DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Rainfed Areas and Animal Agriculture in Asia: The Wanting Agenda for Transforming Productivity Growth and Rural Poverty

  • Devendra, C. (Consulting Tropical Animal Production Systems Specialist)
  • 발행 : 2012.01.01

초록

The importance of rainfed areas and animal agriculture on productivity enhancement and food security for economic rural growth in Asia is discussed in the context of opportunities for increasing potential contribution from them. The extent of the rainfed area of about 223 million hectares and the biophysical attributes are described. They have been variously referred to inter alia as fragile, marginal, dry, waste, problem, threatened, range, less favoured, low potential lands, forests and woodlands, including lowlands and uplands. Of these, the terms less favoured areas (LFAs), and low or high potential are quite widely used. The LFAs are characterised by four key features: i) very variable biophysical elements, notably poor soil quality, rainfall, length of growing season and dry periods, ii) extreme poverty and very poor people who continuously face hunger and vulnerability, iii) presence of large populations of ruminant animals (buffaloes, cattle, goats and sheep), and iv) have had minimum development attention and an unfinished wanting agenda. The rainfed humid/sub-humid areas found mainly in South East Asia (99 million ha), and arid/semi-arid tropical systems found in South Asia (116 million ha) are priority agro-ecological zones (AEZs). In India for example, the ecosystem occupies 68% of the total cultivated area and supports 40% of the human and 65% of the livestock populations. The area also produces 4% of food requirements. The biophysical and typical household characteristics, agricultural diversification, patterns of mixed farming and cropping systems are also described. Concerning animals, their role and economic importance, relevance of ownership, nomadic movements, and more importantly their potential value as the entry point for the development of LFAs is discussed. Two examples of demonstrated success concern increasing buffalo production for milk and their expanded use in semi-arid AEZs in India, and the integration of cattle and goats with oil palm in Malaysia. Revitalised development of the LFAs is justified by the demand for agricultural land to meet human needs e.g. housing, recreation and industrialisation; use of arable land to expand crop production to ceiling levels; increasing and very high animal densities; increased urbanisation and pressure on the use of available land; growing environmental concerns of very intensive crop production e.g. acidification and salinisation with rice cultivation; and human health risks due to expanding peri-urban poultry and pig production. The strategies for promoting productivity growth will require concerted R and D on improved use of LFAs, application of systems perspectives for technology delivery, increased investments, a policy framework and improved farmer-researcher-extension linkages. These challenges and their resolution in rainfed areas can forcefully impact on increased productivity, improved livelihoods and human welfare, and environmental sustainability in the future.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. ADB (Asian Development Bank). 1989. Rainfed agriculture in Asia and the Pacific. Asian development Bank, Manila, Philippines, p. 91.
  2. ADB. 2009 .The economics of climate change in South East Asia: a regional review. Asian Development Bank, Manila, Philippines, p. 225.
  3. Alexandratos, N. 1995. World Agriculture towards 2010. FAO, Rome, Italy, p. 488.
  4. Alston, J., M. C. Marra, P. Pardey and T. J. Wyatt. 1998. Research returns redux: a meta- analysis of the returns to agricultural R and D. EPTD Discussion Paper No. 38, IFPRI, Washington, DC, USA.
  5. Birthal, P. S. 2008. Linking smallholder livestock procedures to markets: Issues and approaches. Indian J. Agric. Econ. 63:19-37.
  6. CGIAR/TAC (Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research/Technical Advisory Committee). 2000. 'CGIAR priorities for marginal lands', CGIAR, Washington, USA. (Mimeograph).
  7. Cornia, A. 1985. Farm size, land yields and the agricultural production function: an analysis for fifteen developing countries. World. Dev. 13:513-534. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(85)90054-3
  8. Dastagiri, M. B. 2010. The effect of government expenditures on promoting livestock GDP and reducing rural poverty in India. Outlook Agric. 39:127-133. https://doi.org/10.5367/000000010791745402
  9. Deolalikar, A. 1981. The inverse relationship between productivity and farm size. A test using data from India. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 63:263-275.
  10. Devendra, C. 1989. Ruminant production systems in the developing countries: resource utilization. In: Feeding strategies for improved productivity of ruminant livestock in developing countries, IAEA, Vienna, Austria, p 5.
  11. Devendra, C. 1999. Goats: Challenges of increased productivity and improved livelihoods. Outlook Agric. 28:215-226.
  12. Devendra, C. 2004. Integrated tree crops - ruminants systems. The potential importance of the oil palm. Outlook Agric. 33:157-166. https://doi.org/10.5367/0000000042530231
  13. Devendra, C. 2005. Improvement of crop-animal systems in rainfed agriculture in South East Asia. In: Proc. Int. Conf. on Livestock-Crop Systems to Meet the Challenges of Globalisation (Ed. P. Rawlinson, C. Wachirapakorn, P. Pakdee and M. Wanapat). Khon Kaen, Thailand, 1:220-231.
  14. Devendra, C. 2007a. Perspectives on animal production systems in Asia. Livest. Sci. 106:1-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2006.05.005
  15. Devendra, C. 2007b. Small farm systems to feed hungry Asia Outlook Agric. 36:7-20. https://doi.org/10.5367/000000007780223641
  16. Devendra, C. 2007c. Goats: biology, production and development in Asia. Academy of Sciences Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. p. 246.
  17. Devendra, C. 2009.Intensification of integrated oil palm-ruminant systems: enhancing increased productivity and sustainability in South East Asia. Outlook Agric. 38:71-82. https://doi.org/10.5367/000000009787762734
  18. Devendra, C. 2010a. Small farms in Asia. Revitalising agricultural production, food security and rural prosperity. Academy of Sciences Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. p. 175.
  19. Devendra, C. 2010b. Food production from animals in Asia: priority for expanding the developing frontiers. ASM Science J. 4:173-184.
  20. Devendra, C. 2011. Integrated tree crops-ruminants systems in South East Asia: Advances in productivity enhancement and environmental sustainability. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 24:587-602. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2011.r.07
  21. Devendra, C. 2012. Climate change threats and effects : challenges for agriculture and food security. Academy of Science Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia (In press).
  22. Devendra, C. and C. Chantalakhana. 2002. Animals, poor people and food insecurity: opportunities for improved livelihoods through natural resource management. Outlook Agric. 31:161-176. https://doi.org/10.5367/000000002101294010
  23. Devendra, C. and R. A. Leng. 2011. Feed resources for animals in Asia: Issues, strategies for use, intensification and integration for increased productivity. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 24:303-321. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2011.r.05
  24. Devendra, C. and D. Thomas. 2001. Crop-animal interactions in mixed farming systems in Asia. Agric. Syst. 71:27-40.
  25. Devendra, C., D. Thomas, M. A. Jabbar and H. Kudo. 1997. Improvement of livestock production in crop-animal systems in the rainfed agro-ecological zones of South East Asia. Nairobi, Kenya. p. 107.
  26. Edwards, P., H. Demaine, N. Innes-Taylor and D. Turongruan. 1996. Sustainable aquaculture for small-scale farmers: need for a balanced model. Outlook Agric. 25:9-26.
  27. Ellis, F. and H. A. Freeman. 2000. Rural livelihoods and poverty reduction strategies in four African countries. J. Dev. Stud. 40:1-30.
  28. Fan, S. and P. Hazell. 2000. Should developing countries invest more in less- favored lands? An empirical analysis of rural India. Econ. Polit.Wkly 35:1455-1564.
  29. Fan, S., P. Hazell and S. Thorat. 2000. Targetting public investments by agroecological zone to achieve growth and poverty alleviation goals in rural India. Food Policy 20:411-428.
  30. Fan, S., L. Zhang and X. Zhang. 2000. Growth and poverty in rural China: The role of public investments. Environment and Production Technology Division Discussion Paper No.66, International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington DC, USA.
  31. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organisation). 1996. FAO AGROSTAT 1995, 49, FAO, Rome, Italy.
  32. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organisation). 1997. FAO Prod.Yearbook,1996,50, FAO, Rome, Italy. p. 235.
  33. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organisation). 1998. Sustainable agricultural production. Implications of international agricultural research. FAO Res. Technol. Paper No. 4, FAO, Rome, Italy. p. 31.
  34. FAO 2011. The state of food security in the world. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy. p. 43.
  35. Government of India. 1997. Report on land and livestock holdings. National Sample Survey Organisation, Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation, New Delhi, India. (Mimeograph)
  36. Hanumanth Rao, C. H. 1994. Agricultural growth and rural poverty in India: emerging trends and perspectives. Indian Econ. Rev. 28:129-140.
  37. IASSD 2008. International Assessment on Agricultural Knowledge, Science and Technology for Development, United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), Nairobi, Kenya http://agassessment.watch.org/
  38. Kohler-Rollefson, I. and K. Kishore. 2010. Shaping policies to support socially and ecologically sustainable livestock development in India's rain-fed areas. Rain-fed Livestock Network, Anand, Gujarat, India. p. 32.
  39. Lin, J. Y. 1998. Cited by M. W. Rosegrant and P. B. R. Hazell. 2000. Transforming the rural Asian economy: the unfinished revolution, Asian Development Bank, Manila, Philippines. 1:64.
  40. Mahadevan, P. and C. Devendra. 1986. Present and projected ruminant production systems. South East Asia and the South Pacific, In: Forages in South East Asia and the Pacific. ACIAR Proc. No. 12:1-6.
  41. MEA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment). 2005. Current State and trends (Ed. R. Hassan, R. Scholes and N. Ash). 1:133-134. https://doi.org/10.5367/000000009789396766
  42. Misra, A. K., C. A. Rama Rao, K. V. Saubramanyam and Y. S. Ramakrishna. 2009. Improving dairy production in India's ranfed agroecosystem: constraints and strategies. Outlook Agric. 38:284-292. https://doi.org/10.5367/000000009789396766
  43. Mudgal, V. D. and K. Pradhan. 1988. Animal feed resources and current patterns of utilisation in India. In: Proc. non-conventional feed resources and fibrous crop residues in India (Ed. C. Devendra). International Development Research Centre, Ottawa, Canada. p. 139.
  44. Nagayets, O. 2005. Small farms: current status and key trends. Proc. The Future of Small Farms. International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC, USA. p. 355.
  45. OECD-FAO. 2010. Agricultural outlook 2010-2019.Highlights, Organisation for Economic Co- operation and Development, Paris, France, and the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations, Rome, Italy.
  46. Pardey, P. G. and N. W. Beintema. 2001. Slow magic. Agricultural R and D: a century after Mendel, International Food Policy Research Institute Food Policy Report, Washington DC, USA. p. 22. https://doi.org/10.5367/000000008787167763
  47. Qiu, H., F. Zhang, W. Zhu, H. Wang and X. Cheng. 2008. Reorientation of China's agriculture over the next two decades. Outlook Agric. 37:247-254. https://doi.org/10.5367/000000008787167763
  48. Raghavan, G. V., N. Krishna and M. R. Reddy. 1995. Priorities for feed resources use in the semi-arid Tropics`. In: Global agenda for livestock research. Proc. of the Consultation for South Asia region (Ed. C. Devendra and P. Gardiner). Patancheru, India, International Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya, p. 37.
  49. Ramachandra, K. S., V. K. Taneja, K. T. Sampath, S. Anandan and U. B. Angadi. 2007. Livestock feed resources in different agro ecological zones of India: availability, requirement and their management. National Institute of Animal Nutrition and Physiology, Bangalore, India. p. 100. https://doi.org/10.5367/000000009789396810
  50. Rivera, W. M. and V. R. Sulaiman. 2009. Extension: object of reform, engine for innovation. Outlook Agric. 38:267-274. https://doi.org/10.5367/000000009789396810
  51. Shrestha, H. R. and D. R. Pradhan. 1995. Research priorities for animal agriculture by agro-ecological zones in Nepal. In: Global agenda for livestock research. Proc. of the Consultation for South Asia region (Ed. C. Devendra and P. Gardiner). Patancheru, India, International Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya, p. 85.
  52. Singh, H. P., K. D. Sharma, G. S. Reddy and K. L. Sharma. 2004. Dryland agriculture in India. In: Challenges and Strategies for Dryland Agriculture, Special Publ. No. 32, CSSA, Madison, USA. p. 16. https://doi.org/10.5367/000000009787762743
  53. Shankar, R. and P. Maraty. 2009. Concerns of India's farmers. Outlook Agric. 38:96-100. https://doi.org/10.5367/000000009787762743
  54. Shukla, R. K. and S. D. Brahmankar. 1999. Impact evaluation of operation flood in rural dairy sector, National Council of Applied Economic Research, New Delhi, India. p. 58.
  55. TAC (Technical Advisory Committee). 1992. Review of CGIAR of Prioritd Strategies. Part 1, TAC Secretariat, FAO, Rome, Italy. p. 250.
  56. TAC (Technical Advisory Committee). 1994. Review of CGIAR of Priorities and Strategies. Part 1, TAC Secretariat, FAO, Rome, Italy. p. 229.
  57. Thornton, P. K., J. van der Steeg, A. Notenbart and M. Herrero. 2009. The impacts of climate change on livestock and livestock systems in developing countries: A review of what we know and what we need to know. Agric. Syst. 103:113-127.
  58. UNDP (United Nations Development Programme). 1996. Urban agriculture, food, jobs and sustainable cities. Publication series for Habitat 11, United Nations Development Programme, New York, USA.
  59. World Bank. 2003. Reaching the poor. A renewal strategy for rural development. Washington, DC, USA. (Mimeograph).
  60. World Bank. 2009. The state of food security in the world, Washington, DC, USA. p. 56.

피인용 문헌

  1. Is Rainwater Harvesting an Option for Designing Sustainable Cropping Patterns for Rainfed Agriculture? vol.27, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.2464
  2. Urbanization, livestock systems and food security in developing countries: A systematic review of the literature vol.11, pp.2, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-019-00906-1
  3. Changing the perception of smallholder farmers about cactus pear in Pakistan vol.1247, pp.None, 2019, https://doi.org/10.17660/actahortic.2019.1247.18
  4. Effect of organic amendments on maize cultivation under agricultural drought conditions in Central Java, Indonesia vol.14, pp.4, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3178/hrl.14.150
  5. Rainfall anomalies and their impacts on Bhutan’s agro-ecological landscape vol.21, pp.4, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-021-01851-6
  6. A statistical evaluation of Earth-observation-based composite drought indices for a localized assessment of agricultural drought in Pakistan vol.106, pp.None, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2021.102646