DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Food Ethics Approach to Court Case of Inferior Quality Mandu Stuffing

불량만두소 사건에 대한 음식 윤리적 접근

  • Kim, Suk-Shin (Department of Food Science and Nutrition, The Catholic University of Korea)
  • 김석신 (가톨릭대학교 식품영양학과)
  • Received : 2011.06.08
  • Accepted : 2011.09.08
  • Published : 2011.10.30

Abstract

This study was performed to approach the 2004 case of inferior quality mandu stuffing from the stance of food ethics. The court convicted the producers of inferior quality mandu stuffing and also decided against the plaintiffs who filed a damage suit. The core of the mandu stuffing case was not safety, but the wholesomeness. The principles of food ethics include a respect for life, justice, environmental preservation, and the priority of safety. The virtues of food professionals include wisdom, honesty, faithfulness, courage, moderation, and integrity. A food producer should possess not only the ability but also the morality to make food. The consumer should urge the producers to strengthen their morality and be conscious of responsibility and fairness. The government should organize a system to establish food ethics, and make efforts to reduce wasteful law enforcement. The media should lead public opinion toward justice by doing an unbiased and in-depth report and help establish the idea of food ethics. The necessity of food ethics and the spread of the ethical mind are the most important points of all.

Keywords

References

  1. 김덕웅, 정수현, 염동민, 신성균, 여생규. 2007. 21C 식품위생학. 수학사. 서울. pp 20-20
  2. 김석신, 신승환. 2011. 잃어버린 밥상 잊어버린 윤리. 북마루지. pp 65-73, 76-77, 87-88, 93-97
  3. 김성수. 1999. 한국기업의 비윤리적 행위에 관한 조사 연구. 기업윤리연구 1:221-240
  4. 배은주. 2008. 만두 산업의 현황과 전망. 동아시아식생활학회 학술발표대회 논문집. pp 51-67
  5. 식품의약품안전청. 2010. 식품공전. 식품의약품안전청. 서울. pp 5-2-1
  6. 이종영. 2006. 쓰레기를 먹었다!-윤리적 돌발사고, 불량 만두 사건. 기업윤리연구 12:113-122
  7. 이철호. 2005. 식품위생사건백서 II. 고려대학교출판부. 서울. pp 275-307
  8. 장승희. 2001. '장인정신'의 현대적 활용을 통한 직업윤리교육 방안. 국민윤리연구. 48:63-84
  9. 정기혜. 2004. '불량만두'를 통해 본 식품안전 보도의 문제. 신문과 방송. 404:64-67
  10. 진교훈. 1998. 환경윤리-동서양의 자연보존과 생명존중. 민음사. 서울. pp 101-129
  11. 한국식품과학회. 2006. 식품과학용어사전. 광일문화사. 서울. p 116
  12. 허남결. 2006. 공직사회 윤리의식의 사회문화적 배경과 그 변화 가능성. 국민윤리연구 63:1-21
  13. Cho GA. 2010. A study on dumpling consumer recognition and purchase attribute. Masters degree thesis. Sookmyung Women's University. pp 9-10
  14. Choi SR. 2010. Risk communication revitalization by analysis of food incidents. Ph.D. dissertation. Chosun University. pp 4-65
  15. Kim JY, Kim KB, Park IS. 2009. Perceptions of mandu and usage behaviors by mandu type. J. East Asian Soc. Dietary Life. 19(5):690-702
  16. Kim RB. 2009. Meeting consumer concerns for food safety in South Korea: the importance of food safety and ethics in a globalizing market. J. Agric. Environ. Ethics. 22:141-152 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-008-9130-9
  17. Korea Consumer Agency. 2007. The 6th Report on Consumer Behavior and Value System Survey in Korea. Korea Consumer Agency. Seoul. pp 40-41
  18. Modin PG, Hansson SO. 2011. Moral and instrumental norms in food risk communication. J. Business Ethics. (published online: DOI 10.1007/s10551-010-0724-6)
  19. Song IS. 2005. A Study on the ethical dimension and contents of consumption. J. Consumer Studies. 16(2):37-55
  20. Sperling D. 2010. Food law, ethics, and food safety regulations: roles, justifications, and expected limits. J. Agric. Environ. Ethics. 23:267-278 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-009-9194-1
  21. 국가기록원 나라기록. 2006. 2008. http://contents.archives.go.kr/next/content/listSubjectDescription.do?id=001625&pageFlag=A
  22. 노컷뉴스. 2005. http://www.cbs.co.kr/nocut/show.asp?idx=91912
  23. 로이슈. 2006.http://www.lawissue.co.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=1651
  24. 식품의약품안전청. 2005.http://kfda.go.kr/index.kfda?mid=59&seq=20&cmd=v
  25. 한국신문윤리위원회. 신문윤리강령. 1957. http://www.ikpec.or.kr/principle/p01.asp
  26. KBS 뉴스a. 2004. 6. 11
  27. KBS 뉴스b. 2004. 6. 6
  28. KBS 뉴스c. 2004. 6. 11
  29. KBS 뉴스d. 2004. 11. 2
  30. KBS 방송강령. 1990. http://www.kbs.co.kr/openkbs/