Comparing Medical Efficacy of Socheongyong-tang with Lactic Acid Bacteria Fermented Socheongyong-tang

소청룡탕과 유산균 발효 소청룡탕의 약리효능의 비교

  • Han, Jong-Hyun (Department of Pharmacology, School of Oriental Medicine, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Lee, Seung-Yong (Department of Pharmacology, School of Oriental Medicine, Wonkwang University)
  • 한종현 (원광대학교 한의과대학 약리학교실) ;
  • 이승용 (원광대학교 한의과대학 약리학교실)
  • Received : 2010.12.10
  • Accepted : 2011.04.06
  • Published : 2011.04.25

Abstract

To compare the medical efficacy of original Socheongyong-tang with fermented Socheongyong-tang, we've studied the two medicines according to the search for optimal bacteria and optimal conditions, component analysis, assessment of medical efficacy and toxicity, and have the result below. The results were obtained as follows: Considering bacterial growth, $CO_2$ gas emission and pH, we examined that using 3 kinds of bacteria(S. cerevisiae KCTC 7913, L. casei KCTC 3109, L. brevis KCTC 3102) is desirable. There is no main difference in optimum conditions between incubator and shaking incubator. And it is considered that ideal fermentation time is 2 days after vaccination. As the result of componential analysis of before and after fermentation, there's a noticeable decrease of total sugar and protein. But there's no alterations in total phenolics compounds and in total flavonoid compounds that influence on medical effect. The result was interpreted that it can promote the assimilation of herbal decoction after fermentation. As the result of medical efficacy assessment, we can check out that there is more anti-oxidating effects in fermented Socheongyong-tang, whereas anti-inflammatory effects and obesity-preventing effects were favorable in original Socheongyong-tang. And there is no main difference of whitening and COX-2 removing effects between before and after the fermentation. As a result of assessing weight change, hepatotoxicity and nephrotoxicity, we can not notice any unusual difference between before and after the fermentation. According to the results above, it is considered that we checked out the optimal bacteria and optimal conditions, advantages and disadvantages of the medical efficacy of original Socheongyong-tang and fermented Socheongyong-tang. And we suggest that there will have to be a following in-depth and systematic research on this subject in the future.

Keywords

References

  1. 대한병리학회 대구․경북지부학회. 간추린 병리학, 서울, 정문각, 2000.
  2. 김기영, 송호준 편저. 韓藥炮製學, 신일상사, p 547, 2002.
  3. 이상인, 안덕균, 신민교. 韓方臨床應用, 서울, 성보사, p 44, 49, 50, 56, 62, 64, 79, 82, 101, 105, 122, 130, 140, 142, 181, 299, 317, 359, 361, 399, 525, 1982.
  4. 황도연. 方藥合編, 서울, 남산당, p 122, 1983.
  5. 박영순. 한방의 약리해설 개정판, 아카데미서적, 2002.
  6. 기능성화장품의 유효성평가를 위한 가이드라인, 식품의약품안전청, 2003.
  7. 정진호, 조윤희. 미용관련 기능성시험, 건강기능식품 시험법가이드, 식품의약품안정청, 2004.
  8. 이혜경. 小靑龍湯과 加味小靑龍湯이 I형 및 IV형 Allergy 반응과 폐부종에 미치는 영향, 대전대학교 대학원, 1995.
  9. 차은수, 정희재, 정승기, 이형구. 小靑龍湯이 알레르기 천식의 호흡양상과 기관조직에 미치는 영향, 경희의학 15(1):78-89, 1995.
  10. 김석산. 小靑龍湯合玉屛風散이 알레르기 鼻炎에 미치는 効果, 경원대학교 대학원, 2005.
  11. 김상현. 한약의 효율성 개선을 위한 발효한약 유용성에 관한 연구, 경기대 대체의학대학원석사, 2009.
  12. 김준형. 人蔘成分이 Zymomonas mobilis의 알콜醱酵에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구, 중앙대 대학원 석사, 1984.
  13. 노성구. 인삼전분의 알코올발효 적성과 발효 인삼약주의 성분 분석 중앙대대학원석사, 1999.
  14. 강석균. 기관지천식에 사용되는 加味小靑龍湯의 임상적 고찰, 대한한의학회지 10(1):138-144, 1989.
  15. 공병만. 백삼, 홍삼, 발효인삼 농축액의 이화학적특성 및 약리효능에 관한 연구, 경희대 대학원박사, 2008.
  16. 김기창, 이형구. 小靑龍湯의 鎭痛, 抗痙攣및 흰쥐의 肺損傷에 미치는 影響, 경희한의대논문집, 8(1):129-138, 1985.
  17. 고성권, 이충렬, 이학성, 김 현, 백구현, 토쿠오카 키요시, 정성현, 종대황. 스틸벤 유도체의 cyclooxygenase 저해작용, 생약학회지 34: 25-27, 2003.
  18. 姜東希, 高僖鮮, 金現洙. 발효한약의 특성분석, 自然科學硏究論集 27(1):45-53, 2008.
  19. 신언환. 김치에서 분리한 Lactobacillus brevis의 생장 특성에 관한 연구,I:Sourdough 배지의 영양 조성 최적화, 한국식품영양학회지 15(3):215-219, 2002.
  20. Dale, M.M., and Foreman, J.C. Introduction to the immnology and pathology of host defece mechanism & the neutrophil leucocyte, Textbook of Immunopharmacology 1-18, pp 37-55, 1989.
  21. Seibert, K., Zhang, Y., Leahy, K., Hause, S., Masferrer, J., Perkins, W., Lee, L., Isakson, P. Pharmacological and biochemical demonstration of the role of cyclooxygenase 2 in inflammation and pain, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 91: 12013-12017, 1994. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.91.25.12013
  22. Bombardier, C. An evidence-based evaluation of the gastrointestinal safety of coxibs, The americal journal of cardiology 89: 3D-9D, 2002.
  23. Flattery, M.P., Hylton Gravatt, L.A. COX-2 inhibitors and cardiovascular risk. Progress in Cardiovascular Nursing, 20: 123-125, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0889-7204.2005.04034.x
  24. Kortz, F., Schiele, T.M., Klauss, V., Sohn, H.Y. Selective COX-2 inhibitors and risk of myocardial infarction, Journal of Vascular Research 42: 312-324, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1159/000086459
  25. Linton, M.F., Fazio, S. Cyclooxygenase-2 and inflammation in atherosclerosis, Current Opinion in Pharmacology 4: 116-123, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coph.2003.12.003
  26. Johnson, J.L., Wimsatt, J., Buckel, S.D., Dyer, R.D. and Maddipati, K.R. Purification and characterization of prostaglandin H sunthase-2 from sheep placental cotyledons, Arch. Biochem, Biophys. 324: 26-34, 1995. https://doi.org/10.1006/abbi.1995.9934
  27. Virador, V.M., Kobayashi, N., Matsunaga, J. and Hearing, V.J. A standardized protocol for assessing regulators of pigmentation, Anal. Biochem. 270: 207-219, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1006/abio.1999.4090
  28. Laurent Bedouet, Maria Jose Schuller, Frederic Marin, Christian Milet, Evelyne Lopexl Michel Giraud : Soluble proteins of the nacre of the giant oyster Pinctada maxima and of the abalone Haliotis tuberculata, extraction and partial analysis of nacre proteins, Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology 128: 389-400, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-4959(00)00337-7
  29. Fitzgerald, G.A. and Patrono, C. : The coxibs, selective inhibitors of cyclooxygenase-2, N. Engl. J. Med. 345: 433-442, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM200108093450607
  30. Grosser, T., Fries, S. and Fitzgerald, G.A. Biological basis for the cardiovascular consequences of COX-2 inhibition: therapeutic challenges and opportunities, J. Clin. Invest. 116: 4-15, 2006
  31. Dubois, M., Gilles, K.A., Hamilton, J.K., Rebers, P.A. and Smith, F. Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances, Anal. Chem. 28: 350-356, 1956. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac60111a017
  32. Blois, M.S. Antioxidant determinations by the use of a stable free radical, Nature 181: 1199-1200, 1958. https://doi.org/10.1038/1811199a0
  33. Gao, I., Igarashi, K., & NuKina, M. Three new phenylethanoid glycosides from Caryopteris incana and their antioxidative activity, Chemical and Farmaceutical Blletin 48: 1075-1078, 2000.
  34. Aruoma, O.I. Nutrition and health aspects of free radicals and antioxidants, Food and chemical Toxicology 62: 671-683, 1994.
  35. Madavi, D.L., & Salunkhe, D.K. Toxicological aspects of food antioxidant, Food antioxidants, New York, Marcel Dekker, p 267, 1995.
  36. Blois, M.S. Antioxidant determinations by the use of a stable free radicals, Nature 181: 1199-2000, 1958. https://doi.org/10.1038/1811199a0
  37. Lowry, O.H., Rosebrough, N.J., Farr, A.L., and Randall, R.J. Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent, J. Biol. Chem. 193: 265-275, 1951.
  38. Vane, J. and Botting, R. Inflammation and the mechanism of action of antiinflammatory drugs, FASEB. J. 1: 89-96, 1987. https://doi.org/10.1096/fasebj.1.2.3111928
  39. Dawson, W. and Willoughby, D.A. Inflammation mechanism and mediator, Nonsterodial antiinflammatory drugs of therapeutics, pp 77-109, 1985.