Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society (한국산학기술학회논문지)

The Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society (한국산학기술학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of individuality-relatedness and well-being of the youth on creativity

청소년의 개별성-관계성과 안녕감이 창의성에 미치는 영향

  • Lee, Ji-Hye (Graduate School of Education, Sogang University) ;
  • Lee, Chang-H. (Department of Psychology, Sogang University)
  • Received : 2011.02.26
  • Accepted : 2011.05.12
  • Published : 2011.05.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study was conducted as an explorative effort to know significant variables on creativity. Particularly, with interest in individuality-relatedness and well-being, it is investigated that how those affect creativity of the youth. For this, a questionnaire measuring integrative creativity, individuality-relatedness and integrative well-being is given to 836 middle and high school students in Seoul and investigate relationship among variables. The results show higher individuality, relatedness and well-being tend to induce higher creativity. Each of individuality, relatedness and creativity has different influences on creativity. Over the whole creativity, explanation gets higher in order of individuality, well-being and relatedness. When creativity and well-being are classified into a sub-category, creative motivation has a high explanation in order of individuality, psychological well-being and relatedness. And creative attitude has a high explanation in order of individuality, relatedness and psychological well-being. About creative ability, all the predictors are explained in order of individuality, psychological well-being, relatedness, emotional well-being and social well-being.

본 연구는 창의성에 영향을 미치는 주요 변인에 대한 탐색 연구로 청소년의 개별성-관계성과 안녕감이 창의성에 어떠한 영향을 미치는지 알아보았다. 이를 위하여 서울시 소재 중 고등학생 836명에게 통합 창의성, 개별성-관계성, 통합 안녕감을 측정하는 설문지에 응답하도록 하고 이들의 관계성을 알아보았다. 연구결과 개별성, 관계성, 안녕감이 높은 청소년이 창의성이 높았다. 개별성, 관계성, 안녕감이 창의성에 미치는 영향력에는 차이가 있었는데, 개별성, 안녕감, 관계성의 순으로 설명력이 높았다. 창의성의 차원을 하위차원으로 구분하여 분석해본 결과 창의적 동기에는 개별성, 심리적 안녕감, 관계성의 순서로 설명력이 높았고, 창의적 태도에는 개별성, 관계성, 심리적 안녕감의 순서로 설명력이 높았다, 창의적 능력에는 개별성, 심리적 안녕감, 관계성, 정서 안녕감, 사회 안녕감의 순으로 모든 예언변인이 유의미하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. 고은미. 초등학생의 다중지능과 창의성 및 자아 개념과의 관계. 석사학위 논문, 원광대학교. 2005.
  2. 김동직.한성열. 개별성-관계성 척도의 제작과 타당화 연구. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격. 12(1), 71-93. 1998.
  3. 김동직. 문화적 맥락에서 본 개별성-관계성과 심리적 적응의 관계. 박사학위 논문, 고려대학교. 1999.
  4. 김신영, 백혜정. 한국청소년행복지수 개발 연구. 한국사회학, 42(6), 140-173. 2008.
  5. 김아영. "21세기 인재육성과 교육심리학의 과제: 지능과 창의성"에 대한 종합논의. 교육심리학회 연차학술대회지, 173-183 .2005.
  6. 김진숙. 창의적 성향, 창의적 능력, 변화 신념의 관계구조, 석사학위 논문, 전북대학교. 2006.
  7. 박병기, 강현숙. 자기보고형 통합 창의성 척도의 개발 및 타당화. 교육심리연구, 20(1), 155-177. 2006.
  8. 박영신, 김의철. 한국 사회와 개인 삶의 질 인식에 대한 토착심리 탐구. 삶의 질을 높이는 요소와 낮추는 요소에 대한 세대별 지각을 중심으로. 한국심리학회지: 사회문제, 12(1), 161-195. 2006.
  9. 이동원. 창의성 교육의 실천적 접근. 파주: 교육과학사. 2009.
  10. 이현주, 이미나, 최인수. 한국 청소년 안녕감척도 (K-WBSA)의 타당화 및 삶의 질 분석. 교육심리연구, 22(1), 301-315. 2008.
  11. 조명한, 김정오, 권석만. 청소년의 삶의 질. 서울대학교 사회과학과 정책연구, 16(2), 51-94. 1994.
  12. 임효신. 전문계 고등학교 학생의 창의성과 자아정체감 및 진로결정수준의 관계. 석사학위 논문, 서울대학교. 2010.
  13. 조정하. 창의성이 높은 학생의 학교 적응에 관한 연구. 석사학위 논문, 전남대학교. 2000.
  14. 전경원. 동.서양의 하모니를 위한 창의학. 서울: 학문사. 2000.
  15. 전경원. 창의성 교육의 이론과 실제. 서울 : 창지사. 2006.
  16. 정은이. 일상적 창의성과 개별성-관계성 및 심리.사회적 적응의 관계, 박사학위 논문, 고려대학교. 2002.
  17. 정준성. 아동의 창의성과 적응유연성 및 안녕감의 관계. 석사학위 논문, 성균관대학교. 2008.
  18. 허승연. 청소년의 행복에 영향을 미치는 생태체계 변인. 박사학위 논문, 숙명여자대학교. 2009.
  19. Amabile, T. M. The social psychology of creativity. New York: Springer-Verlag. 1983.
  20. Amabile, T. M. Creativity in context: Update to The Social Psychology of Creativity. Boulder, Colorado: Westview. 1996.
  21. Amabile, T. M. Creativity in context(2nd.ed): Update to "The Social Psychology of Creativity". Boulder, New York: Springer-Verlag. 1996.
  22. Barron, F. The psynology of creativity. In New Directions in psychology, II. NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. 1965.
  23. Barron, F. & Harrington. D. Creativity, intelligence, and personality. Annual Review of Psychology 32, 439-476. 1987
  24. Carlsson, I. Anxiety flexilbility of defense related to high or low creativity. Creativity Research Journal 14, 341-349. 2002. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326934CRJ1434_5
  25. Csikszentmihalyi, M. Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York: Harper Collins. 1996.
  26. Csikszentmihalyi, M. Creativity. 1996.
  27. Csikszentmihalyi, M. Society, Culture, and person: A systems view of creativity. The nature of creativity. Cambridge University Press, 325-339. 1988.
  28. Cushman, P. Way the self is empty: Toward a historically situated psychology. American Psychologist, 45, 599-611. 1990. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.45.5.599
  29. Diener, E., Diener, M., & Diener, C. Factors predicting the subjective well-being of nation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 653-663. 1995.
  30. Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Smith, H. L., Shao, L. National differences in subjective well-being: Why do the occur? Social Indicators Research 34, 7-32. 1995. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01078966
  31. Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 276-302. 1999. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.125.2.276
  32. Dolinger, S. J., Preston, L. A., O'Brien, S. P., & DiLalla, D. L. Individuality and relatedness of the self: An autobiographic study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 1268-1278. 1996. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.6.1268
  33. Dolinger, S. J., Preston, L. A., O'Brien, S. P., & Yee, D. Individuality and relatedness of the self: An autobiographic study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 1268-1278. 1996. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.6.1268
  34. Ed Diener and Robert Biswas-Diener Happiness: Unlocking the Mysteries of Psychological Wealth. 2008.
  35. Guilford, J. P. Creativity. Amercan Psycholgist, 5, 444-454. 1950. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0063487
  36. Guilford, J. P. Personality. New York: McGraw-Hill. 1959
  37. Guilford, J. P. The nature of human intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill. 1967.
  38. Guilford, J. P. Train of Creativity. In P.E. Vernon,(ed). Creativity, Middlesex, (pp.167-188). England: Penguin. . 1970.
  39. Guisinger, S., & Blatt, S. J. Individuality and relatedness: Evolution of a fundamental dialectic. American Psychlogist, 52, 1115-1124. 1994.
  40. Gurin, G., Veroff, J., & Feld, S. American view their mental health. New York: Bearly Limited. 1960.
  41. Isaksen, S. G., Puccio, G. J. & Treffinger, D. J. An Ecological approach to creativity research: profiling for creative problem solving. Journal of Creativity Behavior, 31(3), 212-226. 1993.
  42. Kagitcibasi, C. A critical appraisal of individualism-collectivism: Toward a new fomulation. In U. Kim, H. C. Triandis, C. 1994.
  43. Kagitcibasi, S-C. Choi, & G. Yoon (Eds.), Individualism and collectivism: Theory, method, and application (pp. 52-65). London:Sage
  44. Keyes, C. L. M. Social well-being. Society Psychology, 61, 121-140. 1998. https://doi.org/10.2307/2787065
  45. Keyes, C. L. M., Shmotkin, D., & Ryff, C. D. Optimizing well-being: The empirical encounter of two traditions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 1007-1022. 2002. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.1007
  46. Keyes, C. L. M. The subjective well-being of America's youth: Toward a comprehensive assessment. Adolescent and Family Health, 4, 1-32. 2005.
  47. Koestler, A, The act of creation. New York: MacMillan. 1964.
  48. Ludwig, A. M. The price of greatness. New York: Guilford Press. 1995.
  49. Mackinnon, D. W. The nature and nurture of creative talent. American Psychologist 17, 484-495. 1962. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0046541
  50. Mark A. Runco Creativity Theories and Themes : Research, Development, and Practice. 2007.
  51. Markus, H. R., & Wurf, E. The dynamic self-concept: A social psychological perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 38, 299-337. 1987. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.38.020187.001503
  52. Martin E.P. Seligman, Ph. D. Authentic Happiness : Using the New Positive Psychology to Realize Your Potential for Lasting Fulfillment. 2004.
  53. Maslow, A. H. The fartber reaches of human nature. New York: Viking. 1971.
  54. Maslow, A. H. Motivation and personality. New York: Haper & Row. 1954.
  55. Maslow, A. H. The creative attitude. The Structurist, 3, 4-10. 1963
  56. Nicol, J. J. & Long, B. C. Creativity and perceived stress of female music therapists and hobbyists. Creativity Research Journal 9(1), 1-10. 1996. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj0901_1
  57. Helgeson, V. S. Relation pf agency and communion to well-being: Evidence and potential Explanations. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 412-428. 1994 https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.116.3.412
  58. Osborn, A. F. Applied Imagination, Principles and procedures of creative problem-solving. NY: Charles Scribner's Sons. 1963.
  59. Perkins, D. N. The mind's best work Cambridge, MA: Havard University Press. 1981.
  60. Pennebaker, J. W. & Seagal, J. D. (1999) Forminf a story: The health benefits of chology 55, 1243-1254. 1999. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4679(199910)55:10<1243::AID-JCLP6>3.0.CO;2-N
  61. Reynold, F. Conversations about creativity and chronic illness I: Textile artists coping with long-term health problems reflect on the origins of their interest in art. Creativity Result Journal 15, 393-407. 2003. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326934CRJ1504_7
  62. Rogers, C. Towards a theory of creativity. ETC: A Review of General Semantics, 11, 249-260. 1954.
  63. Rogers, C. R. Toward a theory of creativity In S. J, NY: Scriboner's. 1954.
  64. Rogers, C. R. On becoming a person: A therapist's view of psychotherapy. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. 1995.
  65. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 141-166. 2001. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.141
  66. Ryff, C. D. Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of personality and Social Psychology, 57, 1069-1081. 1989. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.6.1069
  67. Ryff, C. D., & Keyes, C. L. M The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 719-727. 1995. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.69.4.719
  68. Sampson, E. E. The debate on individualism: Indigenous psychologies and their role in personal and social functioninig. American Psychologist, 43, 15-22. 1988. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.43.1.15
  69. Scott, M. E. How stress can affect gifted/creative potential: Ideas to better insure realization of potential. Creative Child and Adult Quarterly 10, 240-249. 1985.
  70. Smith, G. J. W. & Van der Meer, G. creativity in old age. In M. A. Runco & R. Richards(Eds.), Eminent creativity, everyday creativity, and health, 333-353. Greenwich, CT: Ablex. 1997.
  71. Sternberg, R. J. The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives. Now York, NY: Cambridge University Press. 1988.
  72. Sternberg, R. J. & Lubart, T. I. Investing in Creativity. American Psychologist, July. 1996. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.51.7.677
  73. Tardif, T. Z. & Sternberg, R. J. What do we knew dbout creativity? In R. J. Sternberg, The nature of creativity. Cambridge University. pp.429-440. 1988.
  74. Taylor, C. W. (Ed). The nature of the creative press. In P. Smith(Ed.), Creativity: An examination of the creative press. New York: Hastings House. 1959.
  75. Taylor, C. W. Finding the Creative. Scientific Research, 38. 6-11. 1961.
  76. Tina Seelig What I Wish I Knew When I Was 20. 2009. 이수경(역) 스무살에 알았더라면 좋았을 것들. 서울: (주)웅진씽크빅 2010.
  77. Torrance, E. P. Creativity in the classroom: What research says to the teacher. Washington D. C: National Education Association. 1977.
  78. Torrance, E. P. The search for satori and creativity. Buffalo, Ny: Creative Education Foundation. 1979a.
  79. Torrance, E. P. Unique needs of the creative child and adult. In A. H. Passow (Ed.), The gifted and talented: their education and development. 78th NSSE Yearbook, 352-371. Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education. 1979b
  80. Torrance, E. P. Rewarding creative Behavior: Enperience in classroom creativity. England Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. 1988.
  81. Veron, P. The nature-nurture problem in creativity. In J.A. Glover,R.R.Ronning, and C.R.Reynolds (Eds.), Handbook of Creativity, New York: Plenum Press. pp.93-110. 1989.
  82. Weisberg, R. W. Problem solving and creativity. In R. J. Sternberg(Ed). The nature of creativity: contemporary psychologist perspectives. University of Cambridge Press. pp. 148-176. 1988.
  83. Woike, B. A. The use of differentiation and integration processes: Empirical studies of "separate" and "connected" ways of thinking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 142-150. 1994. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.1.142