임상간호연구 (Journal of Korean Clinical Nursing Research)

  • 제17권2호
  • /
  • Pages.239-250
  • /
  • 2011
  • /
  • 1598-9186(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-3694(eISSN)
병원간호사회 (Hospital Nurses Association)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

조산 및 저출생체중아를 분만한 산부의 Labor Support Behaviors의 일대일 적용 및 배우자의 분만참여에 따른 분만만족도와 분만결과 비교

The Effects of Labor Support Behaviors (LSB) One-to-one Application and Partner's Delivery Participation on the Delivery Satisfaction and Delivery Results among Mothers Who Delivered Premature Birth and Low Birth Weight Infant

  • Park, Kwang Hee (Delivery Floor Nursing Unit, Seoul Nationl University Bundang Hospital) ;
  • Lee, Se Hwa (Delivery Floor Nursing Unit, Seoul Nationl University Bundang Hospital) ;
  • Jin, Bo Kyung (Delivery Floor Nursing Unit, Seoul Nationl University Bundang Hospital) ;
  • Won, Jin Suk (Delivery Floor Nursing Unit, Seoul Nationl University Bundang Hospital)
  • 투고 : 2011.05.25
  • 심사 : 2011.07.01
  • 발행 : 2011.08.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Purpose: This study was aimed to evaluate the effects of Labor Support Behaviors (LSB) one-to-one application and partner's delivery participation on the delivery satisfaction and delivery results among mothers who delivered premature birth and low birth weight infant. Methods: The data were collected from 30 mothers in the experimental group and 27 in the control group from April 23, 2009 to April 22, 2010. The collected data were analyzed using percentage, mean, standard deviation, $x^2-test$ (Fisher's exact test) and t-test with SPSS. Results: The satisfaction levels of the experimental group and the control group women were $3.73{\pm}0.43$ and $3.72{\pm}0.34$ as mean values, respectively, showing not statistically different (t=0.07, p=.945). None showed less than 7 point of Apgar score at 1 minute in the experimental group while 5 out of 27 did (18.5%) in the control group, which was statistically meaningful. Also, the emergent cesarian section cases were 3 out of 33 (9.1%) in the experimental group and 5 out of 32 (15.6%) in the control group, demonstrating lower emergency cesarian section rate in the experimental group than the control group, but showing not statistically different ($x^2=0.643$, p=.475). Conclusion: The results of this study show that LSB one-to-one application and partner's participation has affirmative effects on 1 minute Apgar scores of newborns.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 구윤희, 김선권, 심재윤, 원혜성, 이필량, 김암(2006). 출생신고에 근거한 전국 조산율의 분석 -1995년부터 2003년까지-. 대한산부인과학회지, 49 (9), 1855-1865.
  2. 김종화(2005). 조산의 최신 처치 지견. 대한산부인과학회지, 48 (7), 1605-1612.
  3. 김희숙(2003). 출산여성의 일반 분만과 선택 분만에 따른 출산경험의 지각. 이화여자대학교 석사학위논문, 서울.
  4. 박정한, 이상원(2005. 4). 출산율 감소에 따른 신생아 건강 문제: 저출생체중아 출생률 증가 - 산모연령별 저출생체중아 출생률 -. 한국모자보건학회 제17회 춘계학술대회 자료집, 32-36.
  5. 신기수(1996). 산모가 인지한 분만지지자별 분만경험 분석. 여성건강간호학회지, 2 (1), 5-20.
  6. 여정희(2000). 초산부의 간호요구에 관한 연구. 여성건강간호학회지, 6 (1), 46-53.
  7. 오정혜, 이혜자, 김유경, 민자, 박광옥(2006). 출산준비교육과 가족 분만이 초산모의 불안, 분만진통 및 분만경험지각에 미치는 효과. 임상간호연구, 12 (2), 145-156.
  8. 오현이, 심정신, 김진선(2002). 초산모의 산전교육이 분만경험 지각, 어머니 역할 수행에 대한 자신감, 만족도에 미치는 효과. 여성건강간호학회지, 8 (2), 268-277.
  9. 이미경(2002). 미숙아 및 저체중 출생아의 치료과정의 특성에 관한 분석연구. 경희대학교 석사학위논문, 서울.
  10. 이미경(2005). 산부의 분만 자신감 결정요인에 관한 연구. 여성건강 간호학회지, 11 (1), 20-26.
  11. 이순희(1989). 병원분만 신생아의 체중 및 Apgar치와 임산부의 제 특성과의 관련성연구. 한국보건 간호학회지, 3 (1), 38-60.
  12. 이은희, 김증임, 김윤미, 김연미(2005). UNICEF추천병원에서 분만한 산부의 분만통증, 분만자신감, 분만편안함에 관한 연구. 여성건강간호학회지, 11 (2), 129-134.
  13. 허명행(1998). 분만 스트레스와 분만 스트레스 감소를 위한 Doula 식 분만간호의 적용. 김천과학대 과학대학 논문집, 24 , 67-82.
  14. 허명행(2001). 일대일 분만지지간호가 초산모의 분만동통, 분만 스트레스 반응, 분만경험 및 신생아 상태에 미치는 효과. 여성건강간호학회지, 7 (2), 188-202.
  15. Adams, E. D., & Bianchi, A. L. (2008). A practical approach to labor support. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing, 37 (1), 106-115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1552-6909.2007.00213.x
  16. Bickley, L. S., Hoekelman, R. A., & Bates, B. (2000). 건강사정 (이강이, 박정숙, 이영휘, 전시자, 홍미순 외 편역.). 서울: 현문사(원저 1999 출판).
  17. Gennaro, S., & Krouse, A. (1996). Patterns of postpartum health in mothers of low birth weight infants. Health Care for Women International, 17 (1), 35-45. https://doi.org/10.1080/07399339609516218
  18. Helwig, J. T., Parer, J. T., Kilpatrick, S. J., & Laros, R. K. Jr. (1996). Umbilical cord blood acid-base state: What is normal? American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 174 (6), 1807-1812. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9378(96)70214-4
  19. Hodnett, E. D. (2000). Selected cochrane systematic reviews. Caregiver support for women during childbirth. Birth, 27 (3), 217. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-536x.2000.00217.x
  20. McGrath, S. K., & Kennell, J. H. (2008). A randomized controlled trial of continuous labor support for middle-class couples: Effect on cesarean delivery rates. Birth, 35 (2), 92-97. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-536X.2008.00221.x
  21. Morrison, J. C. (1990). Preterm birth: A puzzle worth solving. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 76 (Suppl 1), 5S-12S.
  22. Page, F. O., Martin, J. N., Palmer, S. M., Martin, R. W., Lucas, J. A., Meeks, G. R., et al. (1986). Correlation of neonatal acid-base status with Apgar scores and fetal heart rate tracings. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 154 (6), 1306-1311. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(86)90717-9
  23. Payant, L., Davies, B., Graham, I. D., Peterson, W. E., & Clinch, J. (2008). Nurses' intentions to provide continuous labor support to women. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing, 37 (4), 405-414. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1552-6909.2008.00257.x
  24. Pfoutz, S. K. (1990). Development of an instrument to measure satisfaction with patient care in the postpartum period. Unpublished doctorial dissertation, University of Michigan Williams Obstetrics, McGraw Hill, 1241.
  25. Romano, A. M., & Lothian, J. A. (2008). Promoting, protecting, and supporting normal birth: A look at the evidence. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing, 37 (1), 94-104. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1552-6909.2007.00210.x
  26. Smith, L. F. (2001). Development of a multidimensional labour satisfaction questionnaire: Dimensions, validity, and internal reliability. Quality in Health Care, 10 (1), 17-22. https://doi.org/10.1136/qhc.10.1.17
  27. World Health Organization. (1977). WHO: Recommended definitions, terminology and format for statistical tables related to the perinatal period and use of a new certificate for cause of perinatal deaths. Modifications recommended by FIGO as amended October 14, 1976. ACTA Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 56 (3), 247- 253.
  28. Yang, Q., Wen, S. W., Chen, Y., Krewski, D., Fung Kee Fung, K., & Walker, M. (2006). Neonatal mortality and morbidity in vertex-vertex second twins according to mode of delivery and birth weight. Journal of Perinatology, 26 (1), 3-10. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jp.7211408