DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Preparation of Activated Carbon Fibers from Cost Effective Commercial Textile Grade Acrylic Fibers

  • Received : 2011.01.18
  • Accepted : 2011.03.07
  • Published : 2011.03.30

Abstract

Activated carbon fibers (ACFs) were prepared from cost effective commercial textiles through stabilization, carbonization, and subsequently activation by carbon dioxide. ACFs were characterized for surface area and pore size distribution by physical adsorption of nitrogen at 77 K. ACFs were also examined for various surface characteristics by scanning electron microscopy, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, and CHNO elemental analyzer. The prepared ACFs exhibited good surface textural properties with well developed micro porous structure. With improvement in physical strength, the commercial textile grade acrylic precursor based ACFs developed in this study may have great utility as cost effective adsorbents in environmental remediation applications.

Keywords

References

  1. Ryu SK, Kim SY, Gallego N, Edie DD. Carbon, 37, 1619 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-6223(99)00086-X
  2. Carrott PJM, Nabais JMV, Ribeiro Carrott MML, Pajares JA. Carbon, 39, 1543 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-6223(00)00271-2
  3. Ryu Z, Zheng J, Wang M. Carbon, 36, 427 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-6223(97)00225-X
  4. Gurudatt K, Lal D, Tripathi VS. Indian J Fiber Textil Res, 23, 153 (1998).
  5. Oya A, Yoshida S, Alcaniz-Monge J, Linares-Solano A. Carbon, 34, 53 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-6223(95)00134-4
  6. Li CY, Wan YZ, Wang J, Wang YL, Jiang XQ, Han LM. Carbon, 36, 61 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-6223(97)00151-6
  7. Bohra JN, Saxena RK. Colloid Surface, 58, 375 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-6622(91)80216-B
  8. Oya A, Yoshida S, Alcaniz-Monge J, Linares-Solano A. Carbon, 33, 1085 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-6223(95)00054-H
  9. You SY, Park YH, Park CR. Carbon, 38, 1453 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-6223(99)00278-X
  10. Carrott PJM, Nabais JMV, Ribeiro Carrott MML, Pajares JA. Fuel Process Technol, 77-78, 381 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-3820(02)00085-1
  11. Marsh H, Rand B. Carbon, 9, 47 (1971). https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-6223(71)90143-6
  12. Nakagawa H, Watanabe K, Harada Y, Miura K. Carbon, 37, 1455 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-6223(99)00008-1
  13. Carrott PJM, Freeman JJ. Carbon, 29, 499 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-6223(91)90113-W
  14. Zdravkov BD, Cermak JJ, Sefara M, Janku J. Cent Eur J Chem, 5, 385 (2007). https://doi.org/10.2478/s11532-007-0017-9
  15. Gregg SJ, Sing KSW. Adsorption, Surface Area, and Porosity. 2nd ed., Academic Press, New York (1982).

Cited by

  1. Effects of improved porosity and electrical conductivity on pitch-based carbon nanofibers for high-performance gas sensors vol.19, pp.6, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10934-011-9559-5
  2. Cytotoxic Evaluation of the Hierarchical Web of Carbon Micronanofibers vol.52, pp.12, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1021/ie303273s
  3. Superhydrophobic carbon-based materials: a review of synthesis, structure, and applications vol.15, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.5714/CL.2014.15.2.089
  4. Capture vol.32, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.5572/KOSAE.2016.32.2.176
  5. Thermal behavior and thermal stabilization of guanidine hydrochloride-modified acrylic fiber for preparation of low-cost carbon fiber pp.1588-2926, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-018-7848-9
  6. and air vol.5, pp.12, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.180775