DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

산림경영인증의 사회·경제적 효과 분석: 제주시험림의 사례

Social and Economic Effects of Forest Management Certification: a Case of Jeju Experimental Forest

  • 이성연 (국립산림과학원 산림경제경영과) ;
  • 이호상 (국립산림과학원 산림경제경영과) ;
  • 정영교 (국립산림과학원 기후변화연구센터) ;
  • 주린원 (국립산림과학원 산림경제경영과)
  • Lee, Seong Youn (Division of Forest Economics & Management, Korea Forest Research Institute) ;
  • Lee, Ho Sang (Division of Forest Economics & Management, Korea Forest Research Institute) ;
  • Chung, Young Gyo (Division of Forest & Climate Change, Korea Forest Research Institute) ;
  • Joo, Rin Won (Division of Forest Economics & Management, Korea Forest Research Institute)
  • 투고 : 2012.05.02
  • 심사 : 2012.07.26
  • 발행 : 2012.11.30

초록

The purposes of the research in related to FSC in JuJe experimental forests (JJEFs) is to make pre and post socio-economic comparisons and play an important role of FSC, and recognition change to FSC timbers and to make an analysis to consumers' needs. As the results of onsite survey in 2005, respondents show a high awareness of SFM and FSC in comparisons of 2004, and the JJEFs play a critical role to make SFM and FSC advertisement worldwide, such as consumers' satisfaction to SFM and FSC is high. Hence provision of JJEF information such as job creation and socio-economic impacts to stockholders could make their satisfaction improving. Most of respondents to the FSC of JJEF represent a positive rate while low awareness to FSC timber is represented. Therefore, necessary information about JJEF FSC with forest management, process and consumption pattern of FSC is required into citizens. The final results prove that FSC effects such as 1.3 billion won direct additional benefits in terms of socio-economic aspects including environmental benefits and job creation and economic effects are enough to offset 1.3 billion won additional costs.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Cha JH. 2003. Stake-holders Perceptions on Forest Certification with a Special Reference to Forest Owners, Wood Products Manufacturers and Consumers. Master's thesis. Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
  2. Ebeling J, Yasue M. 2009. The Effectiveness of Market-Based Conservation in the Tropics: Forest Certification in Ecuador and Bolivia. J Environ Manage 90: 1145-1153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.05.003
  3. Joo RW, Lee SY. 2000. The Potential Impacts of Recent Developments in Timber Certification Schemes on the Korean Forest Products Trade. J Korean For Soc 89: 368-377. (in Korean with English abstract)
  4. Korea Forest Service. 2001. Basic Act for Forest.
  5. Overdevest C, Rickenbach MG. 2006. Forest Certification and Institutional Governance: An Empirical Study of Forest Stewardship Council Certificate Holders in the United States. Forest Policy and Economics 9: 93-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2005.03.014
  6. Owari T, Juslin H, Rummukainen A, Tetsuhiko Y. 2006. Strategies, Functions and Benefits of Forest Certification in Wood Products Marketing: Perspectives of Finnish Suppliers. Forest Policy and Economics 9: 380-391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2005.10.005
  7. Rickenbach M. 2002. Forest Certification of Small Ownerships: Some Practical Challenges. Journal of Forestry 100: 43-47.
  8. Vlosky RP, Ozanne LK. 1998. Environmental Certification of Wood Products: the US Manufacturers' Perspective. Forest Products Journal 48: 21-26.
  9. Yoon KB. 2007. A study on the Forest Certification for Sustainable Forest Management (SFM) Korean Forest Economics Society 15: 35-48. (in Korean with English abstract)