DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An Enhanced Two-Phase Fuzzy Programming Model for Multi-Objective Supplier Selection Problem

  • Fatrias, Dicky (Department of Electronic and Information Engineering, Toyohashi University of Technology) ;
  • Shimizu, Yoshiaki (Department of Electronic and Information Engineering, Toyohashi University of Technology)
  • 투고 : 2011.11.23
  • 심사 : 2012.02.13
  • 발행 : 2012.03.01

초록

Supplier selection is an essential task within the purchasing function of supply chain management because it provides companies with opportunities to reduce various costs and realize stable and reliable production. However, many companies find it difficult to determine which suppliers should be targeted as each of them has varying strengths and weaknesses in performance which require careful screening by the purchaser. Moreover, information required to assess suppliers is not known precisely and typically fuzzy in nature. In this paper, therefore, fuzzy multi-objective linear programming (fuzzy MOLP) is presented under fuzzy goals: cost minimization, service level maximization and purchasing risk. To solve the problem, we introduce an enhanced two-phase approach of fuzzy linear programming for the supplier selection. In formulated problem, Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) is used to determine the weights of criteria, and Taguchi Loss Function is employed to quantify purchasing risk. Finally, we provide a set of alternative solution which enables decision maker (DM) to select the best compromise solution based on his/her preference. Numerical experiment is provided to demonstrate our approach.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Aliev, R. A., Fazlollahi, B., Guirimov B. G., and Aliev, R. R. (2007), Fuzzy-genetic approach to aggregate production-distribution planning in supply chain management, The Int. J. Information Science, 177, 4241-4255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2007.04.012
  2. Weber, C. A., Current, J. R., and Benton, W. C. (1991), Vendor selection criteria and methods, European Journal of Operation Research, 50, 2-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(91)90033-R
  3. Weber, C. A. and Current, J. R. (1993), A multi-objective approach to vendor selection, European Journal of Operation Research, 68, 173-184. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(93)90301-3
  4. Weber, C. A., Current, J. R., and Desai A. (1998), Noncooperative negotiation strategies for vendor selection, European Journal of Operation Research, 108, 228-223.
  5. Dahel, N. E. (2003), Vendor selection and order quantity allocation in volume discount environment, Supply Chain Management, 8(4), 335-342. https://doi.org/10.1108/13598540310490099
  6. Xia, W. and Wu, Z. (2005), Supplier selection with multiple criteria in volume discount environments, The Int. J. management Science, 35, 494-504.
  7. Kokangul, A. and Susuz, Z. (2009), Integrated analytical hierarchy process, Applied mathematical Modeling, 33, 1417-1429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2008.01.021
  8. Chamodrakaz, I., Batis, D., and Martakos, D. (2009), Supplier selection in electronic marketplaces using satisfying fuzzy AHP, Expert Systems with Applications, 37, 490-498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2009.05.043
  9. Eroll, I. and Farell, W. G. (2003), A methodology for selection problem with multiple, conflicting objectives and both qualitative and quantitative criteria, Int. J. Production Economics, 86, 187-199. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5273(03)00049-5
  10. Kumar, M., Vrat P., and Shankar, R. (2006), A fuzzy programming approach for vendor selection problem in a supply chain, Int. J. Production Economics, 101, 273-285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2005.01.005
  11. Amid, A., Ghodsypour, S. H., and O'Brien, C. (2006), Fuzzy multiobjective linear model for supplier selection in a supply chain, Int. J. Production Economics, 104, 394-407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2005.04.012
  12. Kagnicuoglu, C. H. (2010), A fuzzy multi-objective programming approach for supplier selection in a supply chain, The Bussiness Review, Cambridge, 6 (1), 107-115.
  13. Amid, A., Ghodsypour, S. H., and O'Brien, C. (2011), A weighted max-min model for fuzzy multi-objective supplier selection nin a supply, Int. J. Production Economics, 131, 139-145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2010.04.044
  14. Yucel, A. and Guneri, A. F. (2011), A weighted additive fuzzy programming approach for multi-criteria supplier selection, Expert Systems with Applications, 38, 6281-6286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2010.11.086
  15. Li, X.-Q., Zhang, B., and Li, H. (2005), Computing efficient solutions to fuzzy multiple objective linear programming problem, Fuzzy sets and systems, 157, 1328-1332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fss.2005.12.003
  16. Wu, Y.-K. and Guu, S.-M. (2001), A compromise model for solving fuzzy multiple objective linear programming problems, J. Chinese Inst. Ind. Eng., 18 (5), 87-93.
  17. Kethley, R. B., Waller, B. D., and Festervand, T. A. (2002), Improving customer service in the real estate industry: a property selection model using Taguchi loss functions, Total Qual Management, 13 (6), 739-748. https://doi.org/10.1080/0954412022000010109
  18. Pi, W. N. and Low, C. (2006), Supplier evaluation and selection via Taguchi loss functions and an AHP, Int J. Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 27, 625-630. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-004-2227-z
  19. Saaty, T. L. (1980), The Analytic Hierarchy Process, New York: McGraw-Hill.
  20. Lee, A. H. I. (2009), A fuzzy supplier selection model with the consideration of benefits, opportunities, costs and risks, Expert Systems with Applications, 36(2), 2879-2893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2008.01.045
  21. Lai, Y. J. and Hwang, C. L. (1994), Fuzzy multiple objective decision making, methods and applications, Springer-verlag.
  22. Zimmermann, H. J. (1978), Fuzzy programming and linear programming with several objective functions, Fuzzy sets and systems, 1, 45-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(78)90031-3
  23. Bellman, R. E. and Zadeh, L. A. (1970), Decision making in a fuzzy environment, Management science, 1, B141-B164.

피인용 문헌

  1. The Research on Mutil-Objective Location Routing Problem Based on Genetic Simulated Annealing Algorithm vol.543-547, pp.1662-7482, 2014, https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.543-547.2842