DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Clinical Value of Real Time Elastography in Patients with Unexplained Cervical Lymphadenopathy: Quantitative Evaluation

  • Fu, Ying (Department of Ultrasound, Key laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute) ;
  • Shi, Yun-Fei (Department of Pathology, Key laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute) ;
  • Yan, Kun (Department of Ultrasound, Key laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute) ;
  • Wang, Yan-Jie (Department of Ultrasound, Key laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute) ;
  • Yang, Wei (Department of Ultrasound, Key laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute) ;
  • Feng, Guo-Shuang (National Center for Public Health Surveillance and Information Services, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention)
  • Published : 2014.07.15

Abstract

Ultrasonography is non-invasive and can give useful clues in the diagnosis of cervical lymphadenopathy, However, differential diagnosis is difficult in some situations even combined with color Doppler imaging. The present study was conducted to evaluate the clinical value of real time elastography in patients with unexplained cervical lymphadenopathy using a quantitative method. From May 2011 to February 2012, 39 enlarged lymph nodes from 39 patients with unexplained cervical lymphadenopathy were assessed. All the patients were examined by both B-mode ultrasound, color Doppler flow imaging and elastography. The method of analyzing elasto-graphic data was the calculation of the 10 parametres ("mean", "sd", "area%", "com", "kur", "ske", "con", "ent", "idm", "asm") offered by the software integrated into the Hitachi system. The findings were then correlated with the definitive tissue diagnosis obtained by lymph node dissection or biopsy. Final histology revealed 10 cases of metastatic lymph nodes, 11 cases of lymphoma, 12 cases of tuberculosis and 6 cases of nonspecific lymphadenitis. The significant distinguishing features for conventional ultrasound were the maximum short diameter (p=0.007) and absent of echogenic hilum (p=0.0293). The diagnostic accuracy was 43.6% (17/39 cases) and there were 17 patients with equivocal diagnosis. For elastography, "mean" (p=0.003), "area%" (p=0.009), "kurt" (p=0.0291), "skew" (p=0.014) and "cont" (p=0.012) demonstrated significant differences between groups. With 9 of the 17 patients with previous equivocal diagnoses (52.9%) definite and correct diagnoses could be obtained. The diagnostic accuracy for conventional ultrasound combined elastography was 69.2% (27/39 cases). There were differences in the diagnostic sensitivity of the two methods (p=0.0224). Ultrasound combined with elastography demonstrated higher rates of conclusive and accurate diagnoses in patients with unexplained cervical lymphadenopathy than conventional ultrasound. The quantitative program showed good correlation with the pathology of different lymph node diseases.

Keywords

References

  1. Ahuja A, Ying M (2002). An overview of neck node sonography. Invest Radiol, 37, 333-42. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004424-200206000-00005
  2. Ahuja A, Ying M (2003). Sonography of neck lymph nodes. Part II: abnormal lymph nodes. Clin Radiol, 58, 359-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-9260(02)00585-8
  3. Alam F, Naito K, Horiguchi J, et al (2008). Accuracy of sonographic elastography in the differential diagnosis of enlarged cervical lymph nodes: comparison with conventional B-mode sonography. Am J Roentgenol, 191, 604-10. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.07.3401
  4. Bhatia KS, Cho CC, Yuen YH, et al (2010). Real-time qualitative ultrasound elastography of cervical lymph nodes in routine clinical practice: interobserver agreement and correlation with malignancy. Ultrasound Med Biol, 36, 1990-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2010.08.016
  5. Dewall RJ (2013). Ultrasound elastography: principles, techniques, and clinical applications. Crit Rev Biomed Eng, 41, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1615/CritRevBiomedEng.2013006991
  6. Drakonaki EE, Allen GM, Wilson DJ (2012). Ultrasound elastography for musculoskeletal applications. Br J Radiol, 85, 1435-45. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr/93042867
  7. Habermann TM, Steensma DP (2000). Lymphadenopathy. Mayo Clin Proc, 75, 723-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0025-6196(11)64620-X
  8. Ishibashi N, Yamagata K, Sasaki H, et al (2012). Real-time tissue elastography for the diagnosis of lymph node metastasis in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Ultrasound Med Biol, 38, 389-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2011.12.004
  9. Kruger U, Kretschmer L, Thoms KM, et al (2011). Lymph node ultrasound during melanoma follow-up significantly improves metastasis detection compared with clinical examination alone: a study on 433 patients. Melanoma Res, 21, 457-63. https://doi.org/10.1097/CMR.0b013e328348dad3
  10. Khanna R, Sharma AD, Khanna S, Kumar M, Shukla RC (2011). Usefulness of ultrasonography for the evaluation of cervical lymphadenopathy. World J Surg Oncol, 28, 29.
  11. Parajuly SS, Lan PY, Yun MB, Gang YZ, Hua Z (2012). Diagnostic potential of strain ratio measurement and a 5 point scoring method for detection of breast cancer: Chinese experience. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 13, 1447-52. https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2012.13.4.1447
  12. Sandulescu L, Rogoveanu I, Ghenoea IA, Cazacu S, Saftoiu A (2013). Real-time elastography applications in liver pathology between expectations and results. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis, 22, 221-7.
  13. Screaton NJ, Berman LH, Grant JW (2002). Head and neck lymphadenopathy: evaluation with US-guided cutting-needle biopsy. Radiology, 224, 75-81. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2241010602
  14. Shaha AR (2008). Complications of neck dissection for thyroid cancer. Ann Surg Oncol, 15, 397-9. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-007-9724-x
  15. Tan R, Xiao Y, He Q (2010). Ultrasound elastography: Its potential role in assessment of cervical lymphadenopathy. Acad Radiol, 17, 849-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2010.03.014
  16. Teng DK, Wang H, Lin YQ, et al (2012). Value of ultrasound elastography in assessment of enlarged cervical lymph nodes. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 13, 2081-5. https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2012.13.5.2081
  17. Vassallo P, Wernecke K, Roos N, Peters PE (1992). Differentiation of benign from malignant superficial lymphadenopathy: the role of high-resolution US. Radiology, 183, 215-20. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.183.1.1549675
  18. Zhao YW, Jin ZJ, Zheng Y, et al (2008). Characteristics and classification of cervical tuberculous lymphadentis on ultrasonography. Shanghai Medical Imaging, 17, 218-9. (in Chinese)
  19. Ying L, Hou Y, Zheng HM, et al (2012). Real-time elastography for the differentiation of benign and malignant superficial lymph nodes: a meta-analysis. Eur J Radiol, 8, 2576-84.

Cited by

  1. Quantitative Analysis of Enlarged Cervical Lymph Nodes with Ultrasound Elastography vol.16, pp.16, 2015, https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2015.16.16.7291
  2. Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse Imaging for the Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Lymph Nodes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis vol.11, pp.11, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166716
  3. Clinical value of the VTIQ technology in the differential diagnosis of superficially enlarged lymph nodes pp.1600-0455, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1177/0284185117732601
  4. Retrospective analysis of the utility of multiparametric MRI for differentiating between benign and malignant breast lesions in women in China vol.97, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000009666