DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Effect of Allocation to Third Parties in Increase of Capital on Stock Price of KOSDAQ Firms

코스닥기업의 제3자 배정 증자가 주가에 미치는 영향

  • Cho, Sang-Kwon (Department of Business Administration, Paichai University) ;
  • Kang, Ho-Jung (Department of Business Administration, Paichai University)
  • Received : 2012.01.12
  • Accepted : 2012.04.12
  • Published : 2012.04.30

Abstract

The allocation to third parties in increase of capital is increasing in KOSDAQ firms. With this trend, they cause many problems which involves stock price manipulation. Under this condition, this study analyzes stock price reaction by event study to 197 cases of 81 KOSDAQ companies that allocated to third parties in increase of capital between the year of 2007 and 2009. And we find determinants of cumulative abnormal return by using multiple regression. Results of this research are as follows. First, in case of excess return of (-5, +5), it reveals positive excess return significantly at 1% significance level during 4 days before payment day(event day). But it reveals negative excess return significantly at 1% significance level during 5 days after payment day. Second, in case of excess return of (-40, +40), it reveals positive excess return significantly at 1% significance level during 40 days before payment day(event day). But it reveals negative excess return significantly at 1% significance level during 40 days after payment day. Third, in case of excess return of (0, 1 year), it reveals negative excess return significantly at 1% significance level during 1 year after payment day. Fourth, significant determinant of cumulative abnormal return to (-5, +5) was firm size with positive effect. Significant determinants of cumulative abnormal return to (-40, +40) were reserve ratio and debt ratio. Reserve ratio has positive effect But debt ratio has negative effect. Significant determinants of cumulative abnormal return to (0, 1 year) were firm size, debt ratio, reserve ratio. equity ratio to large shareholder. Firm size, debt ratio, equity ratio to large shareholder have negative effect. But reserve ratio has positive effect.

본 연구는 2007년 1월부터 2009년 12월까지 3년간 코스닥기업의 유상증자 형태 중 제3자 배정을 통해 대금을 납입한 81개 기업 197건에 대하여 사건연구를 통해 납입 전, 후의 주가반응을 비교분석하였고, 더 나아가 누적초과수익률에 영향을 미치는 요인이 무엇인지를 다중회귀분석을 통해 파악하였다 본 연구의 결과를 요약하면 다음과 같다. 첫째, (-5, +5) 초과수익률은 납입일 5일전부터 1일전까지 1% 수준에서 유의적인 정(+)의 초과수익률을 보이는 것으로 나타났고, 사건일인 납입 일에는 유의적인 초과수익률이 존재하지 않는 것으로 나타났다. 납입일 이후 5일 동안은 1% 유의수준에서 부(-)의 초과수익률을 보였다. 둘째, 납입일 전, 후 40일간(-40, +40)의 초과수익률은 납입일 전 40일 동안 1% 수준에서 유의적인 정(+)의 초과수익률을 나타냈으며, 납입일 이후 40일 동안 1% 수준에서 유의적인 부(-)의 초과수익률을 보였다. 셋째, 납입일 이후 1년간(0, 1년)의 초과수익률은 1% 수준에서 유의적인 부(-)의 초과수익률을 보였다. 넷째, (-5, +5)까지의 누적초과수익률에 영향을 미치는 요인은 기업규모로 정(+)의 영향을 미쳤으며, 10% 유의수준에서 유의적이었다. 유보율과 부채비율은 (-40, +40)의 누적초과수익률에 10% 유의수준에서 유의적으로 각각 정(+)과 부(-)의 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. (0, 1년)의 누적초과수익률에 영향을 미치는 요인은 기업규모, 부채비율, 대주주지분율은 각각 1%, 5%, 10% 유의수준에서 유의적인 부(-)의 영향을, 유보율은 1% 유의수준에서 유의적으로 정(+)의 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다.

Keywords

References

  1. Asquith, P. and D. Mullins,"Equity issuance and offering dilution", Journal of financial economics 15, pp. 61-89, 1986. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(86)90050-4
  2. Cho Junhee," A study announcement effects of seasoned equity offerings on the KOSDAQ, Social science research, vol.19, pp.95-114, 2008.
  3. Chung Hyunchul, Jeong youngwoo," Seasoned equity offering announcement and market efficiency, The Korean journal of financial management, vol.25, No.3, pp.79-109, 2008.
  4. Gajewski and Ginglinger,"Seasoned equity issues in a closely held market:Evidence from France, European finance review, vol.6, pp.291-319, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022024925877
  5. Hur Namsoo, Jeong Jinho, Kim Hioh," A study on the effect on firm value of seasoned equity offering to venture companies" venture business research, vol.6, No.3, pp.91-115, 2003.
  6. Jang Jiyoung, Lee Hyejin, Hwang Sunghyun," The effects of seasoned equiry offering methods on firm characteristics and stock market reactions: Shareholder priority public offering and allotment to the third party", Korean business education research, vol.59, pp.83-105, 2010.
  7. Jang Youngkwang, Kim Inho,"A study on the determinants of choice for type of seasoned equity offering", Proceeding of Korean securities association, 2010.
  8. Mikkelson, Partch."Valuation effects of security offerings and the issuance process",Journal of financial economics, vol.15, pp.31-60, 1986. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(86)90049-8
  9. Park Sangsoo, Lee Dongheon," Recent changes in the announcement effect of seasoned equity offering in Korea", Proceeding of Korean securities association, 2010.
  10. Shin Yeonsoo," An empirrical study of trading trait and market efficiency, The journal of business education, vol.5, pp.157-178, 2006.
  11. Slovin et al,"Alternative flotation methods, adverse selection, and ownership structure: Evidence from seasoned equity issuance in the UK,,Journal of financial economics, vol.57, pp.157-190, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(00)00054-4
  12. Yoon Pyungsig," Short-term and long term effect of seasoned equity offerinfs, Korean journal of financial studies, vol.25, No.1, pp.71-105, 1999.
  13. http://www.fss.or.kr