Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society (한국산학기술학회논문지)

The Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society (한국산학기술학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Effect of Form of Outsole on Energy Consumption and Heart Rate during Gait

보행시 신발 밑창 형태가 에너지 소비 및 심박수에 미치는 영향

  • Park, Jin-Kook (Division of Exercise Precription, Dongseo University) ;
  • Choi, Hyun-Hee (Division of Exercise Precription, Dongseo University)
  • 박진국 (동서대학교 운동처방학전공) ;
  • 최현희 (동서대학교 운동처방학전공)
  • Received : 2012.12.21
  • Accepted : 2013.03.07
  • Published : 2013.03.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to analysis the effect of form of outsole - complex function double rocker sole(CDR) vs. negative-heel rocker sole (NR) - on energy consumption and heart rate intensity during gait. 11 women, who had no medical history on musculoskeletal disease and surgery within 3 years prior to study, were participated. The walking energy cost per time (WECt) during 35minutes, heart rate intensity, and total calorie consumption were compared by using pair t-test. The WECt and total calorie consumption were found to be significantly higher(p<.05) in CDR than NR. However, there was no difference in HRi. Based on the present study, CDR shoe may have significant implications in shoe prescription for people who want to increase energy consumption.

본 연구에서는 double rocker sole을 채용한 기능성(complex function double rocker sole; CDR) 신발과 negative-heel rocker sole(NR)을 채용한 신발의 보행 중 에너지 소비량을 비교하여 보행시 에너지 사용을 증가시킬 수 있는 기능성 신발에 대한 기초자료를 제공하고자 하였다. 이를 위해 2011년 3~8월까지 40~50대 중년여성 11명을 대상으로 inbody 4.0 (Biospace, Korea)로 체성분 검사와 Vmax ST(SensorMedics, USA)로 운동부하 심폐기능 검사를 실시한 후, 분당 보행에너지 소비량(walking energy cost per time; WECt)과 심박수 운동강도(Heart rate intensity; HRi)를 산출하였다. 연구 결과, CDR신발은 NR신발에 비하여 심박수 운동강도의 통계적 유의차 없이 분당 보행에너지 소비량과 총 칼로리 소비량이 높게 나타나, CDR신발은 동일한 운동 조건 속에서 자각적 운동강도를 증가시키지 않고 운동량을 증가시킬 수 있으므로 에너지소모량을 높이고자 하는 사람에게 적합할 것으로 생각된다.

Keywords

References

  1. WHO forum and technical meeting. Population-based prevention strategies for childhood obesity. Geneva. 2009.
  2. B. M. Popkin, L. S. Adair, S. W. Ng. Global nutrition transition and the pandemic of obesity in developing countries. Nutr Rev. 70(1), 3-21 2012. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-4887.2011.00456.x
  3. C. Tudor-Locke, C. L. Craig, W. J. Brown, S. A. Clemes, K. De Cocker, B. Giles-Corti, Y. Hatano, S. Inoue, S. M. Matsudo, N. Mutrie, J. M. Oppert, D. A. Rowe, M. D. Schmidt, G. M. Schofield, J. C. Spence, P. J. Teixeira, M. A. Tully, S. N. Blair. How Many Steps/day are Enough? For Adults. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity. 8:79. 2011. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-8-78
  4. Ministry of Health & Welfare. Korea Health Statistics 2010 : Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey(KNHANES V-1). 26-27. 2011.
  5. J. M. Van Swearingen, S. Perera, J. S. Brach, R. Cham, C. Rosano, S. A. Studenski. A randomized trial of two forms of therapeutic activity to improve walking: effect on the energy cost of walking. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 64(11). 1190-1198. 2009. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glp098
  6. C. Bosco, R. Saggini, A. Viru. The influence of different floor stiffness on mechanical efficiency of leg extensor muscle. Ergonomics. 40(6). 670-679. 1997. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/001401397187964
  7. K. Sekizawa, M. A. Sandrey, C. D. Ingersoll, M. L. Cordova. Effects of shoe sole thickness on joint position sense. Gait Posture. 13(3). 221-228. 2001. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0966-6362(01)00099-6
  8. G. S. Murley, K. B. Landorf, H. B. Menz. Do foot orthoses change lower limb muscle activity in flat-arched feet towards a pattern observed in normal-arched feet? Clin Biomech.25(7). 728-736. 2010. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2010.05.001
  9. D.T. Fong, Y. Hong, J.X. Li. Cushioning and lateral stability functions of cloth sport shoes. Sports Biomech. 6(3), 407-417. 2007. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14763140701491476
  10. D. Wezenberg, A. de Haan, C.A. van Bennekom, H. Houdijk. Mind your step: Metabolic energy cost while walking an enforced gait pattern. Gait Posture. 33(4), 544-549. 2011. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.01.007
  11. B. Nigg, S. Hintzen, R. Ferber. Effect of an unstable shoe construction on lower extremity gait characteristics. Clin Biomech. 21(1). 82-88. 2006. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2005.08.013
  12. J. Romkes, C. Rudmann, R. Brunner. Changes in gait and EMG when walking with the Masai Barefoot Technique. Clin Biomech. 21(1). 75-81. 2006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2005.08.003
  13. J. X. Li, Y. Hong. Kinematic and electromyographic analysis of the trunk and lower limbs during walking in negative-heeled shoes. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 97(6). 447-456. 2007. https://doi.org/10.7547/0970447
  14. M. Buchecker, T, Stoggl, E. Muller. Spine kinematics and trunk muscle activity during bipedal standing using unstable footwear. Scand J Med Sci Sports. doi: 10.1111/sms.12053. [Epub ahead of print]. 2013. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/sms.12053
  15. A. S. Susan. Uptodate. Clinical features; evaluation; and diagnosis of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. [cited 2012 Oct. 31], Available From: www.uptodate.com/contents/clinical-features-evaluationand- diagnosis-of-adolescent-idiopathic-scoliosis?source=search_result&search=scoliosis&selectedTitle=1%7E150 (accessed Feb, 7, 2013)
  16. B. C. Albright, W. M. Woodhull-Smith. Rocker bottom soles alter the postural response to backward translation during stance. Gait Posture. 30(1). 45-49. 2009. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2009.02.012
  17. D. Brown, J. J. Wertsch, G. F. Harris, J. Klein, D. Janisse. Effect of rocker soles on plantar pressures. Arch Phys Med Rehab. 85(1). 81-86. 2004. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0003-9993(03)00374-5
  18. J. T. Long, J. P. Klein, N. M. Sirota, J. J. Wertsch, D. Janisse, G. F. Harris. Biomechanics of the double rocker sole shoe: gait kinematics and kinetics. J Biomech. 40(13). 2882-2890. 2007. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2007.03.009
  19. D. J. Janisse. The diabetic foot, 1st ed. St. Louis, MO: CV Mosby. 1993.
  20. K. A. Myers, J. T. Long, J. P. Klein, J. J. Wertsch, D. Janisse, G. F. Harris. Biomechanical implications of the negative heel rocker sole shoe: gait kinematics and kinetics. Gait Posture. 24(30). 323-330. 2006. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2005.10.006
  21. R. J. Albensi, J. Nyland, D. N. Caborn. The relationship of body weight and clinical foot and ankle measurements to the heel forces of forward and backward walking. J Athl Train. 34(4). 328-333. 1999.
  22. K. A. Boyer, T. P. Andriacchi. Changes in running kinematics and kinetics in response to a rockered shoe intervention. Clin Biomech. 24(10). 872-876. 2009. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2009.08.003
  23. K. O. Yi. Mechanical Calory Expenditure Map based on the Effects of Shoe and Road Types . Korean Physical Eucation Association for Girls and Women, 23(3). 23-38. 2009.
  24. S. J. van Engelen, Q. E. Wajer, L. W. van der Plaat, H. C. Doets, C. N. van Dijk, H. Houdijk. Metabolic cost and mechanical work during walking after tibiotalar arthrodesis and the influence of footwear. Clin Biomech 25(8). 809-815. 2010. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2010.05.008
  25. J. A. Mercer, D. A. Branks, S. K. Wasserman, C. M. Ross. Physiological cost of running while wearing spring-boots. J Strength Cond Res. 17(2). 314-318. 2003. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1519/00124278-200305000-00015
  26. L. A. Anjos, V. Wahrlich, F. M. Bossan, M. N. Salies, P. B. Silva. Energy expenditure of walking at different inensities in Brazilian college women. Clin Nutr. 27(1). 121-125. 2008. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2007.09.007
  27. E. E. Thomas, D. Stewart, S. Mitchell, K Aiken, D Farina, A Macaluso. Comparison of neural activation and energy cost during treadmill walking with body weight unloading between frail and healthy older women. Gait Posture. 33(3), 356-360. 2011. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2010.12.001
  28. D. Bourgit, G. Y. Millet, J. Fuchslocher. Influence of shoes increasing dorsiflexion and decreasing metatarsus flexion on lower limb muscular activity during fitness exercises, walking, and running. J Strength Cond Res. 22(3). 966-973. 2008. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0b013e31816f1354
  29. M. T. Vanderpool, S. H. Collins, A. D. Kuo. Ankle fixation need not increase the energetic cost of human walking. Gait Posture. 28(3). 427-433. 2008. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2008.01.016
  30. Y. W Seo, H. J. Lee, K. E. Yun, H. S. Park. Energy Intake and Resting Energy Expenditure of Middle-aged Obese Korean Women. Korean Journal of Obesity, 18(1). 31-37. 2009.
  31. M. Buckheit P. B. Laursen, F. Leblond, S. Ahmaid. Effect of dorsiflexion shoes on the energy cost of running. science & sports 2010;25: 81-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scispo.2009.08.001
  32. P. E. Martin. Mechanical and physiological responses to lower extremity loading during running. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 17(4). 427-433. 1985. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1249/00005768-198508000-00004
  33. J. S. Kim, H. H. Choi. The Effect of Form of Outsole on Lower Leg Electromyography during Gait. Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society. 13(1). .227-235. 2012. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2012.13.1.227
  34. D. William, L. K. Victor. Essentials of exercise physiology. Malvern, USA. 2005.