DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

On an Approach to Measuring the System Performance by Utilizing the Combined System Readiness Level and Achieved Technical Performance in Weapon Systems Development

무기체계개발에서 시스템 성숙도와 기술적 성능 달성도를 연계한 시스템 성능 측정 방법

  • 권일호 (방위사업청 정보화기획담당관실) ;
  • 이재천 (아주대학교 시스템공학과)
  • Received : 2013.07.17
  • Accepted : 2013.09.06
  • Published : 2013.09.30

Abstract

The recent studies indicated that the major sources of the failure in carrying out the programs of weapon systems development would be the unsatisfaction of the required key performance and also the use of premature technology. As such, to manage the risk during the weapon systems development, the use of the technical performance measurement (TPM) and the technology maturity assessment (TMA) turned out to be necessary. However, the TPM studied so far seems to cover the assessment of performance at the component level only, and thus is insufficient in considering the system integration effect. On the other hand, the system readiness level (SRL) method has been presented by reflecting the effect on system integration, but the system performance and maturity has not been considered. To overcome this, a measurement method is proposed in the paper by utilizing the combined system readiness level and achieved technical performance at the system level. This system performance measure can be useful in managing the risk in the weapon systems development.

최근의 무기체계 연구개발에서 실패의 주요인은 요구되는 핵심성능의 미충족과 기술성숙도 부족이다. 이러한 실패의 가능성에 대한 위험관리를 위해서 기술성능측정 관리와 기술성숙도 평가의 수행이 필요하다. 하지만 일반적인 기술성능측정 관리 기법의 적용은 컴포넌트 수준 이하에 대한 측정으로 시스템 통합의 효과를 반영하는 데는 제한이 있다. 한편으로 시스템 통합에 대한 효과를 반영하기 위한 시스템 성숙도 측정 방법이 제시되었지만 성능과 기술성숙도를 분명하게 연계시키지는 못했다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 컴포넌트 수준으로부터 상방향으로 확대하여 시스템 수준에서의 기술적 성능 달성도 평가방법과 함께 시스템 성숙도를 연계하는 시스템 성능 달성도 측정 기법을 제시하였다. 이를 통해 무기체계개발에서 위험관리에 활용할 수 있게 된다.

Keywords

References

  1. DAPA, DAPA Anweisung No. 188, Defense Acquisition Regulation, 2012. 7.
  2. Defense Acquisition University Press, Systems Engineering Fundamentals, DAU Press, Verginia 22060-5565, January, 2001.
  3. DAPA, EVM Instruction, Published rulings 87, 2012.10.
  4. DAPA, TRA Instruction, Instruction NO 2012-8, 2012. 4.
  5. Brian J. Sauser, Jose Ramirez-Marquez, Romulo Magnaye, Weiping Tan, "A Systems Approach to Expanding the Technology Readiness Level within Defense Acquisition", Stevens Institute of Technology, Mar. 2009.
  6. DAPA, On an Improved Method and Failure Case for Defense Research and Development, Korea Research Institute for Military Affairs, 2010. 8.
  7. Paul R. Garvey, Chien-Cing Cho, "An Index to Measure and Monitor a System-of-System' Performance Risk", the MITRE Corporation, MITRE Paper MP 04B0000050, December, 2004
  8. Brian Sauser, Jose Ramirez-Marquez, Dinesh Verma, Ryan Gove, "From TRL to SRL : The Concept of Systems Readiness Levels", Stevens Institute of Technology, 2006.
  9. Ryan Bove, Joe Uzdzinski, A Performance-Based System Maturity Assessment Framework, Lockheed Martin Corporate Engineering & Technology, 2121 Crystal Drive, Arlington, VA 22202, USA, March. 2013
  10. Garry J. Roedler, Cheryl Jones, "Technical Measurement", INCOSE, December. 2005.
  11. Joseph A. Fernandez, "Contextual Role of TRLs and MRLs in Technology Management" Sandia National Lab, California, SAND2010-7595, Nov. 2010.