DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Modification of a Smoking Motivation Questionnaire for Chinese Medical Students

  • Jiang, Chao (School of Public Health, Wannan Medical College) ;
  • Sun, Wen-Jie (School of Food Science, Guangdong Pharmaceutical University) ;
  • Wan, Yan-Chun (School of Public Health, Wannan Medical College) ;
  • Wei, Ming-Wei (School of Public Health, Wannan Medical College) ;
  • Mu, Yong-Ping (Department of Clinical Laboratory Centre, The Affiliated People's Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University) ;
  • Tarver, Siobhan L. (Department of Global Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, Tulane University) ;
  • Gao, Yong-Qing (School of Food Science, Guangdong Pharmaceutical University) ;
  • Hu, Tian (Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, Tulane University) ;
  • Xu, Chao (Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, Tulane University) ;
  • Gordon, James (Department of Economics, Tulane University) ;
  • Feng, Cindy Xin (School of Public Health, University of Saskatchewan) ;
  • Wen, Yu-Feng (School of Public Health, Wannan Medical College)
  • Published : 2014.03.30

Abstract

Introduction: Smoking prevalence among the medical students is high in China. Therefore, understanding the smoking motivations of medical students is crucial for smoking control, but currently there are no scales questionnaires customized for probing the smoking motivations of medical students. This aim of study was to test and modify a questionnaire for investigating smoking motivations among medical students. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 1,125 medical students at Xuzhou Medical College in China in 2012.The model fit and validity was assessed by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and the reliability was tested by single-item reliability, composite reliability, and item-total correlation. Results: The prevalence of smoking was 9.84 % among study population. In the modified scales, the global fit indices identified a CFI value of 0.96, TLI was 0.96, and the RMSEA was 0.063. CFA supported the two dimensional structure of the instrument. The average variance extracted ranged from 0.45 to 0.62. All single-item reliability scores were greater than 0.20, and the composite reliability ranged from 0.74 to 0.91. Conclusion: Modified scales could be the preliminary instrument used in evaluating the smoking motivations of medical students. However, it should be further assessed using other forms and methods of validity and reliability, additional motivations of smoking, and the survey of other medical colleges in China.

Keywords

References

  1. Naggar RA, Dubai SA, Naggar TH, et al (2011). Prevalence and of smoking associated factors among Malaysian University students. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 12, 619-24.
  2. Al-Naggar RA, Bobryshev YV (2012). Shisha smoking and associated factors among medical students in Malaysia. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 13, 5627-32. https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2012.13.11.5627
  3. Araya A MV, Leal SF, Huerta GP, et al (2012). The influence of smoking habits of Chilean physicians on the use of the structured medical advice about smoking. Rev Med Chil, 140, 347-52 https://doi.org/10.4067/S0034-98872012000300010
  4. Azhar A, Alsayed N (2012). Prevalence of smoking among female medical students in Saudai Arabia. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 13, 4245-8. https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2012.13.9.4245
  5. Bagozzi RP, Yi Y (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. J Acad Market Sci, 16, 74-94. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02723327
  6. Beauducel A, Herzberg PY (2006). On the performance of maximum likelihood versus means and variance adjusted weighted least squares estimation in CFA. Struc Equ Mod 13, 186-203. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1302_2
  7. Berlin I, Singleton EG, Pedarriosse AM, et al (2003). The Modified Reasons for Smoking Scale: factorial structure, gender effects and relationship with nicotine dependence and smoking cessation in French smokers. Addiction, 98, 1575-83. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1360-0443.2003.00523.x
  8. Bowen S, Kurz AS (2012). Smoking, nicotine dependence, and motives to quit in Asian American versus Caucasian college students. Nicotine Tob Res, 14, 1235-40. https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntr281
  9. El Ansari W, Stock C (2012). Factors associated with smoking, quit attempts and attitudes towards total smoking bans at university: a survey of seven universities in England, Wales and Northern Ireland. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 13, 705-14. https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2012.13.2.705
  10. Flynn LR, Pearcy AD (2001). Four subtle sins in scale development: some suggestions for strengthening the current paradigm. Int J Market Res, 43, 409-24.
  11. Fornell C, Larcker DF (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J Market Res (JMR), 18, 1. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151309
  12. Global Youth Tabacco Survey Collaborative (2002). Tobacco use among youth: a cross country comparison. Tobacco Control, 11, 252. https://doi.org/10.1136/tc.11.3.252
  13. Golbasi Z, Kaya D, Cetindag A, et al (2011). Smoking prevalence and associated attitudes among high school students in Turkey. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 12, 1313-6.
  14. Hu LT, Bentler PM (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 01-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
  15. Hum AM, Robinson LA, Jackson AA, et al (2011). Physician communication regarding smoking and adolescent tobacco use. Pediatrics, 127, 1368-74. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2010-1195
  16. Joreskog KG (1971). Statistical analysis of sets of congeneric tests. Psychometrika, 36, 109-33. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291393
  17. Kenny DA, McCoach DB (2003). Effect of the number of variables on measures of fit in structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 10, 333-51. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM1003_1
  18. Kusma B, Quarcoo D, Vitzthum K, et al (2010). Berlin's medical students' smoking habits, knowledge about smoking and attitudes toward smoking cessation counseling. J Occup Med Toxico, l5, 9.
  19. Litvin EB, Brandon TH (2010). Testing the influence of external and internal cues on smoking motivation using a community sample. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol, 18, 61. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017414
  20. MacCallum RC, Browne MW, Sugawara HM (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychol Meth, 1, 130. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.1.2.130
  21. Muttappallymyalil J, Divakaran B, Thomas T, et al (2012). Prevalence of tobacco use among adolescents in north Kerala, India. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 13, 5371-4. https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2012.13.11.5371
  22. Nunes T, Etchevers MJ, Merino O, et al (2013). High smoking cessation rate in Crohn's disease patients after physician advice-The TABACROHN Study. J Crohns Colitis, 7, 202-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crohns.2012.04.011
  23. Odukoya OO, Odeyemi KA, Oyeyemi AS, et al (2013). Determinants of smoking initiation and susceptibility to future smoking among school-going adolescents in Lagos State, Nigeria. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 14, 1747. https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2013.14.3.1747
  24. Ozturk C, Bektas M, Yilmaz E, et al (2011). Smoking status of Turkish nursing students and factors affecting their behavior. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 12, 1687-92.
  25. Philip PM, Parambil NA, Bhaskarapillai B, et al (2013). Evaluation of a specially designed tobacco control program to reduce tobacco use among school children in Kerala. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 14, 3455-9. https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2013.14.6.3455
  26. Pipe A, Sorensen M, Reid R (2009). Physician smoking status, attitudes toward smoking, and cessation advice to patients: an international survey. Patient Educ Couns, 74, 118-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2008.07.042
  27. Rhemtulla M, Brosseau-Liard PE, Savalei V (2012). When can categorical variables be treated as continuous? A comparison of robust continuous and categorical SEM estimation methods under suboptimal conditions. Psychol Methods, 17, 354. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029315
  28. Russell MAH, Peto J, Patel UA (1974). The classification of smoking by factorial structure of motives. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General), 313-46.
  29. Souza, ESTD, Crippa JADS, Pasian SR, et al (2009). Modified Reasons for Smoking Scale: translation to Portuguese, cross-cultural adaptation for use in Brazil and evaluation of test-retest reliability. J Bras Pneumol, 35, 683-9.
  30. Spielberger CD, Jacobs GA (1982). Personality and smoking behavior. J Pers Assess, 46, 396-403. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4604_11
  31. Sreeramareddy CT, Suri S, Menezes RG, et al (2010). Selfreported tobacco smoking practices among medical students and their perceptions towards training about tobacco smoking in medical curricula: A cross-sectional, questionnaire survey in Malaysia, India, Pakistan, Nepal, and Bangladesh. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy, 5, 29. https://doi.org/10.1186/1747-597X-5-29
  32. Warren CW, Jones NR, Chauvin J (2008). Tobacco use and cessation counselling: cross-country. Data from the Global Health Professions Student Survey (GHPSS), 2005-2007. Tobacco Control, 17, 238-47. https://doi.org/10.1136/tc.2007.023895
  33. West RJ, Russell AH (1985). Pre-abstinence smoke intake and smoking motivation as predictors of severity of cigarette withdrawal symptoms. Psychopharmacol, 87, 334-6. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00432717

Cited by

  1. The association of environmental, individual factors, and dopamine pathway gene variation with smoking cessation vol.22, pp.8, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1080/13548506.2017.1300670
  2. Psychometric Testing of Two Chinese-Version Scales on Attitudes Toward and Caregiving Behaviors for End-of-Life Patients and Families pp.1552-3799, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1177/1054773817699931
  3. Current Smoking Behavior Among Medical Students in Mainland China: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis pp.1941-2479, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1177/1010539518800339