Asian Journal of Innovation and Policy

  • 제2권1호
  • /
  • Pages.1-19
  • /
  • 2013
  • /
  • 2287-1608(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-1616(eISSN)
아시아기술혁신학회 (Asian Society for Innovation and Policy)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Towards an Innovation Policy in the Post Catch-Up Era

  • 투고 : 2013.01.31
  • 심사 : 2013.04.12
  • 발행 : 2013.05.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

As the catch-up innovation system was exposed to a new competition environment in which second-tier catch-up countries reduced the gap with Korea and advanced Korean firms entered into the frontier product market, it is experiencing system delay in terms of organizational and policy change. Therefore, innovation policy needs to be reorganized from a dynamic perspective to analyze the problems in the transition period and enable the system to overcome organizational and institutional delays. This article investigates the characteristics of transition periods in terms of external environment changes and internal socio-economic pressures. Based on the analysis of environment changes and catch-up system characteristics, it suggests the framework for policy intervention, direction, and practical principles for post catch-up innovation policy. In particular, it suggests the network-based developmental state and policy implementation in order to overcome the limitation of centralized developmental state of catch-up periods.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Aoki, M. and Dore, R. (1996) The Japanese Firm: The Sources of Competitive Strength, Oxford University Press.
  2. Bergek, A., Jacobsson S. and Sanden B.A. (2008), 'Legitimation' and 'development of positive externalities': two key processes in the formation phase of technological innovation system', Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, September 2008, 20(5), 575-592. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537320802292768
  3. Block, F. (2008) Swimming against the current: the rise of a hidden developmental state in the United States, Politics & Society, 36(2), 169-206. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329208318731
  4. Chung, J.H. (2012) The possibility and limitation of neo-industrial policy based on network failure, Trend and Prospect, 85, 50-88 (in Korean).
  5. Hausmann, R. and Rodrik, D. (2003) Economic development as self-discovery, Journal of Economic Development, 72(2), 603-633. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3878(03)00124-X
  6. Hong, Y.S. (2012) Modes of combinative innovation case of Samsung electronics, Asian Journal of Innovation Policy, 1(2), 219-239. https://doi.org/10.7545/ajip.2012.1.2.219
  7. Hwang, K.H. (2012) Exploration of new innovation strategies for the post catching-up : co-ordination between learning process and R&D, Korea Technology Innovation Society, Proceeding of Spring Conference 2012 (in Korean).
  8. Hwang, H.R., Choung, J.Y. and Song, W.C. (2012) Post catch-up theory: direction and agenda, Journal of Technology Innovation, 20(1), 75-114 (in Korean).
  9. Khan, M. and Blankenberg, S. (2009) The political economy of industrial policy in Asia and Latin America, Cimoli, M., Dosi, G., Stiglitz, J.E. (eds.), Industrial Policy and Development: The Political Economy of Capabilities Accumulation, Oxford University Press.
  10. KISTEP (2012) Survey of Research and Development in Korea (in Korean).
  11. Korean Intellectual Property Office, (2011) Patent Trend of Korea (in Korean).
  12. Malerba,F. (1998) Public Policy and Industrial Dynamics: An Evolutionary Perspective, ISE Report Project, Systems of Innovation Research Program, Department of Technology and Social Change.
  13. Ministry of Knowledge Economy, www.wcp.or.kr.
  14. Perez, C. (2002) Technological Revolutions and Financial Capital, Edward Elgar.
  15. Perez, C. (2009) The double bubble at the turn of the century: technological root and structural implication, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 33(4), 779-805. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bep028
  16. Porter, M. (1990) The Competitive Aadvantage of Nations, New York: Free Press.
  17. Radosevic, S. (2009) Policies for promoting technological catch up: a post-Washington approach, International Journal of Institutions and Economies, 1(1), 23-52.
  18. Rodrik, D. (2007) One Economics, Many Recipes, Princeton University Press.
  19. Schrank and Whitford (2011) The anatomy of network failure, Sociological Theory, 29(3), 151-177. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9558.2011.01392.x
  20. Sen, A. (2001) Development as Freedom, New York: Random House.
  21. Smith, K. (1998) System Approaches to Innovation: Some Policy Issues, ISE Report Project, Systems of Innovation Research Program, Department of Technology and Social Change.
  22. Song, W.C. (2004) The role and function of government in the national systems of innovation, Policy Issue 2004-1, STEPI (in Korean).
  23. Song,W.C. and Hwang, H.R. (2006) Technological innovation activities of component providers in the era of post catch-up, Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society, 9(3), 435-450 (in Korean).
  24. Song,W.C. et al. (2006) Searching for Post Catch-Up Innovation System, STEPI (in Korean).
  25. Sung, J.E. and Song W.C. (2010) Post catch-up innovation and integral innovation policy, Working Paper 2010-03, STEPI (in Korean).
  26. World Bank (2005) Economic Growth in the 1990s: Learning from a Decade of Reform, Washington DC: World Bank.

피인용 문헌

  1. Legal Foundation of Silicon Valley: Lessons for Asian Hi-Tech Districts vol.3, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.7545/ajip.2014.3.1.001
  2. Innovation System Transition-The case of Daedeok Innopolis vol.null, pp.104, 2014, https://doi.org/10.18207/criso.2014..104.300
  3. Post catch-up with market cultivation and product servicising: case of Taiwan’s transportation equipment industries vol.24, pp.sup1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1080/19761597.2016.1207421
  4. Platform design and imitative innovation inside the transition black-box: Korean nuclear power plant APR1400 case vol.22, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1080/19761597.2014.905230