Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention

  • 제13권5호
  • /
  • Pages.2031-2037
  • /
  • 2012
  • /
  • 1513-7368(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2476-762X(eISSN)
아시아태평양암예방학회 (Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Application of Crossover Analysis-logistic Regression in the Assessment of Gene- environmental Interactions for Colorectal Cancer

  • Wu, Ya-Zhou (Department of Health Statistics, Third Military Medical University) ;
  • Yang, Huan (Department of Hygienic Toxicology, Third Military Medical University) ;
  • Zhang, Ling (Department of Health Education & Medical Humanities, Third Military Medical University) ;
  • Zhang, Yan-Qi (Department of Health Statistics, Third Military Medical University) ;
  • Liu, Ling (Department of Health Statistics, Third Military Medical University) ;
  • Yi, Dong (Department of Health Statistics, Third Military Medical University) ;
  • Cao, Jia (Department of Hygienic Toxicology, Third Military Medical University)
  • 발행 : 2012.05.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Background: Analysis of gene-gene and gene-environment interactions for complex multifactorial human disease faces challenges regarding statistical methodology. One major difficulty is partly due to the limitations of parametric-statistical methods for detection of gene effects that are dependent solely or partially on interactions with other genes or environmental exposures. Based on our previous case-control study in Chongqing of China, we have found increased risk of colorectal cancer exists in individuals carrying a novel homozygous TT at locus rs1329149 and known homozygous AA at locus rs671. Methods: In this study, we proposed statistical method-crossover analysis in combination with logistic regression model, to further analyze our data and focus on assessing gene-environmental interactions for colorectal cancer. Results: The results of the crossover analysis showed that there are possible multiplicative interactions between loci rs671 and rs1329149 with alcohol consumption. Multifactorial logistic regression analysis also validated that loci rs671 and rs1329149 both exhibited a multiplicative interaction with alcohol consumption. Moreover, we also found additive interactions between any pair of two factors (among the four risk factors: gene loci rs671, rs1329149, age and alcohol consumption) through the crossover analysis, which was not evident on logistic regression. Conclusions: In conclusion, the method based on crossover analysis-logistic regression is successful in assessing additive and multiplicative gene-environment interactions, and in revealing synergistic effects of gene loci rs671 and rs1329149 with alcohol consumption in the pathogenesis and development of colorectal cancer.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Arafa MA, Waly MI, Jriesat S, et al (2011). Dietary and lifestyle characteristics of colorectal cancer in Jordan: a case-control study. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 12, 1931-6.
  2. Chatterjee N, Kalaylioglu Z, Moslehi R, Peters U, et al (2006). Powerful multilocus tests of genetic association in the presence of gene-gene and gene-environment interactions. Am J Hum Genet, 79, 1002-16. https://doi.org/10.1086/509704
  3. Darbary HK, Dutt SS, Sait SJ, et al (2009). Uniparentalism in sporadic colorectal cancer is independent of imprint status, and coordinate for chromosomes 14 and 18. Cancer Genet Cytogenet, 189, 77-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cancergencyto.2008.10.011
  4. Elbers CC, van Eijk KR, Franke L, et al (2009). Using genomewide pathway analysis to unravel the etiology of complex diseases. Genet Epidemiol, 33, 419-31. https://doi.org/10.1002/gepi.20395
  5. Gao Y, Cao Y, Tan A, et al (2010). Glutathione S-transferase M1 polymorphism and sporadic colorectal cancer risk: An updating meta-analysis and HuGE review of 36 case-control studies. Ann Epidemiol, 20, 108-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annepidem.2009.10.003
  6. Garcia-Martinez C, Lozano M, Herrera F, et al (2008). Global and local real-coded genetic algorithms based on parentcentric crossover operators. Eur J Oper Res, 185, 1088-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2006.06.043
  7. Günther F, Wawro N, Bammann K (2009). Neural networks for modeling gene-gene interactions in association studies. BMC Genet, 10:87.
  8. Hahn LW, Ritchie MD, Moore JH (2003). Multifactor dimensionality reduction software for detecting gene-gene and gene-environment interactions. Bioinformatics, 19, 376-82. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btf869
  9. Hallqvist J, Ahlbom A, Diderichsen F, et al (1996). How to evaluate interaction between causes a review of practices in cardiovascular epidemiology. J Intern Med, 239, 377-82. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2796.1996.431782000.x
  10. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S (1990). Applied logistic regression [M]. London: John Wiley&Sons. 1-23.
  11. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S (1992). Confidence interval estimation of interaction. Epidemiology, 3, 452-6. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001648-199209000-00012
  12. Kooperberg C, Ruczinski I (2005). Identifying interacting SNPs using Monte Carlo logic regression. Genet Epidemiol, 28, 157-70. https://doi.org/10.1002/gepi.20042
  13. Kooperberg C, Ruczinski I, LeBlanc ML, et al (2001). Sequence analysis using logic regression. Genet Epidemiol, 21, 626-31. https://doi.org/10.1002/gepi.2001.21.s1.s626
  14. Liddle Andrew R (2007). Information criteria for astrophysical model selection. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical.
  15. Mitchell HG, Jacques B (2000). Encyclopedia of epidemiologic methods. John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
  16. Moolgavkar SH, Venzon DJ (1987). General relative risk regression models for epidemiologic studies. Am J Epidemiol, 126, 949-61. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114733
  17. Ottman R (1996). Theoretical epidemiology gene-environment interaction: definitions and study designs. Prev Med, 25, 764-70. https://doi.org/10.1006/pmed.1996.0117
  18. Reeves SG, Mossman D, Meldrum CJ, et al (2008). The-149C>T SNP within the DDNMT3B gene, is not associated with early disease onset in hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer. Cancer Lett, 265, 39-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canlet.2008.02.005
  19. Rothman KJ (1986). Interactions between causes. In: Modern epidemiology. Boston: Little, Brown: 311-26.
  20. Rothman KJ (2002). Epidemiology: an introduction [M]. New York: Oxford University Press.
  21. Roukos DH (2009). Genome-wide association studies and aggressive surgery toward individualized prevention, and improved local control and overall survival for gastric cancer. Ann Surg Oncol, 16, 795-98. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-009-0317-8
  22. Ruczinski I, Kooperberg C, LeBlanc M (2003). Logic regression. J Comput Graph Stat, 12, 475-511. https://doi.org/10.1198/1061860032238
  23. Tomlinson I, Webb E, Carvajal-Carmona L, et al (2007). A genome-wide association scan of tag SNPs identifies a susceptibility variant for colorectal cancer at 8q24.21. Nat Genet, 39, 984-8. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng2085
  24. Wong HL, Peters U, Hayes RB, et al (2010). Polymorphisms in the adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) gene and advanced colorectal adenoma risk. Eur J Cancer, 46, 2457-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2010.04.020
  25. Wu X, Jin L, Xiong M (2008). Composite measure of linkage disequilibrium for testing interaction between unlinked loci. Eur J Hum Genet, 16, 644-51. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejhg.5202004
  26. Wu Y, Zhang L, Liu L, et al (2011). A multifactor dimensionality reduction-logistic regression model of gene polymorphisms and an environmental interaction analysis in cancer research. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 12, 2887-92.
  27. Xiong XD, Qiu FE, Fang JH, et al (2009). Association analysis between the Cdc6 G1321A polymorphism and the risk for non-Hodgkin lymphoma and hepatocellular carcinoma. Mutat Res, 662, 10-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2008.11.014
  28. Yang H, Zhou Y, Zhou Z, et al (2009). A novel polymorphism rs1329149 of CYP2E1 and a known polymorphism rs671 of ALDH2 of alcohol metabolizing enzymes are associated with colorectal cancer in a southwestern Chinese population. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, 18, 2522-7. https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-09-0398
  29. Zhao Y, Deng X, Wang Z, et al (2012). Genetic Polymorphisms of DNA Repair Genes XRCC1 and XRCC3 and Risk of Colorectal Cancer in Chinese Population. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 13, 665-9. https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2012.13.2.665

피인용 문헌

  1. Association between the HSPA1B ±1267A/G Polymorphism and Cancer Risk: a Meta-analysis of 14 Case-Control Studies vol.15, pp.16, 2014, https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2014.15.16.6855
  2. Importance of Meta-Analysis and Practical Obstacles in Oncological and Epidemiological Studies: Statistics Very Close but Also Far! vol.16, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2015.16.3.1303
  3. Building Up a Robust Risk Mathematical Platform to Predict Colorectal Cancer vol.2017, pp.1099-0526, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/8917258