The Korean Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology

The Korean Society of Pharmacology (대한약리학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Inhibitory Effects of Ginsenoside-Rb2 on Nicotinic Stimulation-Evoked Catecholamine Secretion

  • Lim, Hyo-Jeong (Department of Internal Medicine (Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine), Veterans Health Service Medical Center) ;
  • Lee, Hyun-Young (Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, School of Medicine, Chosun University) ;
  • Lim, Dong-Yoon (Department of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, Chosun University)
  • Received : 2014.08.12
  • Accepted : 2014.09.16
  • Published : 2014.10.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to investigate whether ginsenoside-Rb2 (Rb2) can affect the secretion of catecholamines (CA) in the perfused model of the rat adrenal medulla. Rb2 ($3{\sim}30{\mu}M$), perfused into an adrenal vein for 90 min, inhibited ACh (5.32 mM)-evoked CA secretory response in a dose- and time-dependent fashion. Rb2 ($10{\mu}M$) also time-dependently inhibited the CA secretion evoked by DMPP ($100{\mu}M$, a selective neuronal nicotinic receptor agonist) and high $K^+$ (56 mM, a direct membrane depolarizer). Rb2 itself did not affect basal CA secretion (data not shown). Also, in the presence of Rb2 ($50{\mu}g/mL$), the secretory responses of CA evoked by veratridine (a selective $Na^+$ channel activator ($50{\mu}M$), Bay-K-8644 (an L-type dihydropyridine $Ca^{2+}$ channel activator, $10{\mu}M$), and cyclopiazonic acid (a cytoplasmic $Ca^{2+}$-ATPase inhibitor, $10{\mu}M$) were significantly reduced, respectively. Interestingly, in the simultaneous presence of Rb2 ($10{\mu}M$) and L-NAME (an inhibitor of NO synthase, $30{\mu}M$), the inhibitory responses of Rb2 on ACh-evoked CA secretory response was considerably recovered to the extent of the corresponding control secretion compared with the inhibitory effect of Rb2-treatment alone. Practically, the level of NO released from adrenal medulla after the treatment of Rb2 ($10{\mu}M$) was greatly elevated compared to the corresponding basal released level. Collectively, these results demonstrate that Rb2 inhibits the CA secretory responses evoked by nicotinic stimulation as well as by direct membrane-depolarization from the isolated perfused rat adrenal medulla. It seems that this inhibitory effect of Rb2 is mediated by inhibiting both the influx of $Ca^{2+}$ and $Na^+$ into the adrenomedullary chromaffin cells and also by suppressing the release of $Ca^{2+}$ from the cytoplasmic calcium store, at least partly through the increased NO production due to the activation of nitric oxide synthase, which is relevant to neuronal nicotinic receptor blockade.

Keywords

References

  1. Lim DY, Park KB, Kim KY, Lee KS, Moon JK, Kim YH. Influence to total ginseng saponin on secretion of catecholamines in the isolated adrenal gland of rabbits. Korean Biochem J. 1987;20:230-238.
  2. Lim DY, Park KB, Kim KH, Choi CH, Bae JW, Kim MW. Studies on secretion of catecholamines evoked by panaxadiol in the isolated rabbit adrenal gland. Korean J Pharmacol. 1988;24:31-42.
  3. Lim DY, Choi CH, Kim CD, Kim KH, Kim SB, Lee BJ, Chung MH. Influnce of Panaxatriol-type saponin on secretion of catecholamine from isolated perfused rabbit adrenal gland. Arch Pharm Res. 1989;12:166-175. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02855549
  4. Hong SP, Chi H, Cho SH, Lee YK, Woo SC, Kim IS, Oh SH, Yang WH, Lim DY. Influence of total Ginseng saponin on nicotinic stimulation-induced catecholamine secretion from the perfused rat adrenal gland. Korean J Hypert. 1999;5:1-10.
  5. Kudo K, Akasaka Y, Miyate Y, Takahashi E, Tachikawa E, Kashimoto T. Effects of red ginseng fractions on catecholamine secretion from bovine adrenal medullary cells. J Med Pharm Soc WAKAN-YAKU. 1992;9:236-239.
  6. Tachikawa E, Kudo K, Kashimoto T, Takahashi E. Ginseng saponins reduce acetylcholine-evoked Na+ influx and catecholamine secretion in bovine adrenal chromaffin cells. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1995;273:629-636.
  7. Kudo K, Tachikawa E, Kashimoto T, Takahashi E. Properties of ginseng saponin inhibition of catecholamine secretion in bovine adrenal chromaffin cells. Eur J Pharmacol. 1998;341: 139-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-2999(97)01350-2
  8. Tachikawa E, Kudo K, Nunokawa M, Kashimoto T, Takahashi E, Kitagawa S. Characterization of ginseng saponin ginsenoside- Rg(3) inhibition of catecholamine secretion in bovine adrenal chromaffin cells. Biochem Pharmacol. 2001;62:943-951. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-2952(01)00743-2
  9. Jeon BH, Kim CS, Kim HS, Park JB, Nam KY, Chang SJ. Effect of Korean red ginseng on blood pressure and nitric oxide production. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2000;21:1095-1100.
  10. Kim ND, Kim EM, Kang KW, Cho MK, Choi SY, Kim SG. Ginsenoside Rg3 inhibits phenylephrine-induced vascular contraction through induction of nitric oxide synthase. Br J Pharmacol. 2003;140:661-670. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjp.0705490
  11. Han K, Shin IC, Choi KJ, Yun YP, Hong JT, Oh KW. Korea red ginseng water extract increases nitric oxide concentrations in exhaled breath. Nitric Oxide. 2005;12:159-162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.niox.2005.02.001
  12. Kim ND, Kang SY, Schini VB. Ginsenosides evoke endothelium- dependent vascular relaxation in rat aorta. Gen Pharmacol. 1994;25:1071-1077. https://doi.org/10.1016/0306-3623(94)90121-X
  13. Kim ND, Kang SY, Park JH, Schini-Kerth VB. Ginsenoside Rg3 mediates endothelium-dependent relaxation in response to ginsenosides in rat aorta: role of $K^+$ channels. Eur J Pharmacol. 1999;367:41-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-2999(98)00898-X
  14. Kang SY, Schini-Kerth VB, Kim ND. Ginsenosides of the protopanaxatriol group cause endothelium-dependent relaxation in the rat aorta. Life Sci. 1995;56:1577-1586. https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3205(95)00124-O
  15. Hien TT, Kim ND, Pokharel YR, Oh SJ, Lee MY, Kang KW. Ginsenoside Rg3 increases nitric oxide production via increases in phosphorylation and expression of endothelial nitric oxide synthase: essential roles of estrogen receptor-dependent PI3- kinase and AMP-activated protein kinase. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2010;246:171-183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.taap.2010.05.008
  16. Leung KW, Cheng YK, Mak NK, Chan KK, Fan TP, Wong RN. Signaling pathway of ginsenoside-Rg1 leading to nitric oxide production in endothelial cells. FEBS Lett. 2006;580:3211-3216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet.2006.04.080
  17. Han SW, Kim H. Ginsenosides stimulate endogenous production of nitric oxide in rat kidney. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 1996; 28:573-580. https://doi.org/10.1016/1357-2725(95)00163-8
  18. Chai H, Zhou W, Lin P, Lumsden A, Yao Q, Chen C. Ginsenosides block HIV protease inhibitor ritonavir-induced vascular dysfunction of porcine coronary arteries. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2005;288:H2965-2971. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.01271.2004
  19. Wakade AR. Studies on secretion of catecholamines evoked by acetylcholine or transmural stimulation of the rat adrenal gland. J Physiol. 1981;313:463-480. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1981.sp013676
  20. Anton AH, Sayre DF. A study of the factors affecting the aluminum oxide-trihydroxyindole procedure for the analysis of catecholamines. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1962;138:360-375.
  21. McVeigh GE, Hamilton P, Wilson M, Hanratty CG, Leahey WJ, Devine AB, Morgan DG, Dixon LJ, McGrath LT. Platelet nitric oxide and superoxide release during the development of nitrate tolerance: effect of supplemental ascorbate. Circulation. 2002; 106:208-213. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000021600.84149.78
  22. Tallarida RJ, Murray RB. Manual of pharmacologic calculation with computer programs. 2nd ed. New York: Speringer-Verlag; 1987. 132 p.
  23. Garcia AG, Sala F, Reig JA, Viniegra S, Frias J, Fonteriz R, Gandia L. Dihydropyridine BAY-K-8644 activates chromaffin cell calcium channels. Nature. 1984;309:69-71. https://doi.org/10.1038/309069a0
  24. Lim DY, Kim CD, Ahn GW. Influence of TMB-8 on secretion of catecholamines from the perfused rat adrenal glands. Arch Pharm Res. 1992;15:115-125. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02974085
  25. Goeger DE, Riley RT. Interaction of cyclopiazonic acid with rat skeletal muscle sarcoplasmic reticulum vesicles. Effect on $Ca^{2+}$ binding and $Ca^{2+}$ permeability. Biochem Pharmacol. 1989;38: 3995-4003. https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-2952(89)90679-5
  26. Seidler NW, Jona I, Vegh M, Martonosi A. Cyclopiazonic acid is a specific inhibitor of the $Ca^{2+}$-ATPase of sarcoplasmic reticulum. J Biol Chem. 1989;264:17816-17823.
  27. Wada Y, Satoh K, Taira N. Cardiovascular profile of Bay K 8644, a presumed calcium channel activator, in the dog. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 1985;328:382-387. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00692905
  28. Torres M, Ceballos G, Rubio R. Possible role of nitric oxide in catecholamine secretion by chromaffin cells in the presence and absence of cultured endothelial cells. J Neurochem. 1994;63: 988-996.
  29. Uchiyama Y, Morita K, Kitayama S, Suemitsu T, Minami N, Miyasako T, Dohi T. Possible involvement of nitric oxide in acetylcholine-induced increase of intracellular $Ca^{2+}$ concentration and catecholamine release in bovine adrenal chromaffin cells. Jpn J Pharmacol. 1994;65:73-77. https://doi.org/10.1254/jjp.65.73
  30. O'Sullivan AJ, Burgoyne RD. Cyclic GMP regulates nicotineinduced secretion from cultured bovine adrenal chromaffin cells: effects of 8-bromo-cyclic GMP, atrial natriuretic peptide, and nitroprusside (nitric oxide). J Neurochem. 1990;54:1805-1808. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-4159.1990.tb01238.x
  31. Breslow MJ, Tobin JR, Bredt DS, Ferris CD, Snyder SH, Traystman RJ. Role of nitric oxide in adrenal medullary vasodilation during catecholamine secretion. Eur J Pharmacol. 1992;210:105-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-2999(92)90659-R
  32. Breslow MJ, Tobin JR, Bredt DS, Ferris CD, Snyder SH, Traystman RJ. Nitric oxide as a regulator of adrenal blood flow. Am J Physiol. 1993;264:H464-469.
  33. Viveros OH. Mechanism of secretion of catecholaminies from adrenal medulla. In: Blaschko H, Sayers G, Smith DA, eds. Handbook of physiology, Endocrinology. Vol VI, Sect 7, The adrenal gland. Washington DC: American physiological society; 1975. 389-426 p.
  34. Han KH, Choe SC, Kim HS, Sohn DW, Nam KY, Oh BH, Lee MM, Park YB, Choi YS, Seo JD, Lee YW. Effect of red ginseng on blood pressure in patients with essential hypertension and white coat hypertension. Am J Chin Med. 1998;26:199-209. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0192415X98000257
  35. Jeon BH, Kim CS, Park KS, Lee JW, Park JB, Kim KJ, Kim SH, Chang SJ, Nam KY. Effect of Korea red ginseng on the blood pressure in conscious hypertensive rats. Gen Pharmacol. 2000;35:135-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-3623(01)00096-9
  36. Sung J, Han KH, Zo JH, Park HJ, Kim CH, Oh BH. Effects of red ginseng upon vascular endothelial function in patients with essential hypertension. Am J Chin Med. 2000;28:205-216. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0192415X00000258
  37. Dixon WR, Garcia AG, Kirpekar SM. Release of catecholamines and dopamine beta-hydroxylase from the perfused adrenal gland of the cat. J Physiol. 1975;244:805-824. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1975.sp010827
  38. Viveros OH, Arqueros L, Kirshner N. Release of catecholamines and dopamine beta-hydroxylase from the adrenal medulla. Life Sci. 1968;7:609-618. https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3205(68)90186-0
  39. Douglas WW. Stimulus-secretion coupling: the concept and clues from chromaffin and other cells. Br J Pharmacol. 1968; 34:451-474. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-5381.1968.tb08474.x
  40. Sorimachi M, Yoshida K. Exocytotic release of catecholamines and dopamine-beta-hydroxylase from the perfused adrenal gland of the rabbit and cat. Br J Pharmacol. 1979;65:117-125. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-5381.1979.tb17340.x
  41. Nakazato Y, Ohga A, Oleshansky M, Tomita U, Yamada Y. Voltage-independent catecholamine release mediated by the activation of muscarinic receptors in guinea-pig adrenal glands. Br J Pharmacol. 1988;93:101-109. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-5381.1988.tb11410.x
  42. Lim DY, Hwang DH. Studies on secretion of catecholamines evoked by DMPP and McN-A-343 in the rat adrenal gland. Korean J Pharmacol. 1991;27:53-67.
  43. Rang HP, Colquhoun D, Rang HP. The action of ganglionic blocking drugs on the synaptic responses of rat submandibular ganglion cells. Br J Pharmacol. 1982;75:151-168. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-5381.1982.tb08768.x
  44. Weaver WR, Wolf KM, Chiappinelli VA. Functional heterogeneity of nicotinic receptors in the avian lateral spiriform nucleus detected with trimethaphan. Mol Pharmacol. 1994;46: 993-1001.
  45. Wada A, Yanagihara N, Izumi F, Sakurai S, Kobayashi H. Trifluoperazine inhibits 45$Ca^{2+}$ uptake and catecholamine secretion and synthesis in adrenal medullary cells. J Neurochem. 1983;40:481-486. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-4159.1983.tb11308.x
  46. Schramm M, Thomas G, Towart R, Franckowiak G. Novel dihydropyridines with positive inotropic action through activation of $Ca^{2+}$ channels. Nature. 1983;303:535-537. https://doi.org/10.1038/303535a0
  47. Fisher SK, Holz RW, Agranoff BW. Muscarinic receptors in chromaffin cell cultures mediate enhanced phospholipid labeling but not catecholamine secretion. J Neurochem. 1981; 37:491-497. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-4159.1981.tb00482.x
  48. Yanagihara N, Isosaki M, Ohuchi T, Oka M. Muscarinic receptor-mediated increase in cyclic GMP level in isolated bovine adrenal medullary cells. FEBS Lett. 1979;105:296-298. https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-5793(79)80633-X
  49. Wakade AR, Wakade TD. Contribution of nicotinic and muscarinic receptors in the secretion of catecholamines evoked by endogenous and exogenous acetylcholine. Neuroscience. 1983;10:973-978. https://doi.org/10.1016/0306-4522(83)90235-X
  50. Kilpatrick DL, Slepetis R, Kirshner N. Ion channels and membrane potential in stimulus-secretion coupling in adrenal medulla cells. J Neurochem. 1981;36:1245-1255. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-4159.1981.tb01724.x
  51. Kilpatrick DL, Slepetis RJ, Corcoran JJ, Kirshner N. Calcium uptake and catecholamine secretion by cultured bovine adrenal medulla cells. J Neurochem. 1982;38:427-435. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-4159.1982.tb08647.x
  52. Knight DE, Kesteven NT. Evoked transient intracellular free $Ca^{2+}$ changes and secretion in isolated bovine adrenal medullary cells. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1983;218:177-199. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1983.0033
  53. Wada A, Takara H, Izumi F, Kobayashi H, Yanagihara N. Influx of 22Na through acetylcholine receptor-associated Na channels: relationship between 22Na influx, 45Ca influx and secretion of catecholamines in cultured bovine adrenal medulla cells. Neuroscience. 1985;15:283-292. https://doi.org/10.1016/0306-4522(85)90135-6
  54. Kidokoro Y, Ritchie AK. Chromaffin cell action potentials and their possible role in adrenaline secretion from rat adrenal medulla. J Physiol. 1980;307:199-216. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1980.sp013431
  55. Burgoyne RD. Mechanisms of secretion from adrenal chromaffin cells. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1984;779:201-216. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4157(84)90009-1
  56. Oka M, Isosaki M, Yanagihara N. Isolated bovine adrenal medullary cells: studies on regulation of catecholamine synthesis and release. In: Usdin E, Kopin IJ, Brachas J, ed. Catecholamines: basic and clinical frontiers. Oxford: Pergamon Press; 1979. 70-72 p.
  57. Suzuki M, Muraki K, Imaizumi Y, Watanabe M. Cyclopiazonic acid, an inhibitor of the sarcoplasmic reticulum $Ca^{2+}$-pump, reduces $Ca^{2+}$-dependent $K^+$ currents in guinea-pig smooth muscle cells. Br J Pharmacol. 1992;107:134-140. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-5381.1992.tb14475.x
  58. Uyama Y, Imaizumi Y, Watanabe M. Effects of cyclopiazonic acid, a novel $Ca^{2+}$-ATPase inhibitor, on contractile responses in skinned ileal smooth muscle. Br J Pharmacol. 1992;106: 208-214. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-5381.1992.tb14316.x

Cited by

  1. Ultrasonication processed Panax ginseng berry extract induces apoptosis through an intrinsic apoptosis pathway in HepG2 cells vol.39, pp.6, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12272-016-0760-6
  2. Ginsenoside Rb2 alleviates myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury in rats through SIRT1 activation vol.85, pp.11, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1111/1750-3841.15505