DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparisons of In vitro Nitrate Reduction, Methanogenesis, and Fermentation Acid Profile among Rumen Bacterial, Protozoal and Fungal Fractions

  • Lin, M. (College of Animal Science and Technology, State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, China Agricultural University) ;
  • Schaefer, D.M. (Department of Animal Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison) ;
  • Guo, W.S. (College of Animal Science and Technology, State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, China Agricultural University) ;
  • Ren, L.P. (College of Animal Science and Technology, State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, China Agricultural University) ;
  • Meng, Q.X. (College of Animal Science and Technology, State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, China Agricultural University)
  • Received : 2010.08.11
  • Accepted : 2010.10.10
  • Published : 2011.04.01

Abstract

The objectives were to compare the ability of various rumen microbial fractions to reduce nitrate and to assess the effect of nitrate on in vitro fermentation characteristics. Physical and chemical methods were used to differentiate the rumen microbial population into the following fractions: whole rumen fluid (WRF), protozoa (Pr), bacteria (Ba), and fungi (Fu). The three nitrogen substrate treatments were as follows: no supplemental nitrogen source, nitrate or urea, with the latter two being isonitrogenous additions. The results showed that during 24 h incubation, WRF, Pr and Ba fractions had an ability to reduce nitrate, and the rate of nitrate disappearance for the Pr fraction was similar to the WRF fraction, while the Ba fraction needed an adaptation period of 12 h before rapid nitrate disappearance. The WRF fraction had the greatest methane ($CH_4$) production and the Pr fraction had the greatest prevailing $H_2$ concentration (p<0.05). Compared to the urea treatment, nitrate diminished net gas and $CH_4$ production during incubation (p<0.05), and ammonia-N ($NH_3$-N) concentration (p<0.01). Nitrate also increased acetate, decreased propionate and decreased butyrate molar proportions (p<0.05). The Pr fraction had the highest acetate to propionate ratio (p<0.05). The Pr fraction as well as the Ba fraction appears to have an important role in nitrate reduction. Nitrate did not consistently alter total VFA concentration, but it did shift the VFA profile to higher acetate, lower propionate and lower butyrate molar proportions, consistent with less $CH_4$ production by all microbial fractions.

Keywords

References

  1. Allison, M. J. and C. A. Reddy. 1984. Adaptations of gastrointestinal bacteria in response to changes in dietary oxalate and nitrate. In: Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on Microbial Ecology (Ed. M. J. Klug and C. A. Reddy). Am. Soc. Microbiol. Washington, DC., USA. pp. 248-256.
  2. Anderson, R. C. and M. A. Rasmussen. 1998. Use of a novel nitrotoxin metabolizing bacterium to reduce ruminal methane production. Bioresour. Technol. 64:89-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(97)00184-3
  3. Bauchop, T. 1979. Rmnen anaerobic fungi of cattle and sheep. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 318:148-158.
  4. Coleman, G. S. 1975. The interrelationship between ciliate protozoa and bacteria. In: Digestion and Metabolism in the Ruminant (Ed. W. McDonald and A. C. I. Warner), University of New England Publishing Unit, Armidale, Australia. pp. 149-164.
  5. Conrad, R. and B. Wetter. 1990. Influence of temperature on energetics of hydrogen metabolism in homoacetogenic, methanogenic, and other anaerobic bacteria. Arch. Microbiol. 155:94-98. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00291281
  6. Farra, P. A. and L. D. Satter. 1971. Manipulation of the ruminal fermentation. III. Effect of nitrate on ruminal volatile fatty acid production and milk composition. J. Dairy Sci. 54:1018-1024. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(71)85965-9
  7. Farra, P. A. 1969. Nitrate as an alternate electron acceptor in ruminal fermentation and its effect on volatile fatty acid production. M.S. Thesis, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin.
  8. Finlay, B. J., G. Esteban, K. J. Clarke, A. G. Williams, T. M. Embley and R. P. Hirt. 1994. Some rumen ciliates have endosymbiotic methanogens. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 117:157-162. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6968.1994.tb06758.x
  9. Geurink, J. H., A. Malestein, A. Kemp and A. Klooster. 1979. Nitrate poisoning in cattle. 3. The relationship between nitrate intake with hay or fresh roughage and the speed of intake on the formation of methaemoglobin. Neth. J. Agric. Sci. 27:268-276.
  10. Guo, W. S., D. M. Schaefer, X. X. Guo, L. P. Ren and Q. X. Meng. 2009. Use of nitrate-nitrogen as a sole dietary nitrogen source to inhibit ruminal methanogenesis and to improve microbial nitrogen synthesis in vitro. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 22:542-549. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2009.80361
  11. Hungate, R. E. 1966. The rumen and its microbes. Academic Press, New York, USA.
  12. Iwamoto, M., N. Asanuma and T. Hino. 1999. Effect of nitrate combined with fumarate on methanogenesis, fermentation, and cellulose digestion by mixed ruminal microbes in vitro. Anim. Sci. J. 70:471-478.
  13. Jones, G. A. 1972. Dissimilatory metabolism of nitrate by the rumen microbiota. Can. J. Microbiol. 18:1783-1787. https://doi.org/10.1139/m72-279
  14. Johnson, J. L., N. R. Schneiderm, C. L. Kelling and A. R. Doster. 1983. Nitrate exposure in perinatal beef calves. Am. Assn. Vet. Lab Diagnosticians. 30th Proc. pp. 167-180.
  15. Johnson, K. A. and D. E. Johnson. 1995. Methane emissions from cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 73:2483-2492.
  16. Lee, S. S., J. K. Ha and K. J. Cheng. 2000. Relative contributions of bacteria, protozoa, and fungi to in vitro degradation of orchard grass cell walls and their interactions. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66:3807-3813. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.66.9.3807-3813.2000
  17. Marinho, A. A. M. 1986. Nitrate toxicity in ruminants metabolism of nitrate and nitrite in the rumen. Rev. Port. Cienc. Vet. 81:67-81.
  18. Menke, K. H., L. Raab, A. Salewski, H. Steingass, D. Fritz and W. Schneider. 1979. The estimation of the digestibility and metabolizable energy content of ruminant feedingstuffs from the gas production when they are incubated with rumen liquor in vitro. J. Agric. Sci. (Camb.) 93:217-222. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859600086305
  19. Miyazaki, A. 1977. Effects of dietary nitrate on the performance of ruminants. Jpn. J. Zootech. Sci. 48:53-61.
  20. Pfister, J. A. 1988. Nitrate intoxication of ruminant livestock. In: The Ecology and Economic Impact of Poisonous Plants on Livestock Production (Ed. L. F. James, M. H. Ralphs and D. B. Nielsen). Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado, USA. pp. 233-259.
  21. Rodhe, H. 1990. A comparison of the contribution of various gases to the greenhouse effect. Science 248:1217-1219. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.248.4960.1217
  22. Russell, J. B. and R. J. Wallace. 1988. Energy yielding and consuming reactions. In: The rumen microbial ecosystem (Ed. P. N. Hobson). Elsevier science publisher, New York, USA. pp. 185-215.
  23. Sar, C., B. Mwenya, B. Santoso, K. Takaura, R. Morikawa, N. Isogai, Y. Asakura, Y. Toride and J. Takahashi. 2005a. Effect of Escherichia coli W3110 on ruminal methanogenesis and nitrate/nitrite reduction in vitro. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 118:295-306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2004.10.004
  24. Sar C., B. Mwenya, B. Santoso, K. Takaura, R. Morikawa, N. Isogai, Y. Asakura, Y. Toride and J. Takahashi. 2005b. Effect of Escherichia coli wild type or its derivative with high nitrite reductase activity on in vitro ruminal methanogenesis and nitrate/nitrite reduction. J. Anim. Sci. 83:644-652.
  25. Sar, C., B. Mwenya, B. Pen, K. Takaura, R. Morikawa, A. Tsujimoto, N. Isogai, Y. Asakura, I. Shinzato, Y. Toride and J. Takahashi. 2006. Effect of wild type Escherichia coli W3110 or Escherichia coli nir-Ptac on methane emission and nitrate toxicity in nitrate-treated sheep. International Congress Series, 1293:193-196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ics.2006.03.015
  26. SAS. 2008. SAS $OnlineDoc^{\circledR}$ 9.1.3. SAS Inst. Inc., Cary, N.C. USA.
  27. Stewart, C. S. and M. P. Bryant. 1988. The rumen bacteria. In: The Rumen Microbial Ecosystem (Ed. P. N. Hobson and C. S. Stewart). Blackie Academic & Professional, London, UK. pp. 21-75.
  28. Takahashi, J. and B. A. Young. 1991. Prophylactic effect of L-cysteine on nitrate-induced alteration in respiratory exchange and metabolic rate in sheep. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 35:105-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(91)90103-Y
  29. Van Nevel, C. J. and D. I. Demeyer. 1996. Control of rumen methanogenesis. Environ. Monit. Assess. 42:73-97. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00394043
  30. Veira, D. W. 1986. The role ciliate protozoa in nutrition of the ruminant. J. Anim. Sci. 63:1547-1567.
  31. Woods, D. D. 1938. The reduction of nitrate to ammonia by Clostridum welchii. Biochem. J. 32:2000-2012.
  32. Yoshida, J., Y. Nakamura and R. Nakamura. 1982. Effect of protozoa fraction and lactate on nitrate metabolism of microorganisms in sheep rumen. Japan J. Zootech. Sci. 53:677-685.
  33. Zhang, Y. Q., W. Gao and Q. X. Meng. 2007. Fermentation of plant cell walls by ruminal bacteria, protozoa and fungi and their interaction with fiber particle size. Arch Anim. Nutr. 61:114-125. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450390701204020

Cited by

  1. Changes in rumen bacterial community composition in steers in response to dietary nitrate vol.97, pp.19, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-013-5143-z
  2. A review of feeding supplementary nitrate to ruminant animals: nitrate toxicity, methane emissions, and production performance vol.94, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.4141/cjas-2014-069
  3. Effects of Nitrate Addition on Rumen Fermentation, Bacterial Biodiversity and Abundance vol.28, pp.10, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.15.0091
  4. Effects of Rumen Protozoa of Brahman Heifers and Nitrate on Fermentation and In vitro Methane Production vol.29, pp.6, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.15.0641
  5. Limits to Dihydrogen Incorporation into Electron Sinks Alternative to Methanogenesis in Ruminal Fermentation vol.6, pp.1664-302X, 2015, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.01272
  6. Use of dietary nitrate to increase productivity and reduce methane production of defaunated and faunated lambs consuming protein-deficient chaff vol.56, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1071/AN15525
  7. Can adaptation to nitrate supplementation and provision of fermentable energy reduce nitrite accumulation in rumen contents in vitro? vol.56, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1071/AN15609
  8. Managing the rumen to limit the incidence and severity of nitrite poisoning in nitrate-supplemented ruminants vol.56, pp.8, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1071/AN15324
  9. Insights on Alterations to the Rumen Ecosystem by Nitrate and Nitrocompounds vol.7, pp.1664-302X, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.00228
  10. Nitrate and Inhibition of Ruminal Methanogenesis: Microbial Ecology, Obstacles, and Opportunities for Lowering Methane Emissions from Ruminant Livestock vol.7, pp.1664-302X, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.00132
  11. Biofilm compartmentalisation of the rumen microbiome: modification of fermentation and degradation of dietary toxins vol.57, pp.11, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1071/AN17382
  12. Effects of encapsulated nitrate on enteric methane production and nitrogen and energy utilization in beef heifers1,2 vol.93, pp.5, 2015, https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2014-8845
  13. Effects of nitrate supplementation and forage level on gas production, nitrogen balance and dry-matter degradation in sheep vol.59, pp.3, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1071/AN17759
  14. The effect of encapsulated nitrate and monensin on ruminal fermentation using a semi-continuous culture system1 vol.96, pp.8, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/sky211
  15. Encapsulated nitrate replacing soybean meal changes in vitro ruminal fermentation and methane production in diets differing in concentrate to forage ratio vol.90, pp.10, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1111/asj.13251
  16. Gut Microbiota of Wild and Captive Alpine Musk Deer ( Moschus chrysogaster ) vol.10, pp.None, 2011, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.03156
  17. Inhibition of methanogenesis by nitrate, with or without defaunation, in continuous culture vol.103, pp.8, 2011, https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2020-18325
  18. Dietary nitrate and presence of protozoa increase nitrate and nitrite reduction in the rumen of sheep vol.104, pp.5, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1111/jpn.13365
  19. Risk assessment of nitrate and nitrite in feed vol.18, pp.11, 2011, https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6290
  20. Effect of Methionine Supplementation on Rumen Microbiota, Fermentation, and Amino Acid Metabolism in In Vitro Cultures Containing Nitrate vol.9, pp.8, 2011, https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9081717
  21. Dynamics of the ruminal microbial ecosystem, and inhibition of methanogenesis and propiogenesis in response to nitrate feeding to Holstein calves vol.7, pp.4, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aninu.2021.07.005