Comparison of Heparin Solution and 0.9% Normal Saline Solution Flushing to Secure the Patency of Non-Tunneled Central Venous Catheters

비턴넬형 중심정맥관 개방성 유지를 위한 헤파린 희석액 관류와 생리식염수 관류의 비교

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of heparin and 0.9% normal saline solution flushing for maintaining patency of non­tunneled central venous catheters in patients with surgery. Methods: A randomized controlled clinical trial was performed. Fifty­eight patients were prospectively enrolled and fifty-four patients were completed the study. The heparin group consisted of 30 patients given 100u/ml diluted heparin flushing and the normal saline group consisted of 24 patients with 0.9% sodium chloride flushing. Results: There was no significantly difference in occlusion between the heparin group and the normal saline group in non­tunneled central venous catheters' occlusion. Also there was no difference between these two groups in catheter­related infections. Conclusion: Flushing with 0.9% normal saline is as effective as flushing with heparin solution in maintaining the patency of non­tunneled central venous catheters. In this study, however, the duration of central line use was short and the infection occurrence was little. Further studies are warranted with a larger sample size at multiple centers.