DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Value of Ultrasound Elastography in Assessment of Enlarged Cervical Lymph Nodes

  • Teng, Deng-Ke (Department of Ultrasonography, The 208th Hospital of PLA) ;
  • Wang, Hui (Department of Ultrasonography, China-Japan Union Hospital, Jilin University) ;
  • Lin, Yuan-Qiang (Department of Ultrasonography, China-Japan Union Hospital, Jilin University) ;
  • Sui, Guo-Qing (Department of Ultrasonography, China-Japan Union Hospital, Jilin University) ;
  • Guo, Feng (Department of Ultrasonography, China-Japan Union Hospital, Jilin University) ;
  • Sun, Li-Na (Department of Ultrasonography, China-Japan Union Hospital, Jilin University)
  • 발행 : 2012.05.30

초록

Background: To investigate the value of ultrasound elastography (UE) in the differentiation between benign and malignant enlarged cervical lymph nodes (LNs). Methods: B-mode ultrasound, power Doppler imaging and UE were examined to determine LN characteristics. Two kinds of methods, 4 scores of elastographic classification and a strain ratio (SR) were used to evaluate the ultrasound elastograms. Results: The cutoff point of SR had high utility in differential diagnosis of benign and malignant of cervical lymph nodes, with good sensitivity, specificity and accuracy. Conclusion: UE is an important aid in differential diagnosis of benign and malignant cervical LNs.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Ahuja A, Ying M (2002). An overview of neck nodesonography. Invest Radiol, 37, 333-42. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004424-200206000-00005
  2. Alam F, Naito K, Horiguchi J, et al (2008). Accuracy of sonographic elastography in the differential diagnosis of enlarged cervical lymph nodes: comparison with conventional B-mode sonography. Am J Roentgenol, 191, 604-10. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.07.3401
  3. Castelins JA, van den Brekel MW, Mukherji SK, et al (2003). Ultrasound of the neck. In: Som PM, Curtin HD, eds. Head and neck imaging. Boston, MA: Mosby, pp 1935-53.
  4. Fatima S, Arshad S, Ahmed Z, Hasan SH (2011). Spectrum of cytological findings in patients with neck lymphadenopathy-experience in a tertiary care hospital in Pakistan. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 12, 1873-5.
  5. Friedrich-Rust M, Ong MF, Herrmann E, et al (2007). Real--time elastography for noninvasive assessment of liver fibrosis in chronic viral hepatitis. Am J Roentgenol, 188, 758-64. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.06.0322
  6. Furukawa MK, Kubota A, Hanamura H, Furukawa M (2007). Clinical application of real-time tissue elastography to head and neck cancer--evaluation of cervical lymph node metastasis with real-time tissue elastography. Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho. 110, 503-5. https://doi.org/10.3950/jibiinkoka.110.503
  7. Iagnocco A, Kaloudi O, Perella C, et al (2010). Ultrasound elastography assessment of skin involvement in systemic sclerosis: lights and shadows. J Rheumatol, 37, 1688-91. https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.090974
  8. Itoh A, Ueno E, Tohno E, et al (2006). Breast disease: clinical application of US elastography for diagnosis. Radiology, 239, 341-50. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2391041676
  9. Kau RJ, Alexiou C, Stimmer H, et al (2000). Diagnostic procedures for detection of lymph node metastases in cancer of the larynx. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec, 62, 199-203. https://doi.org/10.1159/000027746
  10. Li L, Chen LZ (2012). Factors influencing axillary lymph node metastasis in invasive breast cancer. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 13, 251-4. https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2012.13.1.251
  11. Lyshchik A, Higashi T, Asato R, et al (2005). Thyroid gland tumor diagnosis at US elastography. Radiology, 237, 202-11. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2363041248
  12. Lyshchik A, Higashi T, Asato R, et al (2007). Cervical lymph node metastasis: diagnosis at UE--initial experience. Radiology, 243, 258-67. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2431052032
  13. Senchenkov A, Staren ED (2004). Ultrasound in head and neck surgery: thyroid, parathyroid, and cervical lymph nodes. Surg Clin North Am, 84, 973-1000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suc.2004.04.007
  14. Solbiati L, Cioffi V, Ballarati E (1992). Ultrasonography of the neck. Radiol Clin North Am, 30, 941-54.
  15. Takashima S, Sone S, Nomura N, et al (1997). Nonpalpable lymph nodes of the neck: assessment with US and USguided fineneedle aspiration biopsy. J Clin Ultrasound, 25, 283-92. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0096(199707)25:6<283::AID-JCU1>3.0.CO;2-8
  16. Tan R, Xiao Y, He Q (2010). Ultrasound elastography: Its potential role in assessment of cervical lymphadenopathy. Acad Radiol, 17, 849-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2010.03.014
  17. Taylor LS, Rubens DJ, Porter BC, et al (2005). Prostate cancer: threedimensional sonoelastography for in vitro detection. Radiology, 237, 981-5. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2373041573
  18. Thomas A, Fischer T, Frey H, et al (2006). Realtime elastography: an advanced method of ultrasound-first results in 108 patients with breast lesions. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 28, 335-40. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.2823
  19. Thomas A, Kummel S, Gemeinhardt O, et al (2007). Realtime sonoelastography of the cervix: tissue elasticity of the normal and abnormal cervix. Acad Radiol, 14, 193-200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2006.11.010
  20. Wu CH, Hsu MM, Chang YL, et al (1998). Vascular pathology of malignant cervical lymphadenopathy: qualitative and quantitative assessment with power Doppler ultrasound. Cancer, 83, 1189-96. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19980915)83:6<1189::AID-CNCR19>3.0.CO;2-1

피인용 문헌

  1. Conventional Ultrasonography and Real Time Ultrasound Elastography in the Differential Diagnosis of Degenerating Cystic Thyroid Nodules Mimicking Malignancy and Papillary Thyroid Carcinomas vol.14, pp.2, 2013, https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2013.14.2.935
  2. Real-time ultrasound elastography: an assessment of enlarged cervical lymph nodes vol.23, pp.9, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-013-2861-7
  3. Clinical Value of Real Time Elastography in Patients with Unexplained Cervical Lymphadenopathy: Quantitative Evaluation vol.15, pp.13, 2014, https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2014.15.13.5487
  4. Quantitative Analysis of Enlarged Cervical Lymph Nodes with Ultrasound Elastography vol.16, pp.16, 2015, https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2015.16.16.7291
  5. Comparison of Virtual Touch Tissue Quantification with Strain Ratio in Differentiating Malignant from Benign Cervical Lymph Nodes vol.24, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.2485/jhtb.24.49
  6. Efficiency of B-mode Ultrasound and Strain Elastography in Differentiating Between Benign and Malignant Cervical Lymph Nodes vol.33, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1097/RUQ.0000000000000302
  7. Comparisons between elastographic stiffness scores for benign versus malignant lymph nodes in dogs and cats pp.10588183, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1111/vru.12557
  8. Reliability of sonoelastography in predicting pediatric cervical lymph node malignancy vol.34, pp.8, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-018-4301-x
  9. Strain elastography of tongue carcinoma using intraoral ultrasonography: A preliminary study to characterize normal tissues and lesions vol.48, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.5624/isd.2018.48.1.45