Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention

  • 제15권22호
  • /
  • Pages.9985-9996
  • /
  • 2014
  • /
  • 1513-7368(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2476-762X(eISSN)
아시아태평양암예방학회 (Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery for Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

  • Zhang, Feng-Wa (The First Clinical Medical School, Lanzhou University) ;
  • Zhou, Zhao-Yu (Postgraduate School, Lanzhou University) ;
  • Wang, Hai-Lin (The Second Department of Gynecology, Gansu Provincial Hospital) ;
  • Zhang, Jv-Xia (Nursing Department, Gansu Provincial Hospital) ;
  • Di, Bao-Shan (Department of Emergency Surgery, Gansu Provincial Hospital) ;
  • Huang, Wen-Hui (Department of Nephrology, Gansu Provincial Hospital) ;
  • Yang, Ke-Hu (Evidence Based Medicine Center, Lanzhou University)
  • 발행 : 2014.12.18
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Background and Aim: Laparoscopic and open rectum surgery for rectal cancer remains controversial. This systematic review compared the short-term and long-term efficiency and complications associated with laparoscopic and open resection for rectal cancer. Materials and Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, ISI Web of Knowledge and the China Biology Medicine Database to identify potential randomized controlled trials from their inception to March 31, 2014 without language restriction. Additional articles were identified from searching bibliographies of retrieved articles. Two reviewers independently assessed the full-text articles according to the pre-specified inclusion and exclusion criteria as well as the methodological quality of included trials. The meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.2. Results: A total of 16 randomized controlled trials involving 3,045 participants (laparoscopic group, 1,804 cases; open group, 1,241 cases) were reviewed. Laparoscopic surgery was associated with significantly lower intraoperative blood loss, earlier return of bowel movement and reduced length of hospital stay as compared to open surgery, although with increased operative time. It also showed an obvious advantage for minimizing late complications of adhesion-related bowel obstruction. Importantly, there were no significant differences in other postoperative complications, oncological clearance, 3-year and 5-year or 10 year recurrence and survival rates between two procedures. Conclusions: On the basis of this meta-analysis we conclude that laparoscopic surgery has advantages of earlier postoperative recovery, less blood loss and lower rates of adhesion-related bowel obstruction. In addition, oncological outcome is comparable after laparoscopic and open resection for rectal cancer.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Adam IJ, Mohamdee MO, Martin IG, et al (1994). Role of circumferential margin involvement in the local recurrence of rectal cancer. Lancet, 344, 707-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(94)92206-3
  2. Araujo SE, da Silva eSousa AH, Jr., de Campos FG, et al (2003). Conventional approach x laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer treatment after neoadjuvant chemoradiation: results of a prospective randomized trial. Rev Hosp Clin Fac Med Sao Paulo, 58, 133-40. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0041-87812003000300002
  3. Aziz O, Constantinides V, Tekkis PP, et al (2006). Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol, 13, 413-24. https://doi.org/10.1245/ASO.2006.05.045
  4. Benson AB, 3rd, Arnoletti JP, Bekaii-Saab T, et al (2011). Colon cancer. J Natl Compr Canc Netw, 9, 1238-90.
  5. Benson AB, 3rd, Bekaii-Saab T, Chan E, et al (2012). Rectal cancer. J Natl Compr Canc Netw, 10, 1528-64.
  6. Bonjer HJ, Hop WC, Nelson H, et al (2007). Laparoscopically assisted vs open colectomy for colon cancer: a meta-analysis. Arch Surg, 142, 298-303. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.142.3.298
  7. Braga M, Frasson M, Vignali A, et al (2007). Laparoscopic resection in rectal cancer patients: outcome and cost-benefit analysis. Dis Colon Rectum, 50, 464-71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-006-0798-5
  8. Breukink S, Pierie J, Wiggers T (2006). Laparoscopic versus open total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, CD005200.
  9. Buunen M, Bonjer HJ, Hop WC, et al (2009). COLOR II. A randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery for rectal cancer. Dan Med Bull, 56, 89-91.
  10. da Luz Moreira A, Mor I, Geisler DP, et al (2011). Laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer: a case-matched study. Surg Endosc, 25, 278-83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-1174-z
  11. Di B, Li Y, Wei K, et al (2013). Laparoscopic versus open surgery for colon cancer: A meta-analysis of 5-year followup outcomes. Surg Oncol, 22, 39-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suronc.2013.03.002
  12. Gao F, Cao YF, Chen LS (2006). Meta-analysis of short-term outcomes after laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis, 21, 652-6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-005-0079-0
  13. Gezen C, Altuntas YE, Kement M, et al (2012). Laparoscopic and conventional resections for low rectal cancers: a retrospective analysis on perioperative outcomes, sphincter preservation, and oncological results. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 22, 625-30. https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2011.0479
  14. Glynne-Jones R, Mawdsley S, Novell JR (2006). The clinical significance of the circumferential resection margin following preoperative pelvic chemo-radiotherapy in rectal cancer: why we need a common language. Colorectal Dis, 8, 800-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-1318.2006.01139.x
  15. Green BL, Marshall HC, Collinson F, et al (2013). Long-term follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of conventional versus laparoscopically assisted resection in colorectal cancer. Br J Surg, 100, 75-82. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.8945
  16. Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, et al (2005). Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet, 365, 1718-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66545-2
  17. Hotta T, Yamaue H (2011). Laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: review of published literature 2000-2009. Surg Today, 41, 1583-91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-010-4555-y
  18. Hozo SP, Djulbegovic B, Hozo I (2005). Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample. BMC Med Res Methodol, 5, 13. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-5-13
  19. Huang MJ, Liang JL, Wang H, et al (2011). Laparoscopicassisted versus open surgery for rectal cancer: a metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials on oncologic adequacy of resection and long-term oncologic outcomes. Int J Colorectal Dis, 26, 415-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-010-1091-6
  20. Jayne DG, Guillou PJ, Thorpe H, et al (2007). Randomized trial of laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma: 3-year results of the UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group. J Clin Oncol, 25, 3061-8. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2006.09.7758
  21. Jayne DG, Thorpe HC, Copeland J, et al (2010). Five-year follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of laparoscopically assisted versus open surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg, 97, 1638-45. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.7160
  22. Kahnamoui K, Cadeddu M, Farrokhyar F, et al (2007). Laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer: a systematic review. Can J Surg, 50, 48-57.
  23. Kang SB, Park JW, Jeong SY, et al (2010). Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid or low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): shortterm outcomes of an open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol, 11, 637-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70131-5
  24. Kitano S, Inomata M, Sato A, et al (2005). Randomized controlled trial to evaluate laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: Japan clinical oncology group study JCOG 0404. Jpn J Clin Oncol, 35, 475-7. https://doi.org/10.1093/jjco/hyi124
  25. Liang X, Hou S, Liu H, et al (2011). Effectiveness and safety of laparoscopic resection versus open surgery in patients with rectal cancer: a randomized, controlled trial from China. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 21, 381-5. https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2010.0059
  26. Liang XB, Hou SH, Li GD, et al (2010). Efficacy of laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer. Chin J Dig Surg, 09, 411-4.
  27. Liu M (2011). The Design and implementation method of systematic review and meta-analysis, 1st edn. People's medical publishing house, Beijing.
  28. Lujan J, Valero G, Hernandez Q, et al (2009). Randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery in patients with rectal cancer. Br J Surg, 96, 982-9. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.6662
  29. Lundh A, Gotzsche PC (2008). Recommendations by cochrane review groups for assessment of the risk of bias in studies. BMC Med Res Methodol, 8, 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-22
  30. Mawdsley S, Glynne-Jones R, Grainger J, et al (2005). Can histopathologic assessment of circumferential margin after preoperative pelvic chemoradiotherapy for T3-T4 rectal cancer predict for 3-year disease-free survival? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 63, 745-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.03.003
  31. Morrison DS, Parr CL, Lam TH, et al (2013). Behavioural and metabolic risk factors for mortality from colon and rectum cancer: analysis of data from the Asia-Pacific Cohort Studies Collaboration. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 14, 1083-7. https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2013.14.2.1083
  32. Nagtegaal ID, Marijnen CA, Kranenbarg EK, et al (2002). Circumferential margin involvement is still an important predictor of local recurrence in rectal carcinoma: not one millimeter but two millimeters is the limit. Am J Surg Pathol, 26, 350-7. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000478-200203000-00009
  33. Nagtegaal ID, Quirke P (2008). What is the role for the circumferential margin in the modern treatment of rectal cancer? J Clin Oncol, 26, 303-12. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2007.12.7027
  34. Ng SS, Leung KL, Lee JF, et al (2009). Long-term morbidity and oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted anterior resection for upper rectal cancer: ten-year results of a prospective, randomized trial. Dis Colon Rectum, 52, 558-66. https://doi.org/10.1007/DCR.0b013e31819ec20c
  35. Ng SS, Leung KL, Lee JF, et al (2008). Laparoscopic-assisted versus open abdominoperineal resection for low rectal cancer: a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg Oncol, 15, 2418-25. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-008-9895-0
  36. Pan YF, Zhang XH, Jia XJ, et al (2007). Laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection for low rectal cancer. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi, 10, 253-6.
  37. Pechlivanides G, Gouvas N, Tsiaoussis J, et al (2007). Lymph node clearance after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: laparoscopic versus open approach. Dig Dis, 25, 94-9. https://doi.org/10.1159/000099176
  38. Sarli L, Bader G, Iusco D, et al (2005). Number of lymph nodes examined and prognosis of TNM stage II colorectal cancer. Eur J Cancer, 41, 272-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2004.10.010
  39. Strohlein MA, Grutzner KU, Jauch KW, et al (2008). Comparison of laparoscopic vs. open access surgery in patients with rectal cancer: a prospective analysis. Dis Colon Rectum, 51, 385-91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-007-9178-z
  40. Taylor GW, Jayne DG, Brown SR, et al (2010). Adhesions and incisional hernias following laparoscopic versus open surgery for colorectal cancer in the CLASICC trial. Br J Surg, 97, 70-8.
  41. Tayyem RF, Shehadeh IN, Abumweis SS, et al (2013). Physical inactivity, water intake and constipation as risk factors for colorectal cancer among adults in Jordan. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 14, 5207-12. https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2013.14.9.5207
  42. Tjandra JJ, Kilkenny JW, Buie WD, et al (2005). Practice parameters for the management of rectal cancer (revised). Dis Colon Rectum, 48, 411-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-0937-9
  43. Trastulli S, Cirocchi R, Listorti C, et al (2012). Laparoscopic vs open resection for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Colorectal Dis, 14, 277-96. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-1318.2012.02985.x
  44. van der Pas MH, Haglind E, Cuesta MA, et al (2013). Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR II): short-term outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol, 14, 210-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70016-0
  45. Xiong B, Ma L, Zhang C (2012). Laparoscopic versus open total mesorectal excision for middle and low rectal cancer: a meta-analysis of results of randomized controlled trials. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 22, 674-84. https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2012.0143
  46. Yang BH, Parkin DM, Cai L, et al (2004). Cancer burden and trends in the Asian Pacific Rim region. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 5, 96-117.
  47. Zhang J, Luo CY, Ji XX, et al (2012). Laparoscopic vs open total mesorectal excision for low rectal cancer: randomized controlled trial. Chin J Min Inv Surg, 12, 27-9.
  48. Zhou ZG, Hu M, Li Y, et al (2004). Laparoscopic versus open total mesorectal excision with anal sphincter preservation for low rectal cancer. Surg Endosc, 18, 1211-5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-003-9170-1

피인용 문헌

  1. Outcomes of Laparoscopic Abdominoperineal Resection in Low Rectal Cancer Using Different Pelvic Drainages vol.16, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2015.16.1.153
  2. Up-to-down rectal resection with total mesorectal excision through single-incision laparoscopy - a video vignette vol.18, pp.6, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.13345
  3. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis of 3-year follow-up outcomes vol.31, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-016-2506-9
  4. Robotic and laparoscopic total mesorectum excision vol.38, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00053-016-0085-4
  5. Laparoscopic surgery for patients with colorectal cancer produces better short-term outcomes with similar survival outcomes in elderly patients compared to open surgery vol.5, pp.6, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.671
  6. Influence of multiple stapler firings used for rectal division on colorectal anastomotic leak rate vol.31, pp.12, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5611-0
  7. Comparison of outcome and cost among open, laparoscopic, and robotic surgical treatments for rectal cancer: A propensity score matched analysis of nationwide inpatient sample data pp.00224790, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.24867
  8. Laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer with rectal prolapse: a case report vol.12, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13256-017-1555-1
  9. Security and Radical Assessment in Open, Laparoscopic, Robotic Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Comparative Study vol.17, pp.1533-0338, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1177/1533033818794160
  10. Laparoscopic Versus Conventional Open Surgery in Intersphincteric Resection for Low Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis vol.28, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2017.0495