대한건축학회논문집:계획계 (Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Planning & Design)

  • 제28권6호
  • /
  • Pages.219-226
  • /
  • 2012
  • /
  • 1226-9093(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2384-177X(eISSN)
대한건축학회 (Architectural Institute of Korea)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

주거환경만족도와 커뮤니티 의식이 도시 거주자의 이주의사에 미치는 영향 - 광주광역시를 중심으로 -

Effects of Residential Satisfaction and the Sense of Community on Residential Mobility Decision of Urban Residents - Focused on Gwangju Metropolitan City -

  • 김영주 (중앙대학교 예술대학 주거환경학과) ;
  • 유병선 (연세대학교 사회복지연구소)
  • 투고 : 2012.02.10
  • 발행 : 2012.06.25
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

The purpose of this study is to identify determinants which have influence on residential mobility decision. In the study, residential satisfaction and residents' sense of community (satisfaction with resident participation activity, engagement in resident participation activity and interest in living town), other socio-demographic(gender, age, household type, educational level, job, household income) and housing variables(housing type, housing ownership, the length of residence) are used as explanatory variables in a casual model. 601 subjects from Gwangju Metropolitan City were selected as the final sample. The data was collected from March 31, 2010 to April 15, 2010. A statistical analysis is carried out by applying binominal logit model. SPSS 18.0 program was used for the analysis. Analysis shows that variables reflecting education level(more educated people), job(public official) housing type(apartment) are significantly related with the level of residential mobility decision. And residential satisfaction is significantly associated with residential mobility decision, even after controlling individual's socio-demographic characteristics. There are no differences among satisfaction with resident participation activity and engagement in residential participation activity, whereas there is significant difference between interest in living town and residential mobility decision. From the result, good quality in residential environment make it easier for residents to settle their neighborhood and creating practical residents participation activity should be made to improve residence stability.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 계기석․천현숙, 커뮤니티 중심의 주거환경정비 연구, 국토연구원, 2000
  2. 고경필, 주거이동의 동기와 영향요인 분석, 한국주거학회지, 10(1), 85-95, 1999
  3. 곽현근, 동네관련 사회자본의 영향요인에 관한 연구, 한국사회와 행정연구, 14(3), 259-285, 2003
  4. 김근용 외, 2008년도 주거실태조사 연구보고서, 국토해양부.국토연구원, 2009
  5. 신나윤, 도시가구의 고용특성 및 변화에 따른 주거이동에 관한 연구-수도권을 중심으로, 서울대학교 환경대학원 석사학위논문, 2006
  6. 이경환, 지역 주민들의 사회적 관계가 주거이동 결정에 미치는 영향-서울시 12개 행정동을 대상으로, 국토계획, 43(5), 23-33, 2008
  7. 장욱, 김경수, 부산 인접도시 택지개발지의 가구이동 결정요인 분석, 국토계획, 36(2), 45-55, 2001
  8. 조성희 외, 공동주택 주거문화 제고방안 연구, 건설교통부.한국주거학회, 2007
  9. 최열, 도시내 주거이동 결정요인과 희망주거지역 분석, 국토계획, 34(5), 19-30, 1999
  10. 통계청, 국내이동인구통계(www.kosis.kr), 2012
  11. Baumeister, R. F., How the self became a problem: A psychological review of historical research, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 163-176, 1987 https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.1.163
  12. Clark, W. A. V. & Onaka, J. L., Life cycle and housing adjustment as explanations of residential mobility, Urban Studied, 20, 47-57, 1983 https://doi.org/10.1080/713703176
  13. Clark, W. A. V., Deurloo, M. C. & Dieleman, F. M., Housing consumption and residential mobility, Annuals of the Association of American Geographers, 74(1), 29-43, 1984 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.1984.tb01432.x
  14. Clark, W. A. V., Recent Research on Migration and Mobility: A retire and interpretation, Progress in Planning, 18, 1-56, 1982 https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-9006(82)90002-2
  15. Cotter, A., Meyer, J., & Roberts, S., Humanity or bureaucracy? The transition from hospital to long-term continuing institutional care, NT Research, 3(4), 247-256, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1177/174498719800300403
  16. Dieleman, F. M., Modeling residential mobility: A review of recent trends in research, Journal of Housing and Built Environment, 16, 249-265, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012515709292
  17. Farrell, S. J., Auby, T. & Coulombe, D., Neighborhoods and neighbors: do they contribute to personal well-being? Journal of Community Psychology, 32, 9-25, 2004 https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.10082
  18. Gilleard, C., Hyde, M. & Higgs, P., The impact of age place, aging in place, and attachment to place on the well-being of the over 50s in England, Research on Aging, 29(6), 590-605, 2007 https://doi.org/10.1177/0164027507305730
  19. Greenfield, P.M., Linking social change and developmental change: Shifting pathways of human development, Developmental Psychology, 45(2), 401-418, 2009 https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014726
  20. Loo, C. & Mar, D., Desired residential mobility in a low income ethnic community: A case study of Chinatown, Journal of Social Issues, 38(3), 95-105, 1982 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1982.tb01772.x
  21. Low, S. M., & Altman, I., Place attachment: A conceptual inquiry, In I. Altman, S. M. Low, (Eds), Place Attachment(pp.1-12), N. Y.: Plenum Press, 1992
  22. Mulvey, S.E. & Swanson, J.W., Neighborhood structural characteristics and mental disorders: Faris and Dunham revisited, Social Science & Medicine, 55, 1457-1470, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(01)00266-0
  23. Oishi, S., The psychology of residential mobility: Implications for the self, social relationships and well-being, Perspective on Psychological Science, 5(1), 5-21, 2010 https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691609356781
  24. Rossi, P. H., Why Families Move: A study in the social psychology of urban residential mobility, Glencoe: Free Press. IL, 1955
  25. Scopelliti, M., & Tiberio, L., Homesickness in university students: the role of multiple place attachment, Environment and Behavior, 42(3), 335-350, 2010 https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916510361872
  26. Tognoli, J. ,Leaving home: Homesickness, place attachment, and transition among residence students, Journal of College Student Psychotherapy, 18, 35-48, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1300/J035v18n01_04