DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Energy-Efficient Adaptive Dynamic Sensor Scheduling for Target Monitoring in Wireless Sensor Networks

  • Zhang, Jian (College of Information Science and Engineering, Northeastern University) ;
  • Wu, Cheng-Dong (College of Information Science and Engineering, Northeastern University) ;
  • Zhang, Yun-Zhou (College of Information Science and Engineering, Northeastern University) ;
  • Ji, Peng (College of Information Science and Engineering, Northeastern University)
  • Received : 2011.01.16
  • Accepted : 2011.06.10
  • Published : 2011.12.31

Abstract

Due to uncertainties in target motion and randomness of deployed sensor nodes, the problem of imbalance of energy consumption arises from sensor scheduling. This paper presents an energy-efficient adaptive sensor scheduling for a target monitoring algorithm in a local monitoring region of wireless sensor networks. Owing to excessive scheduling of an individual node, one node with a high value generated by a decision function is preferentially selected as a tasking node to balance the local energy consumption of a dynamic clustering, and the node with the highest value is chosen as the cluster head. Others with lower ones are in reserve. In addition, an optimization problem is derived to satisfy the problem of sensor scheduling subject to the joint detection probability for tasking sensors. Particles of the target in particle filter algorithm are resampled for a higher tracking accuracy. Simulation results show this algorithm can improve the required tracking accuracy, and nodes are efficiently scheduled. Hence, there is a 41.67% savings in energy consumption.

Keywords

References

  1. Z. Merhi, M. Elgamel, and M.Bayoumi, "A Lightweight Collaborative Fault Tolerant Target Localization System for Wireless Sensor Networks," IEEE Trans. Mobile Comput., vol. 8, no. 12, Dec. 2009, pp. 1690-1704. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMC.2009.81
  2. Lasse Klingbeil and T. Wark, "A Wireless Sensor Network for Real-time Indoor Localization and Motion Monitoring," Int. Conf. Info. Process. Sensor Netw., 2008, pp. 39-50.
  3. T. Wark et al., "The Design and Evaluation of a Mobile Sensor/Actuator Network for Autonomous Animal Control," IPSN, 2007, pp. 206-215.
  4. F. Akyildiz et al., "Wireless Sensor Networks: A Survey," Comput. Netw., vol. 38, no. 4, Mar. 2002, pp. 393-442. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1389-1286(01)00302-4
  5. S. Gezici et al. "Localization via Ultra-Wideband Radios: A Look at Positioning Aspects for Future Sensor Networks," IEEE Signal Process. Mag., vol. 22, no. 4, 2005, pp. 70-84.
  6. M. Rudafshani and S. Datta, "Localization in Wireless Sensor Networks," Info. Process. Sensor Netw., 2007, pp. 51-60.
  7. M.S. Brandstein, J.E. Adcock, and H.F. Silverman, "A Closed-Form Location Estimator for Use with Room Environment Microphone Arrays," IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process., vol. 5, no. 1, Jan. 1997, pp. 45-50. https://doi.org/10.1109/89.554268
  8. N. Patwari et al., "Relative Location Estimation in Wireless Sensor Networks," IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 51, no. 8, Aug. 2003. pp. 2137-2148. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSP.2003.814469
  9. T. He et al., "Range-Free Localization Schemes for Large Scale Sensor Networks," Proc. ACM Mobicom, San Diego, CA, 2003, pp. 81-95.
  10. B. Xiao, H. Chen, and S. Zhou, "Distributed Localization Using a Moving Beacon in Wireless Sensor Networks," IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst., vol. 19, no. 5, May 2008, pp. 587-600. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPDS.2007.70773
  11. X. Sheng and Y. Hu, "Maximum Likelihood Multiple-Source Localization Using Acoustic Energy Measurements with Wireless Sensor Networks," IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 53, no. 1, Jan. 2005, pp. 44-53 . https://doi.org/10.1109/TSP.2004.838930
  12. R. Niu and P.K. Varshney, "Target Location Estimation in Sensor Networks with Quantized Data," IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 54, no. 12, Dec. 2006, pp. 4519-4528. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSP.2006.882082
  13. W. Chen, J.C. Hou, and L. Sha, "Dynamic Clustering for Acoustic Target Tracking in Wireless Sensor Networks," IEEE Trans. Mobile Comput., vol. 3, no. 3, Aug. 2004, pp. 258-271. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMC.2004.22
  14. R. Tharmarasa, T. Kirubarajan, and M.L. Hernandez, "Large-Scale Optimal Sensor Array Management for Multitarget Tracking," IEEE Trans. Syst. Man, Cybern., Part C: Appl. Rev., vol. 37, no. 5, 2007, pp. 803-814.
  15. L. Zuo, R. Niu, and P.K. Varshney, "A Sensor Selection Approach for Target Tracking in Sensor Networks with Quantized Measurements," 16th Int. IEEE Symp. Personal, Indoor, Mobile Radio Commun., 2005, pp. 2521-2524.
  16. J. Jafaryahya et al., "Sensor Selection for Target Tracking in Binary Sensor Networks Using Particle Filter," IEEE Digital Object Identifier, 2010, pp. 1-5.
  17. J. Lin et al., "Energy-Efficient Distributed Adaptive Multisensor Scheduling for Target Tracking in Wireless Sensor Networks," IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., vol. 58, no. 6, 2009, pp. 1886-1896. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2008.2005822
  18. X.-H. Kuang, R. Feng, and H.-H. Shao, "A Lightweight Target- Tracking Scheme Using Wireless Sensor Network," Meas. Sci. Technol., vol. 19, no. 2, 2008, 025104. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/19/2/025104
  19. M. Zoghi and M.H. Kahaei, "Adaptive Sensor Selection in Wireless Sensor Networks for Target Tracking," IET Signal Process., vol. 4, no. 5, Oct. 2010, pp. 530-536. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-spr.2008.0205
  20. B.P. Michael, Random Process in Linear Systems, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 2002.
  21. J. Miguez et al., "Particle Filtering for Systems with Unknown Noise Probability Distributions," IEEE Workshop Statistical Signal Process., 2003, pp. 522-525.
  22. W.R. Heinzelman, A. Chandrakasan, and H. Balakrishnan, "Energy-Efficient Communication Protocol for Wireless Microsensor Networks," Proc. 33rd Ann. Hawaii Int. Conf. Syst. Sci., 2000, pp. 3005-3014.

Cited by

  1. A solid electrolyte potentiometric CO2 gas sensor composed of lithium phosphate as both the reference and the solid electrolyte materials vol.61, pp.6, 2012, https://doi.org/10.3938/jkps.61.938
  2. Encapsulation of Semiconductor Gas Sensors with Gas Barrier Films for USN Application vol.34, pp.5, 2011, https://doi.org/10.4218/etrij.12.0112.0266
  3. 다중모드 회로망 분석을 이용한 광대역 혼 안테나의 효율적인 설계 vol.16, pp.4, 2012, https://doi.org/10.7471/ikeee.2012.16.4.297
  4. Tone-Independent Orthogonalizing Lattice Equalization for Insufficient Cyclic-Prefix OFDM Transmissions vol.9, pp.12, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/281895
  5. Energy-Balanced Scheduling for Target Tracking in Wireless Sensor Networks vol.11, pp.1, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1145/2629596
  6. Energy Efficient Cluster Based Scheduling Scheme for Wireless Sensor Networks vol.2015, pp.None, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/185198
  7. Transceiver Optimization for ToA-Based Localization of Mobile WSN vol.25, pp.9, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1142/s0218126616501000
  8. Energy-efficient cooperative localization in mobile WSN : ENERGY-EFFICIENT COOPERATIVE LOCALIZATION IN MOBILE WSN vol.12, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1002/tee.22346
  9. Demand-based charging strategy for wireless rechargeable sensor networks vol.41, pp.3, 2011, https://doi.org/10.4218/etrij.2018-0126
  10. A New on-Demand Recharging Strategy Based on Cycle-Limitation in a WRSN vol.11, pp.8, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3390/sym11081028
  11. A Sensing Device with the Optical Temperature Sensors-Based Quad-RX Module and a Security Module vol.21, pp.5, 2011, https://doi.org/10.3390/s21051620
  12. LEACH-MTC: A Network Energy Optimization Algorithm Constraint as Moving Target Prediction vol.11, pp.19, 2011, https://doi.org/10.3390/app11199064