Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society (한국산학기술학회논문지)

The Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society (한국산학기술학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Research on University Students' Recognition of Recreation

대학생들의 레크리에이션에 관한 인식 조사

  • Song, Dea-Jin (Division of Sports Science, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Son, Jeoung-A (Division of Sports Science, Chungnam National University)
  • 송대진 (충남대학교 스포츠과학과) ;
  • 손정아 (충남대학교 스포츠과학과)
  • Received : 2012.04.02
  • Accepted : 2012.05.10
  • Published : 2012.05.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study speculates on the Korea's current recreation activity via surveys on students' recognition of recreation activity. For the research, the number of 200 university students (subjects) in D metropolitan city who had attended a recreation class or program was collected as a population, among which the data of 188 subjects were used for the real analysis. The collected data were analyzed through 'Frequency Anaalysis' and 'Chi-square Test' using SPSS Ver. 12.0. First, 'gender' was not significant in the area of students' recognitional difference according to their personal data (gender, department); on the other hand, a slight difference was found in 'department'; but in general, the recreation activity was regarded as a sort of entertainment in which people gather and have fun together, and it was thought to be involved in leisure. Second, the recreational activity in students' minds was presented into school MT, orientation, athletic meeting, camping, etc. The results demonstrate that the concept of recreation in our country became considerably reduced compared to its original meaning, and a recreation leader's authority came to be also low-valued.

본 연구는 대학생들의 레크리에이션 인식에 대한 조사로 D광역시 대학교에 재학 중인 학생 188명을 대상으로 레크리에이션 수업(강습)을 참여한 그룹과 그렇지 않은 그룹을 설문하여 SPSS 12.0 통계분석프로그램을 이용하여 빈도분석과 카이제곱검정을 실시한 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 성별은 수업(강습) 경험과 유의하지 않으나 계열은 유의한 결과가 나왔고, 레크리에이션 인식은 수업(강습) 유무와 상관없이 오락이라 하였다. 여가와 레크리에이션 관계는 여가에 레크리에이션이 포함된다고 답하였다. 둘째, 대학생들의 레크리에이션 활동에 대한 인식으로 대학MT나 OT, 축제, 체육대회, 수련회 등과 같은 내용을 레크리에이션 활동이라고 기재하였으며, 프로그램의 일부라고 생각하는 대학생도 있는 것으로 나타났다. 셋째, 레크리에이션 지도자에 관해서는 결과는 진행자나 사회자라는 칭호를 선호하는 것으로 조사되었다. 본 연구 결과는 우리나라에서 레크리에이션의 개념은 예년에 비해 이해도가 높아졌으나 아직까지도 협소한 내용으로 인지되고 있어 보다 적극적인 교과 내용 개발과 지도자 양성이 필요하다.

Keywords

References

  1. Gang G. I, Students recognize the leisure and recreation Study of Utilization. Kyung Hee University, Master's Thesis, 1991.
  2. Kim G. J, Leisure and recreation development of leadership qualities scale. Leisure, recreation studies, 11, 1994.
  3. Kim O. J, Recreation and education in Korea. Monthly Physical Education, 27 (1), 1968.
  4. Kim O. J, General Studies leisure and recreation. Publishing daegyeongbukseu, 23, 2000.
  5. Kim J. H, Han J. M, Lee Y. S, Status and leisure activities whether college students study. Korea Leisure Recreation Society, 27, 203-221, 2004.
  6. Bak D. H, Female college students leading the study for the analysis of recreation. Sang Myung University Student Life Research Institute, 1984
  7. Son J. A, Leisure, recreation guides. Chungnam National University Press, 2009.
  8. Sim S. S, Yu G. J, Recreational classes of college students recognized and Class Satisfaction Study. Curriculum and Instruction Education and Research Institute Dankook University curriculum, Issue 5, 2001.
  9. Yun S. M, Kim Y. K, Students participate in recreational activities and the relationship between social support. Korea Sports Research 15 (3), 2004.
  10. Lee J. G, Modern social and recreational. Bogyeong Seoul Press, 40, 1987.
  11. Jon Y. S, A study on the structure of consciousness Recreation. Kyonggi University Graduate School of Management Master Thesis, 1992.
  12. Jung H. S, Students of the leisure and recreation activities on life satisfaction study on the effect Korea Sports Research 16 (5), 2005.
  13. Jo B. G, A study of college students in leisure activities. School of Physical Education Master's Thesis, University of Suwon, 1998.
  14. Hong S. P, What type of leisure activity and leisure in the study of the relationship. MS Thesis, Seoul National University, 1991.
  15. Arnold, S, The dilemma of meaning. In T. L. Goodale, & P. A. Witt(Ed.), Recreation and leisure : Issues in an era of change(pp. 5-20). State College, PA : Venture Publishing, 1991.
  16. Corbin., D, Recreation leadership. 3rd Edition, Prentice-Hall, Inc. 1970.
  17. Davis, K, Human Relation at Work. N.Y., McGraw-Hill Book Co. 1967.
  18. Kraus, R, Recreation today, recreation planning and leadership. Goodyear pub, Co. 1981.
  19. Phiffner, J. M. & Prethus, R. V, Public Receation. N.Y. The Ronald Press Company, 1964.
  20. Webster Dictionary. http://www.m-w.com/
  21. Zensen, C. R, Administrative Management of Physical Education and Atheletic Programs. Philadelphia, Lea & Febiger, 1983.