DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on Efficient Implementation of the e-Government in the Developing Countries

개발도상국의 효율적인 전자정부 구현에 관한 연구

  • Park, Chul-Geun (Department of Information and Communications Engineering, Sunmoon University) ;
  • Suh, Sung-Chul (Department of Information and Communications Engineering, Sunmoon University)
  • 박철근 (선문대학교 정보통신공학과) ;
  • 서성철 (선문대학교 정보통신공학과)
  • Received : 2011.07.19
  • Accepted : 2011.09.08
  • Published : 2011.09.30

Abstract

Dynamic development of the Information Communications and Technology is changing countries around the world to establish the e-government to enhance their national administrative system efficiently. This paper proposes the method to implement the e-government efficiently in the developing countries. To reach the goal, the e-government development indices evaluated by United Nations are analyzed to catch the clues to take-off the e-government development stage. In addition, we scrutinize the e-Government Master Plans of Mongolia, Kyrgyzstan and Nepal supported by Korea in order to elicit the priority projects which are the indispensible components on the way of building e-government. We cross-check and standardize the projects which the investigation target countries define respectively. We also analyze the projects which are evaluated by their priorities in compliance with the portfolio method to elicit the road map of the optimum which is able to implement the e-government efficiently with reducing trials and errors.

정보통신기술의 급속한 발전과 함께 전 세계 국가들은 전자정부를 도입하여 국가의 행정시스템을 효율적으로 개선하기 위하여 노력하고 있다. 본 논문은 개발도상국이 효율적으로 전자정부를 구현하기 위한 방안을 제안한다. 이를 위하여 유엔이 평가한 전자정부 발전지수를 분석하여 전자정부 발전 단계를 시작하는 단초를 얻는다, 또한 한국이 지원한 몽골, 키르기즈스탄 및 네팔의 전자정부 현황과 전자정부 마스터플랜을 분석하여 전자정부를 구축하는 데 필수불가결한 요소인 사업 우선순위를 도출한다. 조사 대상국들이 각각 정의한 사업들을 비교 검토하여 표준화하고, 포트폴리오 방식에 의해 평가된 사업들의 우선순위를 비교 분석하여 시행착오를 줄이고 효율적으로 전자정부를 구현할 수 있는 최적의 로드맵을 도출한다.

Keywords

References

  1. Kim Dong Won et al., e-Government Theory, Daeyoungmoonhwasa, 2007.
  2. Hwang Seoung Don/Jung Chung Sik, Understanding of e-Government, Dasanchulpansa, 2002.
  3. www.un.org, 2011.
  4. www.oecd.org, 2011.
  5. T. Almarabeh, A. AbuAli, A general Framework for e-Government:Definition Maturity Challenges, Opportunities, and Success, 2010.
  6. e-Government of Participatory Government, Government Innovation and Decentralization Committee, 2005.
  7. e-Government White Paper, e-Government Special Committee, 2003.
  8. 2011 e-Government Development Framework for Master Plan Building, NIPA, 2011.
  9. Jung Seung Ryeul, Kim Kyung Seop, Key Success Factors sawn by domestic e-government representatives' perspective, KIEC, 2004.
  10. Suh Sung Chul, A Study on efficient implementation of the e-government in the Developing Countries, Master's Thesis, 2011. 6
  11. www.unpan.org, 2011.
  12. The World Fact Book, CIA, 20011.
  13. UN e-Government Survey 2008, United Nations New York, 2008.
  14. UN e-Government Survey 2010, United Nations New York, 2010.
  15. www.egovframe.go.kr, 2011.
  16. e-Government Master Plan in Mongolia, KIPA, 2005.
  17. e-Government Master Plan of Kyrgyzstan, MKE, 2009.
  18. e-Government Master Plan in Nepal, KIPA, 2006.