Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment (환경영향평가)

Korean Society of Environmental Impact Assessment (한국환경영향평가학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of Physical environmental factors on Radiation fluxes in Urban areas

도시지역의 물리적 환경요소가 복사에너지 흐름에 미치는 영향

  • Received : 2014.10.10
  • Accepted : 2014.12.16
  • Published : 2014.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to develop urban planning for mitigating thermal comfort by analyzing the relationship between various physical environmental factors and radiation fluxes focused on urban areas of Changwon city, Gyeongsangnam-do. Physical environmental factors were analyzed by sky view factor (SVF), land cover and land use types using GIS program. Radiation fluxes were measured upward and downward in solar and terrestrial radiation by mobile measurement during 3 days (2 daytime and 1 nighttime) in summer season. SVF is high in urban park less around buildings. High dense building sites were low. Downward solar radiation fluxes were the highest about $700W/m^2$ at daytime, and decreased in spatial type arranged dense buildings. Upward solar and terrestrial radiations was affected by land cover types that have thermal features such as reflectivity, emissivity, and heat capacity. Therefore, urban space needs appropriate planning with building arrangement, green walls and land cover replacement for mitigating thermal comfort in urban area.

본 연구는 창원시 도시지역을 대상으로 다양한 물리적 환경요인과 복사에너지 간의 관계성을 분석함으로서 열쾌적성을 개선하기 위한 계획 방안을 마련하는데 목적이 있다. 물리적 환경요인은 건물의 배치형태를 고려한 Sky view factor(SVF)와 토지피복 및 토지이용유형을 고려하였고, 복사에너지는 여름철에 주간 및 야간으로 3일 동안 이동식으로 태양 및 지구복사에너지의 유입과 유출량을 측정하였다. SVF를 분석한 결과 주변에 건물이 거의 존재하지 않는 도시공원에서 높았고, 반면에 고층의 건물이 밀집된 고층아파트와 상업지역은 매우 낮은 수치를 보였다. 복사에너지는 주간시간은 지표면으로 유입되는 태양복사에너지가 약 $700W/m^2$로 가장 높았고, 야간시간에는 지구복사에너지의 유입과 유출만 있고, 그 양은 약 $450W/m^2$이였다. 지표면으로 유입되는 태양복사에너지는 건물이 밀집된 공간형태일수록 감소하는 경향을 보였고, 대기중으로 향하는 태양 및 지구복사에너지는 반사율과 방사율, 그리고 열용량과 같은 열적특성에 따른 영향이 큰 것으로 나타났다. 그러므로 도시지역의 열쾌적성을 개선하기 위해서는 건물이 밀집된 지역에 대해 배치형태를 조정하거나 벽면녹화를 조성하고, 지표면에 자연적 피복재질로 교체하는 계획방안이 필요할 것으로 판단된다.

Keywords

References

  1. 강동현, 최철현, 정성관. 2014. 영남지역의 토지 피복에 따른 열쾌적성 평가도 구축, 한국지리정보학회지 17(2), 136-155. (Kang, D. H., Choi, C. H. and Jung, S. G. 2014. Development of Thermal Comfort Evaluation Map by the Land Cover in Yeongnam Region, Journal of the Korean Association of Geographic Information Studies 17(2), 136-155.)
  2. 백상훈, 시미즈아키, 김학윤, 정응호. 2011. 도시가로공간의 공공디자인 개선사업에 따른 열환경 개선 효과 평가, 한국환경과학회지 20(9), 1105-1114. (Baek, S., Aki Shimizu, Kim, H. Y. and Jung, E. H. 2011. Evaluation of Thermal Environment Improvement Effect from Public Design Improvement Project on the Urban Street Space, Journal of the Environmental Sciences, 20(9), 1105-1114.) https://doi.org/10.5322/JES.2011.20.9.1105
  3. 송봉근, 박경훈. 2011. 도시기후 형성 요소를 고려한 공간유형 분류-창원시를 대상으로-, 환경영향평가 20(3), 299-311.
  4. 송봉근. 2014. 도시지역의 기후변화 및 열섬효과 완화를 위한 환경계획 기법의 개발, 창원대학교 박사학위논문(Song, B. G. 2014. Development of Environmental Planning Methodology for Mitigation of Climate change and Heat island effect in Urban area, Ph.D DISSERTATION, Changwon National University, Korea.)
  5. 이민복. 2014. 수도권 신도시의 열쾌적성 평가, 한양대학교 석사학위논문.(Lee, M., 2014. Evaluation of thermal comfort of new towns in Seoul metropolitan area, Master thesis, Hanyang University.)
  6. 이정아, 정대영, 전진형, 이상문, 송영배. 2010. 공간 구조별 열쾌적성 평가와 열환경 개선방안, 한국조경학회지 38(5), 12-20.(Lee, J. A., Jung, D. Y., Chon, J. H., Lee, S. M. and Song, Y. B. 2010. An Evaluation of Human Thermal Comfort and Improvement of Thermal Environment by Spatial Structure, Journal of the Korea Institute of Landscape Architecture, 38(5), 12-20.)
  7. 질병관리본부. 2013. 폭염으로 인한 온열질환 신고현황 연보, 주간 건강과 질병보고서.(Korea Center for Disease Control and Prevention. 2013. Annual Report on the Notified Patients with Heat related illness in Korea, Public Health Weekly Report.)
  8. 창원시. 2009. 창원시 환경지도 제작 및 GIS구축, 창원시 연구보고서.(Changwon-si. 2009. Changwon-si environmental atlas and GIS construction, Changwon-si report)
  9. Chen, H., Ooka, R., Huang, H. and Tsuchiya, T. 2009. Study on mitigation measures for outdoor thermal environment on present urban blocks in Tokyo using coupled simulation, Building and Environment 44, 2290-2299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2009.03.012
  10. Cheng, V., Steemers, K., Montavon, M. and Compagnon, R. 2006. Urban Form, Density and Solar Potential. Conference on Passive and Low Energy Architecture, Geneva, Switzerland.
  11. Emmanuel, R. 1997. Summertime heat island effects of urban design parameters, PhD thesis, The University of Michigan.
  12. Erell, E., Pearlmutter, D. and Williamson, T. 2011. Urban Microclimate -Designing the Spaces Between Buildings-, earthscan, London and Washington, DC.
  13. Giridharan, R., Lau, S.S.Y., Ganesan, S., and Givoni, B. 2008. Lowering the outdoor temperature in high-rise high-density residential developments of coastal Hong Kong: The vegetation influence, Building and Environment 43, 1583-1595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2007.10.003
  14. Givoni, B. 1998. Climate considerations in building and urban design, USA, Wiley.
  15. Gulyas, A., Unger, J. and Matzarakis, A. 2006. Assessment of the microclimatic and human comfort conditions in a complex urban environment: Modelling and measurements, Building and Environment 41, 1713-1722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2005.07.001
  16. Huang, J., Laurent, J. G. C., Spengler, J. and Reinhart, C. 2012. A GIS-BASED ASSESSMENT MTEHOD FOR MEAN RADIANT TEMPERATURE IN DENSE URBAN AREA, Fifth National Conference of IBPSA-USA. Madison, Wisconsin. August 1-3, 246-254.
  17. Lai, P. Low, C., Tse, W.C., Tsui, C., Lee, H. and Hui, P. 2013. Risk of tuberculosis in high-rise and high density dwellings: An exploratory spatial analysis, Environmental Pollution 183, 40-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2012.11.025
  18. Lai, D., Guo, D., Hou, Y., Lin, C. and Chen, Q. 2014. Studies of outdoor thermal comfort in northern China, Building and Environment 77, 110-118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2014.03.026
  19. Li, X., Wang, C., Hang, G., Xiao, L. and Dixon, J. 2012. Urbanization and human health in China: spatial features and a systemic perspective, Environmental Science and Pollution Research 19, 1375-1384. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-011-0718-7
  20. Matzarakis, A., Rutz, F. and Mayer, H. 2007. Modelling radiation fluxes in simple and complex environments-application of the RayMan model, International Journal of Biometeorology 51, 323-334. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-006-0061-8
  21. Memon, R. A., Leung, D. Y. C. and Liu, C. 2009. An investigation of urban island intensity (UHI) as an indicator of urban heating. Atmospheric Research 94, 491-500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2009.07.006
  22. Oke, T. R. 1981. Canyon geometry and the nocturnal heat island: comparison of scale model and field observations, Journal of Climatology, 1, 237-254. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.3370010304
  23. Shashua-Bar, L., Hoffman, M. E. 2000. Vegetation as a climate component in the design of an urban street An empirical model for predicting the cooling effect of urban green areas with trees, Energy and Building 31, 221-235. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7788(99)00018-3
  24. Shashua-Bar, L., Hoffman, M.E. and Tzamir, Y. 2006. Integrated thermal effects of generic built forms and vegetation on the UCL microclimate, Building and Environment 41, 343-354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2005.01.032
  25. Spangenberg, J., Shinzato, P., Johansson, E., and Duarte, D. 2008. Simulation of the influence of vegetation on microclimate and thermal comfort in the city of Sao Paulo, Rev. SBAU, Piracicaba 3(2), 1-19.
  26. Svensson, M. K. 2004. Sky view facotr analysis - implications for urban air temperature differences, Meteorological Applications, 11, 201-211. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1350482704001288
  27. Villadiego, K., Velay-Dabat, M. A. 2014. Outdoor thermal comfort in a hot and humid climate of Colombia: A field study in Barranquilla, Building and Environment 75, 142-152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2014.01.017
  28. Watson, I. D. and Johnson, G. T. 1987. Graphical estimation of sky view factors in urban environments, International Journal of Climatology, 7, 193-197. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.3370070210
  29. http:www.saga-gis.org