), 8-17.
  32. Throsby, D., 2003, Determining the value of culturai goods: how much (or how little) does contingent valuation tell us?, Journal of Cultural Economics, 27, 275-285. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026353905772
  33. Tiesdell , S, Oc, T., and Heath, T., 1996, Revitalizing historic urban quarters, Butterworth-Heinemann.
  34. Tosen, C., 2001, Challenges of sustainable tourism development in the developing world: the case of Turkey, Tourism Management, 22, 289-303. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-5177(00)00060-1
  35. Tuan, T. H. and S. Navrud., 2008, Capturing the benefits of preserving cultural heritage, Journal of Cultural Heritage, 9, 326-337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2008.05.001
  36. Tuan, T. H., U. Seenprachawong., and S. Navrud., 2009, Comparing cultural heritage values in south east asiapossibilities and difficulties in crosscountry transfers of economic values, Journal of Cultural Economics, 10, 9-21.
  37. Wight, P., 1995, Sustainable ecotourism: balancing economic environmental and social goals within and ethical framework, Tourism Recreation Research, 2((1), 7-22.