DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The design considerations of steel braced frame for seismic retrofit through increasing the lateral strength of existing RC buildings

철골브레이스에 의한 기존 RC건축물의 강도상승형 내진보강을 위한 설계고려사항

  • 안충원 (한국시설안전공단 건축실) ;
  • 윤정환 (한국시설안전공단 건축실) ;
  • 송동엽 (한국시설안전공단 건축실) ;
  • 장범수 (한국시설안전공단 시설안전연구소) ;
  • 민찬기 (한국시설안전공단 시설안전연구소)
  • Received : 2013.08.20
  • Accepted : 2013.10.08
  • Published : 2013.11.01

Abstract

This paper deals with steel braced frame as increasing the lateral strength and ductility in order to seismic retrofit of existing buildings and discusses the designing criteria and calculation method of retrofitted buildings. The addition of steel braced frame can be effective for increasing the lateral strength and ductility of existing buildings. However, There is a problem in utilizing this method. It is the approach to provide an adequate connection between the existing RC frame and the installed steel braced frame, because global strength by failure mode(three type) depends on detail of connection and strength of existing RC frame. So, the designer must be confirmed if it satisfies the required performance or not. Failure mode of type I is the most appropriate for increasing the lateral strength and ductility. Seismic performance evaluation and strength calculation of seismic retrofit are performed by guideline by KISTEC(Korea Infrastructure Safety & Technology)'s "seismic performance evaluation and rehabilitation of existing buildings" and Japan Building Disaster Prevention Association. Buildings are modeled and non-linear pushover analysis are performed using MIDAS program.

Keywords

References

  1. KISC. Guidelines for seismic performance evaluation and rehabilitation of existing buildings. Kyeonggi-do, Korea: Korea Infrastructure Safety Corporation; c2004. 224p.
  2. KISC. Guidelines for seismic performance evaluation and rehabilitation of existing buildings. Kyeonggi-do, Korea: Korea Infrastructure Safety Corporation; c2011. 115p.
  3. KEDI. Guidelines for seismic performance evaluation and rehabilitation of school buildings. Seoul, Korea: Korean Educational Development Institute; c2011. 112p.
  4. NEMA. Guidelines for seismic performance evaluation of buildings. Seoul, Korea: National Emergency Management Agency; c2012. 150p.
  5. ASCE41. Seismic rehabilitation of existing buildings. Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers; c2006. 411p.
  6. JBDPA. Standard and commentary for seismic evaluation of existing reinforced concrete buildings. Tokyo, Japan: Japan Building Disaster Prevention Association; c2001.
  7. FEMA356. Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings: Federal Emergency Management Agency; c2000.
  8. JBDPA, Standard and commentary for seismic retrofit of existing reinforced concrete buildings. Tokyo, Japan: Japan Building Disaster Prevention Association; c2001.
  9. KBC 2009. Korean building code-structural. Seoul, Korea: Architectural Institute of Korea; c2009. 772p.
  10. AIJ. Design Recommendations for Composite Construction(AIJ Design Composite Construction 1985): Architecture Institute of Japan; c1985.
  11. Mattock A. H. et al. Shear Transfer in Reinforced Concrete. ACI Journal. 1969;66:119-128.
  12. MIDAS GEN User's Manual. ver 800: MIDAS IT; c2012.
  13. Kim TW, Min CG. Analytical Study of the Effect of Full and Partial Masonry Infills on the Seismic Performance of School Bulidings. Journal of the Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea. 2013 Sep; 17(5):197-207. https://doi.org/10.5000/EESK.2013.17.5.197

Cited by

  1. Influence of Joint on Retrofitting Effect by Exterior Steel Frames of Existing RC Buildings vol.19, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5000/EESK.2015.19.4.183