DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Camparative study of NHPP Extreme Value Distribution Software Reliability Model from the Perspective of Learning Effects

NHPP 극값 분포 소프트웨어 신뢰모형에 대한 학습효과 기법 비교 연구

  • 김희철 (남서울대학교 산업경영공학과)
  • Received : 2011.04.02
  • Accepted : 2011.05.24
  • Published : 2011.06.30

Abstract

In this study, software products developed in the course of testing, software managers in the process of testing software test and test tools for effective learning effects perspective has been studied using the NHPP software. The finite failure non-homogeneous Poisson process models presented and the life distribution applied extreme distribution which used to find the minimum (or the maximum) of a number of samples of various distributions. Software error detection techniques known in advance, but influencing factors for considering the errors found automatically and learning factors, by prior experience, to find precisely the error factor setting up the testing manager are presented comparing the problem. As a result, the learning factor is greater than automatic error that is generally efficient model could be confirmed. This paper, a numerical example of applying using time between failures and parameter estimation using maximum likelihood estimation method, after the efficiency of the data through trend analysis model selection were efficient using the mean square error.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : 남서울대학교

References

  1. Gokhale, S. S. and Trivedi, K. S. "A time/structure based software reliability model," Annals of Software Engineering. 8, 1999, pp. 85-121. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018923329647
  2. Goel AL, Okumoto K, "Time-dependent fault detection rate model for software and other performance measures," IEEE Trans Reliab. 28, 1978, pp. 206-11.
  3. Yamada S, Ohba H. "S-shaped software reliability modeling for software error detection," IEEE Trans Reliab. 32, 1983, pp. 475-484.
  4. Zhao M. "Change-point problems in software and hardware reliability," Commun. Stat Theory Methods, 22(3), 1993, pp. 757-768. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610929308831053
  5. Shyur H-J. "A stochastic software reliability model with imperfect debugging and change-point," Syst. Software 66, 2003, pp. 135-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0164-1212(02)00071-7
  6. Pham H, Zhang X. "NHPP software reliability and cost models with testing coverage," Eur J Oper Res, 145, 2003, pp. 445-454.
  7. Huang C-Y. "Performance analysis of software reliability growth models with testing-effort and change-point," J Syst Software 76, 2005, pp. 181-194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2004.04.024
  8. Kuei-Chen, C, Yeu-Shiang, H., and Tzai-Zang, L. "A study of software reliability growth from the perspective of learning effects," Reliability Engineering and System Safety 93, 2008, pp. 1410-1421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2007.11.004
  9. J. F. lawless. Statistical Models and Methods for Lifetime Data. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1981.
  10. L. Kuo and T. Y. Yang. "Bayesian Computation of Software Reliability," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 91, 1996, pp. 763-773. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1996.10476944
  11. 김희철, "극값 분포 특성을 가진 소프트웨어 신뢰성 보증모형에 관한 연구", 한국 통신학회 논문지, 34권6호, 2009, pp. 623-629.
  12. K. Kanoun and J. C. Laprie, "Handbook of Software Reliability Engineering," M. R. Lyu, Editor, chapter Trend Analysis, McGraw-Hill New York, NY: 1996, pp. 401-437.